CONCEPT PAPER FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE JUNE 2015 Foundations for Young Adult Success A Developmental Framework INT WL E D KNOSK I L LSGE & AGE NC Y EDUCATION SE CO LF -REGULA MPE TE TIO N E I C N VA L U E S HEALTH Young Adult Success DENT I TY DI WORK R E AT S M I ND ETS EG FAMILY FRIENDS CIVIC ENGAGEMENT S Jenny Nagaoka, Camille A. Farrington, Stacy B. Ehrlich, and Ryan D. Heath with David W. Johnson, Sarah Dickson, Ashley Cureton Turner, Ashley Mayo, and Kathleen Hayes TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary Introduction 11 Defining Success in Young Adulthood Chapter 1 Chapter 3 57 Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood Chapter 4 19 What are the Ingredients of “Success”? 77 Conclusion and Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research Chapter 2 85 References 37 The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 99 Appendix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support and expertise of numerous people. We would like to thank all of the experts who graciously shared their time and knowledge with us to help shape this work. In particular, we are grateful for the feedback we received on this report from Abigail Baird, Ron Berger, Jiffy Lansing, and Jane Quinn. We would also like to thank our Steering Committee readers, Kim Zalent and Erin Unander for their insightful comments and feedback. Liz Duffrin conducted interviews with youth, parents, and program providers, resulting in the profiles presented in this report. Many colleagues supported us throughout this work. Thank you to David Stevens helping us create engaging and meaningful conversations at our convenings; to Elaine Allensworth, Emily Krone, Jessica Puller, Melissa Roderick, and Sue Sporte for numerous readings and feedback as we progressed through our conceptualizations; and to Bronwyn McDaniel, who helped manage all aspects of communication and outreach related to this project. This project has been generously funded by the Wallace Foundation. We are extremely grateful for the ongoing support, flexibility, and positive guidance of Hilary Rhodes, Senior Research and Evaluation Officer at The Wallace Foundation. Finally, we also acknowledge the Spencer Foundation and the Lewis-Sebring Family Foundation, whose operating grants support the work of UChicago CCSR. This report was produced by UChicago CCSR’s publications and communications staff: Emily Krone, Director for Outreach and Communication; Bronwyn McDaniel, Senior Manager for Outreach and Communication; and Jessica Puller, Communications Specialist. 06.2015/2500/jh.design@rcn.com Graphic Design: Jeff Hall Design Infographics: Tremendousness Photography: Cynthia Howe Editing: Ann Lindner INTEGRATE ENVISION CONNECT ©2015 University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research Continued on reverse. ENCOUNTER REFLECTION ACTION EVALUATE DESCRIBE Being successful means having the Agency to make active choices about one’s life path, possessing the Competencies to adapt to the demands of different contexts, and incorporating different aspects of oneself into an Integrated Identity. Key Factors Values are enduring, often culturally-defined, beliefs about what is good or bad and what is important in life. Values serve as broad guidelines for living and provide an orientation for one’s desired future. Mindsets are beliefs and attitudes about oneself, the world, and the interaction between the two. They are the lenses we use to process everyday experience. Knowledge is sets of facts, information, or understanding about self, others, and the world. Skills are the learned ability to carry out a task with intended results or goals, and can be either general or domain-specific. Self-Regulation includes awareness of oneself and one’s surroundings, and managing one’s attention, emotions, and behaviors in goal-directed ways. Foundational Components Over time, through developmental experiences, children build four foundational components, which underlie three “key factors” to success. Developmental Experiences Build Components and Key Factors of Success HOME SCHOOL CO SE DSETS Funded by S N EG IE TENC -R E G U LATIO MPE LF REFLECTION ACTION MIN INT R ORGANIZED ACTIVITIES IDEN TINKER CHOOSE PRACTICE CONTRIBUTE Children learn through developmental experiences that combine Action and Reflection, ideally within the context of trusting relationships with adults. Developmental Experiences Require Action and Reflection Children are shaped by their interactions with the world, the adults around them, and how they make meaning of their experiences no matter where they are. Developmental Experiences Can Happen in All Settings AG E Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Y This framework synthesizes decades of research evidence, practice wisdom, and theory to capture a holistic view of children’s developmental needs from early childhood to young adulthood. Whether at home or school, in an afterschool program, or out in their community, young people are always developing. Broader societal contexts, systems, and institutions shape youth development—often creating big disparities in opportunities and outcomes. Adults also play a pivotal role, and can give young people a better chance at successful lives by understanding and intentionally nurturing their development. Download the full report at ccsr.uchicago.edu and wallacefoundation.org VA L U E S NC WLEDGE KNOSK I L LS & AT ED TITY Early Childhood CR IES N ET TR TENC IES N CONCEPT VA L U E S ©2015 University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research MPE O RE G ULATI IV S C O UP O RE G ULATI ETENCIES L F- MP SE N OTHERS SELF WORLD MINDSETS GRO -B A (Middle Grades, Ages 11-14) IE ON ID Early Adolescence TENC RE G ULATI MPE L F- CO SE OTHERS SELF WORLD MINDSETS I ND Middle Adolescence (High School, Ages 15-18) EDUCATION HEALTH WORK KEY YO LF PETENCI - R E G U L ATI O R S CE S Funded by ES N EG G ADU T SUC L OM UN C SE DSETS MIN INT FAMILY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT FRIENDS Emergence of Key Factors KEY FACTORS Young Adulthood Ongoing Development FOUNDATIONAL COMPONENTS (Postsecondary, Ages 19-22) Developmental Focus During this Stage FOUNDATIONAL COMPONENTS Providing the right experiences for growth requires knowledge of child and youth development. The development of the four foundational components, along with agency, integrated identity, and competencies, occurs at different stages throughout childhood and adolescence. Development into a successful young adult entails growth of the self and one’s abilities to interact with others and navigate the broader world. We define success beyond education and employment to include healthy relationships, a meaningful place within a community, and contributing to a larger good. Download the full report at ccsr.uchicago.edu and wallacefoundation.org VA L U E S CO L F- LF- SE AC T SE IDE OTHERS SELF WORLD M I NDSETS ABS (Elementary School, Ages 6-10) Middle Childhood TENC O RE G ULATI MPE L F- CO SE OTHERS SELF WORLD DSETS MIN CON (Preschool, Ages 3-5) AG EN CY OWLEDG KN S K I L L S E & AG EN CY OWLEDG KN S K I L L S E & CY AG EN OWLED KN SKILLSGE & Y EN C Y Focus of Development Changes as Children Grow Older CONCEPT AG S ED OWLED KN SKILLSGE & VA L U E S AG LF- EN C E SE DENT I TY DI VA L U E S OW L E D G KN S K I L L S E & U E AT AT IDENT I TY D E NTITY VA L U E S Executive Summary Every society in every age needs to grapple with the question of what outcomes it hopes to produce in raising its young. What exactly do we hope our children will be able to accomplish as adults? What vision guides our work? How do we make that vision a reality for all children? How do we better harness what is known in the research, practice, and policy arenas to ensure that all youth have what they need to successfully meet the complex challenges of young adulthood? Preparing all youth for meaningful, productive futures requires coordinated efforts and intentional practices by adults across all the settings youth inhabit on a daily basis. To address these questions, this report aims to build a identity, and competencies) and four foundational common understanding of young people’s developmen- components (self-regulation, knowledge and skills, tal needs from early childhood through young adult- mindsets, and values) that underlie them, (2) takes into hood and proposes a developmental framework of the account what we know about how children develop, Foundations for Young Adult Success. The framework is (3) considers how the backgrounds of and contexts in the result of synthesizing research, theory, and practice which young people live affect their development, and knowledge from a range of disciplines and approaches. (4) makes the intentional provision of opportunities for This work is influenced by ideas spanning the last young people to experience, interact, and make mean- century, from Dewey’s theory of learning from nearly ing of their experiences the central vehicle for learning a century ago to cutting-edge findings in neuroscience and development. on how the brain works. It integrates these perspecefforts of all adults who are responsible for raising, edu- What Do We Mean by “Success” in Young Adulthood? cating, or otherwise working with children and youth. Most policy efforts attempt to address socioeconomic In the past several years, a large number of frame- gaps in youth outcomes by focusing on educational at- tives into an accessible framework designed to guide the works and standards have been created to provide tainment as the central investment in preparing youth guidance on what young people need to learn. The for adulthood. However, while building an educated Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental workforce is one of the core goals of our investments in framework describes how to enact these frameworks young people, it is far from the only goal. Success also and standards across the settings in school, out of means that young people can fulfill individual goals school, and at home. It characterizes the experiences and have the agency and competencies to influence the and relationships youth need to develop into young world around them. This broader definition of success is adults who have agency, an integrated identity, and the based on the synthesis of literature from various fields, requisite competencies to successfully meet the com- as well as interviews with practice experts and youth plex challenges of young adulthood and become thriv- service providers (see box entitled Project Overview ing, contributing members of their communities. The and Methodology p.3), who articulated their larger role approach described in this report: (1) identifies three as helping young people develop an awareness of them- key factors of young adult success (agency, an integrated selves and of the wide range of options before them, Executive Summary 1 competencies to pursue those options, and the ability critical step in eliminating the silos that adults working to make good future choices for their lives as engaged with young people often operate within. To this end, the citizens in the world. This larger focus is inseparable report provides a framework of foundational components from goals related to college and career. and key factors for success in young adulthood. The report organizes the definition of young adult success 2 Context Plays a Crucial Role in Providing Equal Opportunities to All Youth around three key factors; these are agency, integrated The picture of young people as self-actualized masters young adult poised for success interacts with the world of destiny is complicated by persuasive research on (agency), the internal compass that a young adult uses the role of context in shaping youth outcomes, specifi- to make decisions consistent with her values, beliefs, cally, structural forces that govern socioeconomic life and goals (an integrated identity), and how she is able to in the United States (e.g., segregation, discrimination, be effective in different tasks (competencies). The three joblessness).1 From this perspective, a young person is key factors allow a young adult to manage and adapt to fundamentally the product of experiences and social changing demands and successfully navigate various set- interactions, within and across a range of contexts, from tings with different cultures and expectations. However, the immediate setting to larger institutions to cultural a person can have strong agency, identity, and competen- norms, all of which collectively shape the developing cies in one setting without being able to automatically individual. Larger contextual factors of society, the transfer those to a new setting; having an integrated economy, and institutions (such as schools) play a central identity means that a person has consistency and role in the inequitable opportunities afforded to young coherence across different roles in different settings. 2 identity, and competencies. These factors capture how a people, as well as in their ability to see opportunities as viable options and take advantage of them. The obstacles The Three Key Factors to following a successful path to adulthood and the Agency is the ability to make choices about and take an opportunities available to young adults vary greatly by active role in one’s life path, rather than solely being the the contexts they inhabit. Thus, there is a fundamental product of one’s circumstances. Agency requires the in- tension between preparing children to live in the world tentionality and forethought to derive a course of action that is often cast as a tacit acceptance of a profoundly and adjust course as needed to reflect one’s identity, com- unjust status quo and equipping them to face, navigate, petencies, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values. and challenge the inequitable distributions of resources and access that so often limit their opportunities and constrain their potential. It is within these tensions that we explore broad multidisciplinary evidence from research and practice about the underlying constructs that support a successful transition into young adulthood. Ingredients of “Success” that Comprise the Developmental Framework for Young Adult Success Integrated Identity is a sense of internal consistency of who one is across time and across multiple social identities (e.g., race/ethnicity, profession, culture, gender, religion). An integrated identity serves as an internal framework for making choices and provides a stable base from which one can act in the world. Competencies are the abilities that enable people to effectively perform roles, complete complex tasks, or achieve specific objectives. Successful young adults What are the ingredients necessary for young adults to have sets of competencies (e.g., critical thinking, succeed? Building a common set of objectives and having responsible decision-making, ability to collaborate) a clear understanding of how to foster development is a that allow them to be productive and engaged, navigate 1 Bowles & Gintis (1976, 2002); Duncan & Murnane (2011); 2 Neal & Neal (2013); Bronfenbrenner (1977, 1979, 1986). Lewis (2011); Massey & Denton (1993); Putnam (2015); Wilson (1990, 2012). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Project Overview and Methodology In November 2013, the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research (UChicago CCSR) was awarded a competitive grant from the Wallace Foundation to build a conceptual framework that articulates what is needed to guide children and youth to become successful young adults. The charge was to analyze and synthesize the best of research evidence, theory, expert opinion, and practice wisdom in the service of identifying the broad range of factors critical for young adult success. We consolidated current understanding of how these factors can be fostered in schools, communities, and homes from early childhood to young adulthood. In addition to a thorough grounding in published research, the project included interviewing and holding convenings and meetings with experts in research, policy, and practice across a range of fields and disciplines. To further ground the synthesis in real-world problems, we also interviewed a diverse selection of nine youth and the adults who work with them in schools, community programs, and agencies in Chicago and developed youth profiles. We sought to find the points of agreement across disparate perspectives, raise the points of contention, and leverage the collective wisdom to best understand the full scope of factors essential to young adult success and how to develop them. The Three Phases of the Project To achieve a cohesive and comprehensive framework, the project team undertook three phases of information-gathering. Each successive phase built upon the work of the previous phase, and each phase was defined by a different goal and set of questions: • Phase l: We focused on defining “success” and identifying the factors that are critical for success in young adulthood, particularly in college and at the beginning of a career. • Phase II: Building on the critical factors identified in Phase l, we sought to understand how each factor developed over the course of early life, from the preschool years through young adulthood. We focused on the identification of leverage points for best supporting children’s holistic development, keeping in mind that child and youth development occurs in multiple settings. • Phase III: We aimed to consolidate current understanding of how critical factors of young adult success can be fostered in a holistic, coordinated way across schools, community organizations, and homes, from early childhood to young adulthood. We focused on a ground-level, practitioner perspective in considering how to best organize adult efforts to promote the development of children and youth. Each phase of work culminated in internal working documents to help us consolidate our progress and thinking. The white paper that resulted from Phase I, A Framework for Developing Young Adult Success in the 21st Century: Defining Young Adult Success, is available at http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Wallace%20Framework%20White%20Paper.pdf. The current report is a culmination of the three phases of work outlined above, with an emphasis on our learnings from Phases I and II. Findings from Phase III will be explored in future work. across contexts, perform effectively in different set- developed and expressed in multiple spheres—within tings, and adapt to different task and setting demands. the self, in relation to others, and in the broader world(s) one inhabits. 3 The role of each component is threefold. The Four Foundational Components First, when young people have experiences and make Underlying the capacity for the three key factors are meaning of those experiences, each component interacts four foundational components that span both cogni- to promote the development of the other foundational tive and noncognitive factors. These four foundational components and the three key factors. Second, they components are self-regulation, knowledge and skills, enable healthy and productive functioning at every stage mindsets, and values. The foundational components are of life. Finally, they directly contribute to young adult 3 The notion that positive youth development requires skills in of skills necessary for success in the 21st century (e.g., Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012; Weissberg & Cascarino, 2013). both the interpersonal (or social) and intrapersonal (or self) domains has been put forth by other models and frameworks Executive Summary 3 success. The foundational components were chosen Values are enduring, often culturally defined beliefs because they are malleable; that is, they can be changed about what is good or bad, and what is important in life. by experiences and the efforts of and interactions with Values include both the moral code of conduct one uses other people, in both positive and negative ways, and in daily activities (e.g., being kind, being truthful) and then be internalized. As young people engage in ongo- long-term “outcomes” of importance (e.g., getting an ing experiences that help them develop the foundational education, having a family, contributing to the com- components, these components can become internalized munity) that may not necessarily have a right or wrong as automatic responses (or habits) that become a core valence. Values develop through a process of explora- part of their identity; this automatic behavior allows tion and experimentation, where young people make them to then be transferred across contexts. While all sense of their experiences and refine what they believe of the foundational components develop throughout in. Values are a key developmental task during middle every stage of a young person’s life, the development of adolescence and young adulthood. specific components is more salient during some stages than others. Young people develop the foundational components and key factors through experiences and relationships, and these are always embedded within larger societal, economic, and institutional contexts 4 that influence how youth perceive the opportunities and obstacles posed by their environments. Developmental Experiences and Relationships Support Success Development is a natural, ongoing process that happens as young people observe the world, interact with others, and make meaning of their experiences. Regardless of the degree of adult guidance, children will still “develop” in some way, learning how to do things and Self-Regulation is the awareness of oneself and one’s coming to conclusions about themselves, their pros- surroundings, and the ability to manage one’s atten- pects, and their paths forward. They will develop some tion, emotions, and behaviors in goal-directed ways. skills and preferences, and they will likely figure out Self-regulation has numerous forms, including cogni- what they need to know to get by. And yet, the devel- tive, emotional, behavioral, and attentional regulation. opmental benefit of children’s experiences can be Self-regulation is a key developmental task during early enhanced and directed by others to help youth best and middle childhood. formulate and internalize the developmental “lessons” Knowledge is the sets of facts, information, or under- standing about oneself, others, and the world. Skills are the learned abilities to carry out a task with intended results or goals. Building academic knowledge and skills is a key developmental task during early and middle childhood, although it occurs through all stages of development. from these experiences. 4 However, the nature and number of children’s opportunities for development vary significantly by race and socioeconomic class. The foundational components and key factors of young adult success are mutually reinforcing, helping young people to both learn from and proactively shape their worlds. The core question for practice is how these foundational components and key factors can be inten- Mindsets are beliefs and attitudes about oneself, the tionally developed. How do children learn knowledge, external world, and the interaction between the two. skills, values, mindsets, and the complex processes of They are the default lenses that individuals use to self-regulation, as well as develop competencies es- process everyday experiences. Mindsets reflect a per- sential to success in the 21st century? The essential son’s unconscious biases, natural tendencies, and past social context for this process is what we term devel- experiences. Though mindsets are malleable, they tend opmental experiences . Developmental experiences to persist until disrupted and replaced with a different are most supportive of youth’s needs when they occur belief or attitude. within what the Search Institute calls developmental 4 Vygotsky (1978). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework relationships .5 Development is nurtured in the context The iterative and fundamentally relational processes of strong, supportive, and sustained developmental of experiencing, interacting, and reflecting represent a relationships with adults and peers. Developmental critical engine for children’s development and as such are experiences offer opportunities for young people to the core of the conceptual model linking experiences and engage in various forms of action and reflection. It is relationships with outcomes. through ongoing cycles of age-appropriate action and Strong, supported, and sustained relationships with reflection experiences that young people build the four caring adults provide an important space for youth to foundational components (self-regulation; knowledge experiment, try out roles and behaviors, and receive and skills; mindsets; and values), and develop agency, an feedback that helps to build an integrated identity. integrated identity, and competencies. However, in order to provide the best experiences for youth, it is imperative to understand where youth are Developmental Experiences developmentally throughout their young lives. This Developmental experiences are opportunities for action understanding allows for more appropriate interactions and reflection that help young people build self-regu- between adults and youth. A contextual understanding lation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values, and of children’s development offers guidance on how to develop agency, an integrated identity, and competen- design direct experiences in ways that provide the right cies. These experiences are “maximized” in the context kinds of support and challenges to growth at various of social interactions with others. Experience must be stages of early life. Each component develops at differ- assigned meaning and be integrated into one’s emerging ent rates over the life course. So when is the most cru- sense of identity if it is to have lasting or transferrable cial time to be focusing on supporting the maturation benefit. Mediating young people’s thinking about their of each of our four components? Do they all hold equal experience is one important way that adults aid in learn- weight at different stages of development? ing and development. contributions that are valued by others, they gain Developmental Progression toward Young Adulthood self-confidence and come to see themselves as capable Development is multifaceted (social, emotional, attitu- and able to effect change in their own lives and in the dinal, behavioral, cognitive, physical) and each aspect larger world. What matters most for development is not of development is inextricably connected to the others. the intentions of adults, but their actual enactment of This report takes a developmental perspective because, practices in relation to young people, how young people in order to design and deliver the most effective experi- experience those practices, and the meaning young ences for youth, it is imperative to understand where people make of those experiences. This has training youth are developmentally throughout their young and professional development implications for teachers, lives. This understanding makes it possible for adults to parents, childcare providers, and youth workers. match more appropriate experiences and interactions When young people have the opportunity to make to the developmental needs of young people. Developmental Relationships The practices of adults are more effective when Critical to the process of making meaning out of de- they are intentional, are focused on the foundational velopmental experiences are strong, supportive, and components and key factors that support the ability to sustained relationships with caring adults who can transition successfully into young adulthood, and are encourage young people to reflect on their experiences based on an understanding of where youth are develop- and help them to interpret those experiences in ways mentally. The development of the key factors of young that expand their sense of themselves and their horizons. adult success (competencies, identity, and agency) and 5 Search Institute (2014). Executive Summary 5 the four foundational components that underlie them adulthood is strongly shaped by the ways in which and (self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and degrees to which earlier developmental tasks were met. values) occurs at different rates from early childhood They draw upon the foundation laid in each preceding through young adulthood. Consistent and supportive stage or the interventions that have successfully com- interactions with caregivers provide the greatest oppor- pensated for prior developmental lapses. To meet the tunity for cognitive stimulation, and in ways that can development tasks as one embarks on young adulthood, a have long-lasting impacts on children’s development. young person should be able to draw upon strong relation- Whereas appropriate stimulation supports continuing ships with adults and peers; the foundational components development, a lack of stimulation can create barriers of self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and to later development, potentially requiring more inten- values; and the agency, an integrated identity, and compe- sive intervention later. tencies to take an active role in shaping their life course. Different factors develop at different rates over be focusing on supporting the maturation of each of Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research the four components or three key factors? Do they all The vision behind the Foundations for Young Adult hold equal weight at different stages of development? Success developmental framework is about building a Below, we highlight the most salient areas of growth society where all children grow up to reach their full during each stage of development, with an eye toward potential, regardless of which side of the economic (1) which foundational components or key factors are divide they were born. Currently, opportunities for most influenced by input, experiences, and interactions rich and varied developmental experiences through with others; and (2) which components or key factors K-12 schooling and informal education are largely need to be developed during the earlier stages to facili- determined by family resources; to address these tate positive development at later stages. However, it is inequities, it will not be enough to simply expand crucial that adults not exclude other areas of develop- options by adding more well-run programs, providing ment when engaging with children and youth; nearly a few more resources, or reforming a subset of schools. every aspect of the foundational components and key It will take a transformation of adult beliefs and prac- factors is forming, or is at least being influenced by the tices within the existing institutions and structures experiences youth encounter, at every stage of life. that shape children’s learning and development. It the course of life. So when is the most crucial time to 6 will mean building a collective sense of responsibility In brief, the key developmental tasks during early stages for expanding the possibilities for all young people, of development are: not just for our own children. It means integrating • Early childhood (ages 3 to 5): Self-regulation; interpersonal (social-emotional) knowledge and skills • Middle childhood (ages 6 to 10): Self-regulation (self-awareness and self-control); learning-related skills and knowledge; interpersonal skills • Early adolescence (ages 11 to 14): Group-based identity; emerging mindsets • Middle adolescence (ages 15 to 18): Sense of values; individuated identity • Young adulthood (ages 19 to 22): Integrated identity What happens as adolescents transition into young afterschool providers’ lens of youth development with educators’ knowledge of learning theory with families’ deep understanding of the unique needs and circumstances of their children. By drawing from the knowledge, approaches, and experience of many different adults from many different settings, we can give the next generation of young people the opportunities they need to meet their full potential. The Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental framework has clear implications for schools, youth organizations, and families; but without larger transformations in the policy landscape and larger societal and economic context, there are limits to what UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework can be achieved. Many questions remain about how 3. Ensuring all young people have access to a multi- to more effectively support the development of young tude of rich developmental experiences is impera- people and what policies and structural changes are tive to their success. Growing up in marginalized needed; these form the basis for the research agenda communities adds to the complexity of developing into needed to guide these transformations. Along with a young adult who is poised for success. While having parents and families, the world we envision for the agency equips young people to make choices and take next generation of young people will require the joint action, their ability to successfully pursue a desired efforts of educators and youth practitioners, policy- path also depends on social relationships, financial makers, and researchers. Below we provide implications resources, and countless other external factors that for teachers, youth practitioners, parents and families, are inequitably distributed. Further, the task of “in- policymakers, and researchers. tegrating” one’s identity is vastly more complicated for low-income youth and youth of color than it is for Implications for Educators, Youth Practitioners, and Parents and Families 1. A narrow focus on content knowledge in isolation from the other foundational components undermines learning and development. Learning and development are holistic processes dependent on interactions among all of the foundational components (self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values). There may be conceptual reasons for distinguishing between “cognitive” and “noncognitive” factors, but this distinction has no functional meaning. Cognition, emotion, affect, and behavior are reflexive, mutually reinforcing, and inextricably associated with one another as a part of development and learning. Adults will make little headway if they target only one particular component or subcomponent in isolation. 2. Taking a developmental lens is essential to ensuring children who grow up within the social and behavioral norms of the dominant white, middle-class culture.6 Responding to this reality requires a careful balance of pragmatism and aspiration. The Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental framework is designed to strike a balance between helping youth thrive in the world as it is, and develop the skills and dispositions they need to challenge a profoundly unjust status quo.7 Implications for Education and Youth Policy 1. The current policy emphasis on content knowledge and test-based accountability undermines practitioners’ ability to provide developmental experiences. Content knowledge is an essential part of what young people need to learn for the future, whether in school, at home, or in afterschool programs, but it is far from the only thing that matters. Policies that put too great an emphasis on content knowledge and standardized tests create incentives for practitioners to see the that structures and practices meet the developmental teaching of content knowledge as the sole outcome of needs of the young people being served. Although a interest. As this report has shown, the other foun- lot is known about development, too often, there is dational components not only facilitate engagement a mismatch between the structures or practices in and learning of content knowledge, but they also are a youth setting and the developmental needs of the important developmental outcomes in and of them- young people being served. Schools, youth programs, selves. Policies that promote these other foundational and even families are too often oriented to adult components would help to create conditions that needs and goals (e.g., maintaining classroom disci- foster both the learning of academic content and the pline) instead of taking a youth-centered approach. development of young people more holistically. 6 Deutsch (2008); Fedelina Chávez & Guido-DiBrito (1999); Phinney (1989); Phinney & Rosenthal (1992). 7 This report does not directly address how development of the key factors and foundational components may play out differently for different groups (e.g., by gender, sexual Executive Summary orientation, immigrant status, involvement in the juvenile justice system) and what specific barriers, assets, and needs each subgroup may have. This is a critical area of investigation that should be pursued. 7 2. Proceed carefully with incorporating “noncognitive” measures into accountability systems. The policy 8 Gaps in the Research 1. What practices and strategies promote the devel- window for a more holistic approach to the develop- opment of identity and agency? While researchers ment and learning of young people is opening; there have learned a tremendous amount about develop- is growing discontent over standardized testing. ment in the last several decades, many questions Recently, a movement to integrate alternative remain unanswered. In this report, we provided measures of student success into school accountabil- a developmental trajectory for the key factors for ity systems has gained some momentum, exemplified young adult success—agency, an integrated identity, by the California “CORE” districts that have received and competencies. However, this relied on piecing No Child Left Behind waivers allowing them to together a number of existing theories; rarely if ever include social-emotional factors and school climate has the development of agency, for example, been measures in place of test scores as accountability studied longitudinally from early childhood through metrics. This holistic approach to evaluating stu- young adulthood. Theory has provided guidance on dents is in alignment with the Foundations for Young how an early sense of “self” underlies later identity Adult Success developmental framework; however, formation, but this area is understudied in empirical some caution is necessary when using these new research. While there is converging evidence that measures for accountability purposes. Many impor- supports each of the developmental experiences we tant questions remain about measuring noncognitive identify in this report, as well as the importance of or social-emotional factors and about their suitabil- developmental relationships, we do not know which ity for an accountability system that was developed specific combination of experiences would best around standardized tests. 8 promote the formation of an integrated identity and 3. Policy needs to provide the “safe space” for schools agency. We also still lack a strong understanding of and out-of-school programs to become learning how all of the foundational components outlined organizations. The ambitious vision given in the here link directly to the development of agency, an Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental framework does not provide a clear roadmap of spe- integrated identity, and competencies. 2. What can be done to intervene with young cific practices, strategies, or programs to implement. people after developmental windows close? The Moving from the current approach to schooling to a Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental more holistic and developmentally aligned approach framework includes four foundational components— will require trial and error. Just as young people self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and need opportunities to tinker and practice in order values—which are all crucial factors in a person’s to learn, practitioners also need opportunities for development toward optimal capacity. What happens tinkering and practicing, as well as making mistakes, if youth do not grow each of these foundational com- as they learn new ways of teaching and working with ponents in the developmental period during which young people. In an age when accountability is a they are most malleable? What types of interven- dominant way of managing schools, and increasingly tions should we invest in—and for whom and at what out-of-school programs as well, the space to make period in their lives—if children seem to be falling mistakes is very small. For real shifts to happen in behind? And for the youngest children, how can we practice, schools and out-of-school programs need even be sure that a child is falling outside of “norma- to become learning organizations that provide tive” development, given how very wide the range of opportunities for adults to learn, and policy needs development is during the early years? to provide the “safe space” to do so. 8 See Duckworth & Yeager (2015) for a discussion of the uses and limitations of existing measures. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework 3. What is the interaction of experiences in different a case such as this, there is great potential for measure- settings? This report also raises a number of ques- ment instruments to be misused, to produce faulty data, tions about the experiences youth encounter in the to conflate statistical significance with meaningfulness, various settings they inhabit on a daily basis. We or to otherwise lead practitioners down a fruitless path. know quite well that what youth experience in school We strongly urge caution in the use of measurement tools often varies from their experiences with friends, at until the science of measuring these important constructs home, or even in other educational settings. What we catches up with the interest in and demand for them. do not know is the extent to which those experiences need to be coordinated and supportive of each other, Conclusion even if they are not teaching the same skills. How The Foundations for Young Adult Success developmen- much do practices at home support or inhibit what tal framework is a first step in guiding practitioners, teachers, youth workers, and others aim to do with policymakers, parents, and researchers in working youth? How aligned do those practices need to be? together around a vision of building a society where all And can effective practices in one setting ameliorate children grow up to reach their full potential regard- negative experiences in another setting? less of differences in their backgrounds. Ensuring 4. How can the key factors and foundational components best be measured for different purposes? Measurement is a core part of evaluating needs and gauging progress in any field. With the growing interest in factors other than academic content knowledge and skills, the number of assessments created to measure these factors has also grown. As discussed in the policy implications section, a number of questions about these factors and the assessments complicate their immediate implementation into practice. Some key questions include: Is this factor best conceived as an individual characteristic that can be cultivated over time or as a situational response to particular settings, opportunities, or expectations? How can we disentangle young people’s prior capacities from changes induced by setting factors such as adult practice, opportunities for developmental relationships and developmental experiences, or the culture and climate of the place? What is the developmental trajectory on these measures and what are thresholds that young people grow into successful young adults requires investments in their learning and development from birth to young adulthood so that all of them have ongoing opportunities to truly reach their potential. Making this vision a reality will require a collective responsibility for all young people. It means asking practitioners to question their own beliefs about what is possible and rethink how they work with young people on a day-to-day basis. It means asking policymakers to focus on a bigger picture and broader set of outcomes and to consider policies that would support the efforts of practitioners in developing young people. It means asking researchers to provide accessible, meaningful, and actionable answers to core questions of policy and practice. It means asking families to understand the needs of their children and work with the institutions they cross everyday so that these needs are met. It means asking for change within existing institutions and structures while also asking what new institutions and structures might better serve our vision. Addressing for what young people need? the inequities of opportunities facing young adults will In short, the demand for measures of noncognitive capacity to navigate the world as it exists now, it will or social-emotional factors has far outpaced the state of mean that they are also able to envision and create a the field of measurement for these same constructs. In better world for future generations. Executive Summary require more than equipping young people with the 9 10 INTRODUCTION Defining Success in Young Adulthood Every society in every age needs to grapple with the question of what outcomes it hopes to produce in raising its young. This seems particularly critical for adults who devote their lives to improving children’s education and development. What exactly do we hope our children will be able to accomplish as adults? What vision guides our work? How do we make that vision a reality for all children? As a nation we make enormous investments in our Success developmental framework (see Figure 1), which youth. But for many young people, inequities in the dis- depicts what youth need to be prepared for adulthood. tribution of resources and social and economic barriers It utilizes ideas from well-established theorists such as mean that they will not reach their full potential. How John Dewey and Erik Erikson to cutting-edge findings do we better harness what is known in the research, from neuroscience about how people learn. This report practice, and policy arenas to ensure that all youth incorporates a wide array of evidence to highlight the have what they need to successfully meet the complex types of experiences adults should provide for youth to challenges of young adulthood and become thriving, help them in developing to their full potential. contributing members of their communities? In this report we focus on the key role that develop- To address these questions, this report aims to build mental experiences and developmental relationships a common understanding of young people’s develop- play in supporting a child’s long-term success, while mental needs from early childhood through young keeping in mind variations in children’s individual adulthood. Preparing all youth for meaningful, produc- development over time. Young people’s needs and capa- tive futures requires coordinated efforts and intention- bilities change as they grow up, and attending to their al practices by adults across the many settings youth ongoing development is an essential part of support- inhabit on a daily basis—whether in school, at home, ing youth. In bringing all of these pieces together, this or in organized community programs. 9 Building off report recognizes that young people inhabit a multitude of previous frameworks and literature reviews, of settings on a daily basis where they develop, grow, 10 this report provides a new synthesis of knowledge gathered and learn, and that broader societal contexts, systems, through a review of the literature and interviews of and institutions also shape youth development—often experts from youth development, psychology, sociol- creating big disparities in opportunities and outcomes. ogy, pediatrics, economics, education, and the cognitive Our focus here is on the experience of children growing sciences to generate the Foundations for Young Adult up in the United States in the early 21st century.11 We 9 Hill, Campbell, & Harvey (2000); Irby, Pittman, & Tolman (2003). 10 For example, Farrington et al. (2012); National Research 11 While some aspects of child and adolescent development may Council and Institute of Medicine (2002); Pellegrino & Hinton (2012). Introduction be common across different countries, cultures, or time periods, we are not making claims that the findings or framework apply outside of the experience of young people in the United States in the early 21st century. 11 FIGURE 1 UChicago CCSR Framework for What Youth Need to Make a Successful Transition to Adulthood Developmental Experiences Can Happen in All Settings HOME ENCOUNTER 12 ENVISION INTEGRATE Values are enduring, often culturally-defined, beliefs about what is good or bad and what one thinks is important in life. Values serve as broad guidelines for living and provide an orientation for one’s desired future. Key Factors Y C EN ACTION REFLECTION SE Being successful means having the Agency to make active choices about one’s life path, possessing the Competencies to adapt to the demands of different contexts, and incorporating different aspects of oneself into an Integrated Identity. R VA L U E S REFLECTION TINKER Mindsets are beliefs and attitudes about oneself, the world, and the interaction between the two. They are the lenses we use to process everyday experience. WLEDGE KNOSK I LLS & CONNECT EG CO L F- O R E G U LATI MPE TENC TITY CHOOSE Knowledge is sets of facts, information, or understanding about self, others, and the world. Skills are the learned ability to carry out a task with intended results or goals, and can be either general or domain-specific. DS M IN ETS IDEN EVALUATE ACTION Self-Regulation includes awareness of oneself and one’s surroundings, and managing one’s attention, emotions, and behaviors in goal-directed ways. ED DESCRIBE INT Foundational Components AT CONTRIBUTE Over time, through developmental experiences, children build four foundational components, which underlie three “key factors” to success. AG Developmental Experiences Require Action and Reflection PRACTICE ORGANIZED ACTIVITIES SCHOOL N IE S hope that a common understanding of the needs and 73 percent and 69 percent, for Latinos and African strengths of young people will encourage coordinated Americans, respectively, and 72 percent for economi- efforts and intentional practices by adults across set- cally disadvantaged students.13 Furthermore, having tings, enabling a more cohesive system of supports for a high school diploma does not ensure employment, healthy development, better preparing young people and the economic prospects are dim for those without a from all walks of life for productive futures. post-secondary degree or training. Disparities in higher Defining “Success” in Young Adulthood education, combined with the effects of economic inequality, disadvantaged neighborhoods, unstable labor With rising income inequality, the gap in the invest- markets, and troubled K-12 schools, mean that a large ments that families of differing income levels are able percentage of youth—particularly those in low-income to make in their children has widened.12 As a result, and racial/ethnic minority communities—face a future the experiences and opportunities young people have with starkly diminished economic opportunities.14 to grow and develop vary greatly by the circumstances Given the harsh economic prospects facing youth with they are born into. Most policy efforts attempt to limited education, school reformers and policymakers address socioeconomic gaps in outcomes by focusing have argued that it is not enough for American students on educational attainment as the central investment to earn a high school diploma; they must be prepared in preparing youth for adulthood. This approach has to continue their education to and through college.15 yielded some gains; national high school completion College completion has become the marker not just for rates have risen to 80 percent, but there continue to be individual success, but for the country as a whole. In the gaps by race/ethnicity and income. Eighty-six percent context of waning American advantage in a competitive of white students complete high school compared to global marketplace, the education policy narrative is 12 Chetty et al. (2014a), Chetty et al. (2014b); Reardon (2011). 13 Stetser & Stillwell (2014). 14 Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013); Duncan & Murnane (2011). 15 Achieve, Inc. (2012); Education Trust (2012). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework often framed in terms of developing workers for 21st cen- Educators and youth service providers recognize tury jobs. In President Obama’s words, “America cannot that getting an education and a job are critically im- lead in the 21st century unless we have the best educated, portant outcomes; however, they generally have a much most competitive workforce in the world.” broader conception of the goals of their work—and what 16 Building an educated workforce is one of the core the measures of success ought to be. Regardless of the goals of our investments in young people, but it is far specific mission of the organization in which they work, from the only goal. Our investments shape the contribu- these adults often articulated their larger role as helping tions future adults can make to their families and com- young people develop an awareness of themselves and of munities, their ability to engage in civic life, and how the wide range of options before them, competencies to they view their role in society. Particularly when we pursue those options, and the ability to make good future move from the perspective of the policymaker to that choices for their lives as engaged citizens in the world. of a parent, we would define success for our children This larger focus is inseparable from goals related to beyond just college and career. We want our children to college and career. Thus, young adult success potentially be happy, healthy, and confident in themselves, and to encompasses different meanings for different people have whatever preparation they need to become caring and background, culture, values, and geography shape adults with meaningful work, family and friends who an individual’s definition of a successful life. love them, and a strong connection to the community. Going to college or other post-secondary training, par- This broader developmental perspective is often shared ticularly for students with no other access to well-paying by teachers, counselors, afterschool providers, coaches, work, has a core role in young adult success for many peo- ministers, scout leaders, arts educators, and other ple, but self-advancement is only part of the story of young youth workers. We interviewed many of these practice adult success. “Success” goes beyond fulfilling individual experts as part of this report (see box entitled Project goals and extends to having the agency and competencies Overview and Methodology on p.17), and found that to influence the world. We need to develop facile thinkers, people in these professions generally value the unique inventors, and problem-solvers with not only deep content gifts that youth bring to the world and want to help chil- knowledge, but also the creativity and flexibility to apply dren and teenagers realize their own potential across their knowledge to novel situations.18 We need to prepare multiple spheres. This belief was articulated by many young people to address global challenges and alleviate of the experts we talked with as we began this project: human suffering.19 So too do we want to develop thoughtful and informed citizens who can continue to pursue the Our ultimate goal for the students we serve ideals of democracy that have led our country for almost is simple. By age 25, we expect [them] to be 250 years. From this perspective, preparing adolescents capable of making real choices to pursue the for adulthood means cultivating young people’s critical life and career they want to lead. In other thinking skills, building their knowledge of democratic words, the end goal is agency. It’s what I— institutions and processes, and nurturing in them a sense as a parent—want for my daughter. We want of service to their communities and engagement in the the same exact thing for the students we political process. 20 The conception of success we use work with today. We don’t care if our alumni in this report thus has both an individual and a societal choose to be doctors, or teachers, or politi- element. It is not simply about meeting one’s own goals; cians, but we do intend to ensure they have success is also about contributing to a larger good, having the capacity to do what they independently a meaningful place within a community, and working want to do. —Jeff Nelson, CEO, OneGoal17 toward a positive change in the world. 16 The U.S. White House, Remarks on Higher Education, April 24, 2009. 17 UChicago CCSR interview with Jeff Nelson, CEO, OneGoal, January 14, 2014. Introduction 18 Pellegrino & Hilton (2012). 19 Wagner & Compton (2012). 20 Gould (2011); U.S. Department of Education (2012). 13 What Leads to Adult Success? entering the workforce, getting married, having chil- A Set of Key Factors and Foundational Components dren, or moving to a new community. Thus the devel- is Necessary for Youth to be Poised for a Successful opment of these three key factors is the central task of Transition into Adulthood raising and educating young people to prepare them for To fulfill this broader definition of success, the question the life changes that can begin in young adulthood. is not only what courses students should take in school, what test scores they need, or what facts or formulas ment of agency, integrated identity, and competencies? they ought to know, but also what kinds of experi- Through a review of the literature and interviews with ences young people need to prepare them to meet both experts, we have identified four foundational compo- inward-looking goals for creating a meaningful life and nents that are precursors to the key factors of young more outward-facing goals such as getting a good job or adult success. We have included both cognitive and non- contributing to their communities. cognitive factors in the foundational components. James In this report, we define a person who is ready to make 14 What are the components that underlie the develop- Heckman’s initial conceptualization of the role of non- a successful transition into young adulthood as having cognitive factors in adult outcomes greatly furthered three key factors: the agency to take an active role in our understanding of what contributes to young adult shaping one’s path, the ability to incorporate different success. 21 However, emphasizing a separation between aspects of oneself into an integrated identity, and the cognitive and noncognitive factors does little to illumi- competencies needed to effectively navigate a range of nate how to effectively prepare young people for future social contexts. Having agency means having the ability success; cognitive and noncognitive factors interact to make choices and take an active role in managing one’s with each other to contribute to learning and growth. life path, rather than being solely the product of one’s cir- Many frameworks of competencies and cognitive cumstances. This definition of agency acknowledges that and noncognitive factors have been put forth in recent external factors form very real constraints, and also that years. The foundational components presented here people have the will and the power to influence external provide broad categories that organize and underlie factors and can make choices about how to respond to the elements of these existing frameworks. Thus, the constraints. Having an integrated identity means having Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental a core sense of who one is, including a sense of continuity framework is designed to help translate these different with one’s past and future possibilities. Competencies elements into an action plan for development, rather are the abilities that enable people to effectively perform than to supplant other frameworks. roles, complete complex tasks, or achieve specific objec- The four foundational components are: self-regu- tives to achieve success. Young adults require competen- lation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values . cies in order to adapt to the demands of different settings Self-regulation includes awareness of oneself and and be productive and effective within them. one’s surroundings, and the management of one’s Developing the three key factors of agency, an inte- attention, emotions, and behaviors in goal-directed ways. grated identity, and competencies in multiple contexts Knowledge comprises sets of facts, information, or un- is likely to be a lifelong endeavor, but their foundations derstandings about the self, others, and the world. Skills lie in childhood and adolescence. Adolescence is the last are the learned ability to carry out a task with intended stage of major developmental growth and is often the results or goals, and can be either general or domain- time of the last interaction with the education system; specific. Mindsets are beliefs and attitudes about oneself as young people enter young adulthood they begin to and the external world; they are the default lenses we navigate the larger world and meet milestones such as use to process everyday experience. Values are lasting 21 Heckman & Rubinstein (2001). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework ideas or principles, often culturally defined, about what they inhabit; these limitations are a critical part of the is good or bad and what one considers important in life. story of education and development. Values serve as broad guidelines for living and provide an orientation for one’s desired future. Thus, there is a fundamental tension between preparing children to live in the world that is—which is Each of the foundational components plays an often cast as a tacit acceptance of a profoundly unjust important role in the development and enactment of status quo—and equipping them to face, navigate, and an integrated identity, agency, and competencies. challenge the inequitable distributions of resources and access that so often limit their opportunities and Context Plays a Crucial Role in Providing Equal constrain their potential. While adults need to be Opportunities to All Youth pragmatic in their work with kids and acknowledge the The inspiring picture of young people as self-actualized inequities in opportunities afforded youth, they should masters of destiny is complicated by persuasive research also be aspirational. How can we design and enact prac- on the role of context in shaping youth outcomes, specif- tices with schools, youth organizations, families, and ically, structural forces that govern socioeconomic life communities that not only prepare young people for in the United States (e.g., segregation, discrimination, the “real world,” but that also inspire and equip them to joblessness). From this perspective, a young person is create a better world? How can we ensure that all youth fundamentally the product of his experiences and social develop a repertoire of competencies that would enable interactions; he is subject to cultural norms, within and them to confront injustice and work toward a more across a range of contexts, from the immediate setting inclusive society? At the heart of this project has been to larger institutions, all of which collectively shape the vision of young adults with an integrated identity, the developing individual and the options before him. 23 with the agency to actively shape their life path, and the These larger contextual factors of society, the economy, competencies that allow them to pursue both individual and institutions (such as schools) play a central role in and larger social goals, and who have developed deep the inequitable opportunities afforded to young people, relationships with friends, family, and the commu- as well as in their ability to see opportunities as viable nity. While teachers, parents, and other youth workers options and to take advantage of them. While having must recognize and prepare young people for the real agency equips young adults to make choices and take constraints they will face in society, we should not action, the ability to pursue a desired path also de- be content to merely prepare youth to fill a slot in the pends on social relationships, financial resources, and world that is. 22 countless other external factors that are inequitably It is within these tensions that we explore a rich distributed. Thus, youth growing up in marginalized theoretical tradition and broad multidisciplinary communities have grossly different opportunities to evidence from research and practice about the under- build skills and competence, and their options for the lying constructs that support a successful transition future may be severely constrained. Further, the task of into young adulthood. We approach this by considering “integrating” one’s identity is vastly more complicated how well the key factors for young adult success would for low-income youth and youth of color as they interact equip young people from under-resourced communities with the cultural and behavioral norms of a dominant to navigate complex institutional environments and white, middle-class culture than it is for children who confront structural inequalities. grow up within that culture. 24 The obstacles to follow- To that end, Chapter 1 provides an extensive over- ing a successful path to adulthood and the opportunities view of the key factors for young adult success and available to young adults vary greatly by the contexts the foundational components underlying them. The 22 Bowles & Gintis (1976, 2002); Duncan & Murnane (2011); 23 Neal & Neal (2013); Bronfenbrenner (1977, 1979, 1986). 24 Deutsch (2008); Fedelina Chávez & Guido-DiBrito (1999); Lewis (2011); Massey & Denton (1993); Putnam (2015); Wilson (1990, 2012). Introduction Phinney (1989); Phinney & Rosenthal (1992). 15 chapter starts with an in-depth discussion of agency, be nurtured in childhood and adolescence, with an integrated identity, and competencies, and addresses why emphasis on developmental experiences set within these factors are crucial to creating and maintaining a the context of developmental relationships. Chapter productive and satisfying adult life; these three factors 3 addresses the question of when the foundational serve as our “north star” throughout the report. We components and key factors develop, as we look at key then describe and review each of foundational compo- developmental tasks from early childhood to young nent that underlies these key factors, making a case for adulthood (ages 3 to 22). In the final chapter, we sum- why each component is considered foundational in the marize the implications of this framework for practice, development of agency and integrated identity as well as policy, and research. Throughout the remainder of in supporting competency development. In Chapter 2, this report, we open each chapter with the key points we focus on how these foundational components can of the chapter. 16 UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Project Overview and Methodology In November 2013, the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research (UChicago CCSR) was awarded a competitive grant from the Wallace Foundation to build a conceptual framework that articulates what is needed to guide children and youth to become successful young adults. The charge was to analyze and synthesize the best of research evidence, theory, expert opinion, and practice wisdom in the service of identifying the broad range of factors critical for young adult success. We were to consolidate current understanding of how these factors can be fostered in schools, communities, and homes from early childhood to young adulthood. In addition to a thorough grounding in published research, our work involved talking to experts in research and practice across a range of fields and disciplines. We sought to find the points of agreement across disparate perspectives, raise the points of contention, and leverage the collective wisdom of diverse lines of research, practice, and theory to best understand the full scope of factors essential to young adult success. 1. How do the critical factors identified in Phase I develop from early childhood through young adulthood? The Three Phases of the Project 1. What are the key setting components and experiences youth need to support the development of each factor in each stage of life? To achieve a cohesive and comprehensive framework, the project team undertook three phases of information-gathering, with each successive phase built upon the work of the previous one. Each phase was defined by a different goal and set of questions: 2. What are the most salient areas of development during each stage of early life based on research and practice knowledge of “normative” development? 3. What do we know about the roles that youth’s environments and important others (including caregivers and other adults) play in supporting successful development during each stage of development? • Phase III: We aimed to consolidate current understanding of how critical factors of young adult success can be fostered in a holistic, coordinated way across schools, community organizations, and homes, from early childhood to young adulthood. We focused on a ground-level, practitioner perspective in considering how to best organize adult efforts to promote the development of children and youth. Our work during this phase focused on the following key questions: 2. What should adults consider as they are designing effective practice with developing youth? • Phase l: We focused on defining “success” and identifying the factors that are critical for success in young adulthood, particularly in college and at the beginning of a career. Questions included: 3. How do intentional practices interact with youth experiences to lead to positive development and learning? 1. What does a successful young adult look like? Methods 2. What characteristics, attitudes, skills, and behaviors help people succeed in typical young adult settings? During each phase, the team used several modes of information-gathering. First, we analyzed and synthesized the best theory and empirical evidence, focusing on highly-cited research and recommended publications. As part of this work, we reviewed over 20 existing models and frameworks that focus on “noncognitive” factors, inter- and intra-personal competencies, and social-emotional skills in adolescence and young adulthood. Second, we interviewed and held meetings with research and practice experts with specific knowledge in areas related to each phase of our work (see Appendix for a list of names). These experts included researchers from different fields and disciplines (e.g., psychology, business, education, sociology, economics) as well as policymakers and practitioners from a range of organizations (e.g., 3. What institutional, societal, and economic forces should we consider as we develop a framework for the critical factors needed to promote young adult success? • Phase II: Building on the critical factors identified in Phase l, we sought to understand how each factor developed over the course of early life, from the preschool years through young adulthood. We focused on the identification of leverage points for best supporting children’s holistic development, keeping in mind that child and youth development occurs in multiple settings. Questions included: Introduction 17 PROJECT OVERVIEW AND METHODOLOGY...CONTINUED 18 programs and providers focusing on college access and support, workforce development, K-12 education, after-school and extended learning time, community connections with schools, early childhood, and family support services). These experts were identified through our literature review, as well as through our professional networks in academia and the practice realm. We also interviewed experts who were recommended to us by our original interviewees. Third, we continuously synthesized research and interview data in weekly group meetings to determine the points of agreement and points of contention across disparate perspectives. Fourth, we held a number of meetings throughout the project, including two larger convenings of research and practice experts to evaluate and offer feedback to advance our work. We incorporated this feedback to improve the framework and our synthesis. Fifth, we interviewed nine diverse youth and the adults who work with them in schools, community programs, and agencies in Chicago. We used these interviews to highlight developmental experiences and surface real-life challenges young people are facing as they navigate across contexts. We also wrote biographical profiles from these interviews to illustrate how youth create narratives about their experiences. The youth profiles further informed our model. Each phase of work culminated in internal working documents to help us consolidate our progress and thinking. The white paper that resulted from Phase I, A Framework for Developing Young Adult Success in the 21st Century: Defining Young Adult Success, is available at http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/sites/default/ files/publications/Wallace%20Framework%20 White%20Paper.pdf The current report is a culmination of the three phases of work outlined above, with an emphasis on our learnings from Phases I and II. Findings from Phase III will be more fully explored in future work. We present here our conceptualization of “success” in young adulthood, our resultant conceptual framework of foundational components and key factors for success in young adulthood, implications for practice in a range of settings in which children and youth spend their time, gaps in the existing knowledge and literature, and future directions for research. We designed this final report as an actionable document that can organize and guide the strategic direction and inform the daily work of practitioners and policymakers. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework CHAPTER 1 What are the Ingredients of “Success”? Key Points • Success in young adulthood depends on more than “college and career” success; a definition of success should include the multi-faceted ways individuals may seek meaning in life and contribute to the world. • We organize the definition of young adult success around three key factors; these are agency, integrated identity, and competencies—and four foundational components that underlie them: selfregulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values. • The role of the foundational components is threefold: when young people have experiences and make meaning of those experiences, each component interacts to promote the development of the other foundational components and the three key factors; they enable healthy and productive functioning at every stage of life; and they directly contribute to young adult success. • The four foundational components and three key factors are closely interrelated in supporting how young people act in the world and make meaning of an experience. Understanding this interrelationship can help adults provide integrative opportunities for youth to act and reflect in ways that make the most of developmental experiences, rather than targeting only one particular component or factor in isolation. • Noncognitive and cognitive factors should not be considered independently; they interact with each other to promote and mutually reinforce development and learning. Both are a core part of how students learn. • The experiences that youth encounter are always embedded within larger societal, economic, and institutional contexts that influence how youth perceive the opportunities and obstacles posed by their environments. What are the ingredients necessary for young adults to ent tasks (competencies). The three key factors allow a succeed? Building a common set of objectives and hav- young adult to manage and adapt to changing demands ing a clear understanding of how to foster development and successfully navigate various settings with differ- is a critical step in eliminating the silos that adults ent cultures and expectations. While recognizing the working with young people often operate within. This economic imperative of going to college, particularly project proposes a framework of foundational compo- for youth with no other access to well-paying work, nents and key factors for success in young adulthood. we define success in young adulthood beyond the Drawing from a review of the literature, both empirical more narrow notion of “college and career” success and theoretical, and the knowledge of a wide range of to acknowledge and embrace the multi-faceted ways expert contributors, this report organizes the defini- individuals may seek meaning in life and contribute to tion of young adult success around three key factors; the world. Adolescent psychiatrists Hazen, Schlozman, these are agency, integrated identity, and competencies. and Beresin have described the successful culmination These factors capture how a young adult poised for of adolescence as resulting in “a biologically mature success interacts with the world (agency), the internal individual equipped with a sense of an independent self, compass that a young adult uses to make decisions the capacity to form close peer and group relationships, consistent with her values, beliefs, and goals (integrated and the cognitive and psychological resources to face the identity), and how she is able to be effective in differ- challenges of adult life.” 25 25 Hazen, Scholzman, & Beresin (2008, p. 167). Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? 19 At the core of this project is a vision of young adults mindsets, and values. The role of each of these foun- who, regardless of where they grow up, meet the chal- dational components is threefold. First, when young lenges and joys of life with agency, possess an integrated people have experiences and make meaning of those identity that gives them a core sense of who they are, experiences, each component interacts to promote the and have the competencies that allow them to pursue development of the other foundational components and both individual and larger social goals. These three key the three key factors. Second, they enable healthy and factors allow a young adult to accomplish a wide range productive functioning at every stage of life. Finally, of goals, including achieving success in school or work, they directly contribute to young adult success. The maintaining a physically and psychologically healthy foundational components develop as they are used. lifestyle, and having deep relationships with friends, Over time, self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mind- family, and other community members. In this chapter, sets, and values can become internalized as lenses for we focus on the transition from adolescence into young seeing the world or as automatic responses (or habits) adulthood. We explore both these key factors of young that become a core part of one’s identity; this automatic adult success and the foundational components that behavior supports the transfer of these foundational underlie them, which are the outcomes of interest in components across contexts. We elaborate on the four our Foundations for Young Adult Success developmen- foundational components later in this chapter. tal framework (see Figure 2). tion into young adulthood will be supported by the three key factors outlined above. We want to clarify, however, FIGURE 2 Key Factors and Foundational Components for Young Adult Success that a person can have agency, integrated identity, and INT competencies in one setting without being able to automatically transfer those to a new setting. A young woman setting (for example, as a college student). High school students might likewise exhibit persistence and strong Y C EN academic performance in a high school setting and then ACTION REFLECTION SE essentially fall apart when they go off to college. Indeed, educators in successful urban high schools have often CO expressed frustration at the difficulty of getting students’ confidence and good habits developed in high school to L F- O R E G U LATI MPE TENC TITY and competencies to act with agency in another role or WLEDGE KNOSK I LLS & performs at regular open-mics), but lack the identity IDEN in one role or setting (for example, as a songwriter who R ED a set of competencies that allow her to act with agency EG AT might enter young adulthood with a strong identity and M I ND S E T S VA L U E S As this chapter will articulate, a successful transi- AG 20 N IE S transfer to post-secondary settings. Ultimately, then, the task at hand for adults who work with youth is to help young people not only build their agency, identity, and Key Factors competencies in specific domains, but also help them to Agency leverage these strengths from one arena and transfer At the heart of successful young adulthood is the them to tackle challenges in new contexts. concept of agency. Agency means taking an active and Underlying the capacity for the three key factors intentional role in making choices and shaping and are four foundational components—a set of both cogni- managing the course of one’s life rather than being tive and noncognitive factors. The four foundational at the mercy of external forces. Agency is reliant on components are self-regulation, knowledge and skills, having an internal locus of control—the belief that you UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework have control over what happens to you in life. 26 Having the case in non-Western cultures. 29 Beyond varying agency also requires having the competencies to be able cultural interpretations of agency, a wide range of cul- to manage one’s environment, a sense of what one val- tural traditions, values, and expectations can play a con- ues, the ability to manage one’s emotions and behavior, straining or enabling role to the development of agency. as well as a belief that conscious self-directed action is Young people’s experiences are always embedded within possible. Philosopher Isaiah Berlin further elucidated larger societal, economic, and institutional contexts this concept: (see Figure 3), which influence how they perceive the opportunities and obstacles posed by their environ- [To be a rational agent is] to be a subject, ment. 30 Many young people in the United States face not an object; to be moved by reasons, by significant, very real challenges to developing agency conscious purposes, which are my own, not because of a range of factors stemming from these by causes which affect me, as it were, from broader structures and contexts; for example, exposure outside. I wish to be somebody, not nobody; to violence and high levels of stress, or limited access to a doer—deciding, not being decided for, experiences and opportunities that allow children and self-directed and not acted upon by external adolescents to explore, learn, and try on different roles nature or by other men as if I were a thing, and identities. 31 This means that for adults working with or an animal, or a slave incapable of playing young people—many of whom are facing obstacles to a human role, that is, of conceiving goals developing agency—being intentional about the develop- and policies of my own and realizing them…. ment of agency takes on greater significance in helping I wish, above all, to be conscious of myself youth reach their maximum potential as young adults. as a thinking, willing, active being, bearing responsibility for my choices and able to explain them by reference to my own ideas and purposes. 27 FIGURE 3 Development Occurs Within and Is Influenced by Various Settings and Contexts When young people, particularly those from marginalized communities, engage with the world, their capacity to act with agency is constrained and shaped own competencies. Agency allows one to confront the OL HO presented to them, to how others react to them, to their HO M C E S by a number of factors, from the opportunities that are challenges and barriers that are encountered in life, not agency and self-determination. This is not necessarily 26 Rotter (1990). 27 Berlin (1969, p. 131) cited in Moshman (2005, p. 92). 28 Heron (2008); Markus & Kitayama (1991). 29 Hernandez & Iyengar (2001). Agency can have a different focus in different cultures. In cultures that stress interdependence, Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? T- OF-SC HO O XT U S INDIVIDUAL L N O MU T X TE C N NITY CO TI IC CA M L, A O ND ECON M TE O C United States emphasizes the importance of personal LI O particular, the strong valuing of independence in the ,P cultural background and personal experiences. 28 In AL The individual expression of agency is shaped by O CI can be overcome. SO as fixed limits to what is possible, but as obstacles that people tend to define agency in terms of their relationships and perceive their behavior as being contingent on others. 30 Bronfenbrenner (1979); Markus & Kitayama (1991). 31 Emirbayer & Mische (1998). 21 Psychologist Albert Bandura expands our under- 22 psychoanalyst who developed one of the most widely standing of agency by defining four things it is com- applied theories of child and adolescent personality de- prised of: (1) intentionality that includes having an velopment, described identity formation in adolescence action plan and strategies for realizing it; (2) fore- and commitment to an identity in young adulthood thought to set goals and anticipate likely outcomes as central tasks of development. It is the process of an in order to guide and motivate actions; (3) self- individual linking childhood with adulthood in a way reactiveness so that one has the self-regulation, skills, that situates choice and agency within the individual. 35 and knowledge to carry out a course of action; and Ultimately, a person with a strong identity is able to (4) self-reflectiveness so that individuals are able to commit to all facets of the self. Identity, then, is “not reflect on their personal efficacy, examine the effec- just an attempt to describe one’s typical behavior; an tiveness and meaning of a course of action, and make identity is an account of the core beliefs and purposes adjustments if necessary. that one construes as explaining that behavior.” 36 32 Agency thus depends on a range of self-regulatory processes (awareness of the There is much disagreement among identity theo- self, metacognition, self-control) as well as knowledge rists as to whether identity formation is a process of dis- and skills across multiple domains, mindsets such as covery, construction, or creation. That is, to what extent self-efficacy, and a set of values to guide decision- is there is a true, innate self to be discovered vs. identity making. Each of these is included as foundational being forged from external forces of environment, ex- components in the Foundations for Young Adult perience, and culture vs. the extent to which we actively Success developmental framework, described in create our own identities through conscious action and more detail later in this chapter. Agency also depends interpretation. 37 A reasonable read of the literature is on having a set of competencies that allow one to navi- that it is some of each, and we see this process unfolding gate and make informed choices in a complex world, a through the stages of adolescence and young adulthood, concept we explore below. Finally, agency is aided when identity is both a matter of determining who one by having a strong sense of identity across time and is and a matter of deciding who one will be. multiple social identities. We turn to this idea next. Much about the formation of identity appears to have changed over the last several decades, as the available Integrated Identity options for the person one will become have increased The process of coming to know oneself starts early in significantly. Historically, youth transitioned directly life and continues throughout adulthood. Figuring out from adolescence into full adulthood as a function of who one is and developing one’s identity is a process of how society was organized, reaching milestones such internally integrating various aspects of the self (e.g., as entrance to the full-time workforce and entrance beliefs, values, goals, roles, experiences) to create a into marriage and starting a family by one’s early 20s. stable and consistent sense of one’s “wholeness.” This As described by James Côté, a sociologist who studies integration process aims toward a sense of continuity identity formation, young people were expected to enter with what one has experienced in the past and future ready-made roles in adult society; the transition to possibilities for who one may grow to be. adulthood was highly normatively structured by gender 33 The most active years for identity development fall during roles, religious beliefs, and socioeconomic status. 38 adolescence and the transition into young adulthood. 34 Career pathways were more defined and decisions about Erik Erikson, a developmental psychologist and and the timing of marriage and childbearing were more 32 Bandura (2006). 33 McAdams and Adler (2010) refer to this as a narrative identity 35 Erikson (1950/1963, 1968). 36 Moshman (2005, p. 86). 37 Moshman (2005). 38 Côté (1996); Schwartz, Côté, & Arnett (2005). or authorship. 34 In this paper, we use the term “young adulthood” to refer to young people in the transitional “post-secondary” period, roughly ages 19 to 22—while acknowledging that, for many, adulthood is still emerging at this age. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework constrained than they currently are. Thus, previously, adulthood,” 42 making the task of navigating multiple the identity challenge for young adults was to find ways contexts particularly complex. Identity development is to adapt to fixed roles. However, changes in Western a lifelong process, but the transition to adulthood is a industrialized societies have delayed young people’s critical juncture that positions young people for their entrance into many of the markers of adulthood that future; being able to draw one’s various strengths and helped to define the self. Researchers studying this new experiences into a more integrated sense of self helps phase of “emerging adulthood” (from the late teens into focus skills and efforts more effectively toward setting the 20s) have argued that the delay into adulthood has clear goals, pursuing opportunities, and achieving aims led to greater role ambiguity. 39 In the absence of clear that one sets. As young people are entering into new adult roles and social guidelines, making choices about environments and settings, an integrated identity helps relationships, education, work, values, and commit- to make this transition more successfully. EVIDENCE FROM OUTSIDE OF CHICAGO...CONTINUED ments is now viewed as a set of individual decisions Addressing conflicts that may exist between various rather than expected progressions into pre-defined identities can be a critical struggle for youth throughout adult roles. 40 This ambiguity surrounding the transi- adolescence and young adulthood. Context plays a critical tion to adulthood adds to the difficulty young people role through every stage of this story.43 In some cases, experience in developing a coherent and stable identity. the contexts in which youth live may vary from the con- Adult identity has multiple antecedents across time texts in which they strive to succeed.44 While developing and context. Children and youth develop many “selves” an integrated identity is a complex process for anyone, as they grow. They may take on different behaviors, for young people growing up in marginalized communi- linguistic styles, interests, styles of dress, and even ties, the task of reconciling different aspects of the self sets of values and self-perceptions in different settings. across multiple contexts may be particularly challenging. This is a very normal and important part of growing For example, a youth can have a well-developed identity up. Background characteristics such as race/ethnic- and set of competencies to navigate difficult terrain with ity, sexual orientation, gender, and social class also are peers in the neighborhood (for example, acting tough critical dimensions of identity formation, particularly or avoiding eye contact), but those strategies may be in for young people from marginalized communities. direct conflict with expectations in the workplace. One 41 Eventually, however, these different selves can become youth profiled in this project, Jermaine, a 20-year-old reconciled into a more coherent identity. senior at an alternative high school, has struggled to We refer to this process as developing an integrated keep a job because of conflicts with supervisors (see box identity—that is, having a sense of internal consistency Youth Profile: Jermaine on p.24). Being a worker under of who one is across time, across place, and across someone else’s rules did not fit with the identity he had multiple social realms. An integrated identity provides developed on the streets. Through an experience at a an internal framework for making sense of how one’s local community center, he began to forge an alternative choices and actions are related to one’s past, one’s identity. He has been playing the drums for pay at local current social identities, and one’s desired future. An churches for years, but until recently this was not some- integrated identity provides a stable base from which thing he shared with peers. His mentor at this community a young person can act in the world. If adolescents “do center invited him to play at a spoken word poetry event, not form a coherent sense of self and values, they will and he found himself thriving when interacting with kids lack a consistent sense of identity as they progress into his age who shared his artistic talents. 39 Arnett (2000, 2007). 40 Arnett (2000); Mayseless & Keren (2014). 41 Côté (2009); Phillips & Pittman (2003); Phinney (1989); Phinney & Rosenthal (1992). 42 Hazen, Scholzman, & Beresin (2008, p. 163). 43 Bronfenbrenner (1977, 1979, 1986). 44 Patton (2012). Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? 23 YOUTH PROFILE Jermaine Jermaine, 20, has been kicked out of three Chicago public high schools for fighting. The most recent time was a year ago when another youth came up behind him in the lunchroom. 24 “He balled up his face and got too close,” Jermaine recalls. perception of what being a man is. So a lot of time when he “I felt threatened.” Jermaine hit him, explaining that if is in new situations, he rebels.” he hadn’t, the other guy would have got him first. “If you don’t do it, then they will get you. That’s how the streets go.” Now a senior at an alternative school, he is trying to That attitude toward authority has gotten him fired from two of the three jobs he’s held so far. In one, a summer grounds-keeping job at his housing develop- turn his life around. Seeing some of his friends and rela- ment, the crew was directed to climb ladders and clean tives head off to college made him want to go, too. So he gutters. Jermaine objected to the strenuous work in the began doing his homework, going to class, and raising hot weather, especially since he hadn’t dressed for it his hand to ask for help when he needed it. Where his that day. He seems to have interpreted the directions to prior grades were Cs and Ds, in the fall semester of his perform the unwanted task as an attempt to dominate senior year he earned a 4.0. him. “I was like, ‘I’m not you-all slave.’” Unfortunately, he is undermining his school success Jermaine has at least one aspect of his identity that by using strategies for handling conflict with authority he keeps separate from his street persona. Since the age figures similar to those he uses to maintain his safety of five, he’s played the drums and now performs at local and status on the streets. church services for pay. “He’s the type of guy [that] would For instance, when a teacher recently reprimanded never want any of the other guys from the neighborhood him for talking in class, he cursed her out. “I’m older to know he goes to church,” his mentor notes, “let alone now, so I don’t take the disrespect,” he explained. “If you plays the drums at church.” disrespect me, I’m going to disrespect you back.” Jermaine, a tall, African American youth, can be His mentor recently invited him to a spoken word poetry event organized by two community youth disarmingly polite, even charming, when he chooses. groups. “Can I bring my drums? Can I play?” Jermaine But a mentor at the community center in the housing wanted to know. As his mentor explained, the experi- development where Jermaine lives observes, “Like most ence of performing with his peers “made it easier for teenagers that I run across, Jermaine looks at any form him to say ‘this is what I do.’ He is coming into his own of authority initially as a threat to his manhood or to his identity and being comfortable with it.” UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Competencies adult chooses to pursue, different competencies will have The third key factor for young adult success is compe- different saliency, though many such competencies (e.g., tencies. Competencies are abilities that enable people the ability to communicate, interact, and think critically) to successfully perform roles, complete complex tasks, are likely to be necessary for most everyone. or achieve specific objectives. Young adults require sets What is the difference between competencies and of competencies in order to be productive and effective skills? In the current report, we distinguish these in the in different settings and adapt to various demands. The following way: Skills refer to the discrete, learned ability last decade has seen an abundance of literature, models, to carry out a task with pre-determined results or goals. and frameworks (e.g., CASEL, Four Keys for College and Competencies, on the other hand, are the abilities to Career Success, 4C’s) identifying sets of core competen- adapt and enact skills in an applied way while drawing on cies that are crucial for adolescents transitioning into foundational components (self-regulation, knowledge, their young adult lives. mindsets, and values) to carry out a task. For example, 45 Since the start of the new millennium, scholars, youth advocates, and others have under our definition, being able to write is a skill. been calling attention to the skills demanded by the However, being able to write a persuasive letter to the globalized economy in the 21st century, emphasizing editor about a contentious issue is a competency—it draws that youth need a broader set of K-12 learning outcomes on knowledge about the topic, an understanding of one’s than content knowledge. Others have noted the need values and the message one wants to convey, an aware- for schools and other youth-serving institutions and ness of the audience, and a belief that one can persuade programs to develop social-emotional competencies others. It requires organizing these various components or creativity and innovation 47 46 as a complement to in a particular combination and applying them to meet academic knowledge and skills. There is much evidence the demands of a specific task for a specific purpose, mak- to support these calls. Interpersonal skills have been ing it a competency rather than a skill. associated with positive academic and developmen- While existing frameworks have value for identifying tal outcomes, as seen in the literature on high school particular competencies necessary for various settings, engagement 48 and on cooperative studying and student they largely overlook the set of foundational components integration in college. that these competencies rely upon. This is an important 49 Collaboration and positive communication are also highly valued in the workplace, gap, as these underlying skills and beliefs need to be at- as employers consistently state that communication is tended to and recognized for their critical role in youth one of the most valued traits in workers. 50 Other types development. To take one example, the Partnership for of behaviors, such as help-seeking, taking initiative, and 21st Century Skills created an influential framework getting involved in activities, can also play crucial roles focused on the competencies needed to engage in a post- in supporting youth’s attainment of their goals. industrial knowledge economy, centering on the 4C’s: 51 Across the myriad frameworks identifying the compe- Communication, Collaboration, Critical Thinking, and tencies youth need for a successful transition into college Creativity. 53 The term “21st century skills” has indeed or the workplace, there is a great deal of overlap concep- become shorthand for what young people need in order tually (even if the terminology is not always consistent). to succeed in today’s world and serves as new end goals in And while some competencies vary across educational, education and youth development. What the 4C’s frame- professional, and personal arenas, others are similarly work does not describe, however, is what underlies and valued across settings. enables these competencies. 52 Depending on the paths a young 45 The Collaborative for Building After-School Systems (2013); Conley (2014); Hewlett Foundation (2013); MHA Labs (2014); Pellegrino & Hilton (2012); Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009); Savitz-Romer & Bouffard (2012); Weissberg & Cascarino (2013). 46 Weissberg & Cascarino (2013). 47 Wagner & Compton (2012). Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? 48 Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris (2004); Pellegrino & Hilton (2012). 49 Astin (1993); Tinto (1997). 50 Pritchard (2013); International Youth Foundation (2013); Casner & Barrington (2006). 51 Conley (2012). 52 Lippman, Atziena, Rivers, & Keith (2008). 53 Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). 25 The many available frameworks and models that focus on core competencies for college and career often As described above, what lies at the core of the skip over the basic foundational components introduced Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental in this report—components that will be described in de- framework is the task of helping youth develop agency, tail in the next section. This represents a major distinc- an integrated identity, and competencies that allow a tion between the Foundations for Young Adult Success young adult to navigate across multiple contexts in life. developmental framework and other frameworks; our Acting with agency requires competencies to manage focus is on the basic ingredients other competencies one’s environment, as well as the mindset that this depend upon. For example, collaboration—one of the is possible. Building an integrated identity positions 4C’s—consists of working with others effectively and young adults for success and supports the utilization of respectfully toward a common goal. Being able to inter- their knowledge and skills toward their tangible goals act with others in a productive manner requires social that reflect their values. All three key factors rely on the awareness to be able to read and interpret social cues, strong development of four foundational components strategies to communicate appropriately, and the ability described here: self-regulation, knowledge and skills, to self-regulate in order to collaborate despite possibly mindsets, and values. disagreeing with others’ viewpoints. Collaboration re- 26 Foundational Components These foundational components were derived from quires both the flexibility to make compromises as well an extensive review of literature and ongoing con- as the ability to share responsibility for tasks and recog- versations with researchers and practitioners from a nize the value of others’ contributions. In these respects, range of fields. The focus was on both cognitive and collaboration builds upon a set of skills around working noncognitive factors; as pointed out in the earlier with others, but also requires particular mindsets—such UChicago CCSR report, Teaching Adolescents to Become as openness—that allow for an acceptance of ideas that Learners, 54 the division between cognitive and noncog- are not self-generated and a valuing of others’ contribu- nitive is extremely fluid, and each category of factors tions. The 4C’s heavily rely on knowledge, mindsets, is dependent on the other. 55 For example, being able to and self-regulation for skills to be implemented appro- collaborate with co-workers to plan an effective meet- priately and effectively—all of which are articulated as ing is considered a “noncognitive” competency, but it foundational components in our framework. relies on a range of factors from having the social skills The remainder of this chapter expands upon these to get along with others in the planning process and the foundational components that underlie a range of com- knowledge of the culture of one’s co-workers and work- petencies. The Foundations for Young Adult Success place (“cognitive” capacities). developmental framework can be used in conjunction In addition, the foundational components were cho- with other existing frameworks to help practitioners sen because they are malleable. In other words, the foun- better understand not only the higher-level competencies dational components in this framework can be changed necessary for success, but also the foundational skills and by experiences and the efforts of and interactions with beliefs that are critical to supporting growth and learning other people, in both positive and negative ways and in children and youth over the first two decades of life. then be internalized. This attention to malleability was 54 Farrington et al. (2012). 55 The Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental framework similarly aligns with UChicago CCSR’s Noncognitive Framework for Academic Success (Farrington et al., 2012). The 2012 report focuses on foundational skills and beliefs that are critical to supporting growth and learning in the classroom setting. The new framework presented in this report shows how the noncognitive factors highlighted in 2012 fit into a broader set of factors and a broader definition of success. This broader Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental framework also provides more detailed guidance on how adults and contexts can support youth in achieving their goals. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework intentional; ultimately, the goal of this work is to help relevant goals.” 58 For young adults, this means being practitioners, parents, program leaders, and other adults aware of oneself and one’s surroundings and manag- who work with children better understand how they can ing one’s own emotions and behaviors in ways that help best support development. The process of being changed move a young person closer to her goals. Various forms of by experiences and interactions, and internalizing them self-regulation include cognitive (including attentional), is core to identity development. We excluded factors such emotional, social, behavioral, and physiological regula- as temperament that, while influential on children’s tion. 59 There is a growing consensus that these various experiences and identity development, are believed to be forms of self-regulation are central to adaptive develop- biologically based and relatively stable over time. 56 ment 60 —development that allows for adjustment as one By clearly defining the malleable foundational com- proceeds through life—and necessary for both social and ponents that underlie agency, an integrated identity, cognitive success.61 Self-regulation allows a person to and competencies, the current framework is intended manage his focus toward an objective, a core part of be- to be used in conjunction with other work focused on ing able to act with agency.62 Because of the central role social-emotional learning, deeper learning competen- self-regulation plays in almost everything a person does, cies, noncognitive factors, and 21st century skills. The it not only underlies agency but also supports the ability foundational components are developed and expressed in to develop competencies that can be applied to various multiple spheres—within the self, in relation to others, and settings. Achieving any goal a person sets for himself, in the broader world(s) one inhabits. successfully interacting with others, and ultimately 57 The definitions of each are provided in Table 1 as a quick reference. We also being able to manage the integration of multiple selves describe how each foundational component supports the involves self-regulatory processes. key factors for success, and present evidence of the links The process of self-regulation requires a multitude between each component and later outcomes in young of skills; some are more physiological or cognitive in adulthood. Each foundational component enhances a nature (requiring the development of particular areas of young person’s ability to perceive experiences in ways that the brain), while others are more intentional. Literature encourage positive meaning-making and hence learning. suggests that there are two aspects of self-regulation that support successful interactions with others and the Self-Regulation world: self-control, which is cognitively controlled by Self-regulation is a set of internal processes that enable executive function (EF) skills, and awareness—of oneself, one to manage one’s own behavior, emotions, attention, other people, and one’s surroundings. and cognition while engaging with the world toward a goal. One comprehensive definition in the literature de- Elements of Self-Regulation scribes self-regulation as “the ability to flexibly activate, Self-control and the role of executive function skills. monitor, inhibit, persevere, and/or adapt one’s behavior, Self-regulatory processes “include the ability to delay attention, emotions, and cognitive strategies in response gratification, control impulses, pay attention, and stay on to direction from internal cues, environmental stimuli, and task.” 63 In particular, a set of cognitive functions called feedback from others, in an attempt to attain personally EF skills—attentional control, response inhibition, 56 Although these are not things that adults directly change domains has been put forth by other models and frameworks of skills necessary for success in the 21st century (e.g., Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012; Weissberg & Cascarino, 2013). 58 Moilanen (2007, p. 835). 59 See Bronson (2000) for a review. 60 Morrison, Ponitz, & McClelland (2010). 61 Flavell (1979); National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2000). 62 Zimmerman & Cleary (2006). 63 The Committee for Children (2011). easily, this does not mean that adults should not attend to these traits and consider them as they interact with youth. While temperament is biologically based—something you are born with, rather than something that develops over time— some aspects of temperament are more apt to interact with environments to lead to personality traits (Chess & Thomas, 1977; Goldsmith et al., 1987). 57 The notion that positive youth development requires skills in both the interpersonal (or social) and intrapersonal (or self) Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? 27 TABLE 1 Definitions of Key Factors and Foundational Components of Young Adult Success Key Factors These three factors support a successful transition into young adulthood and capture how one interacts with the world, sees and understands oneself, and is able to apply one’s capabilities to effect change. Agency is the ability to make choices about and take an active role in one’s life path, rather than solely being the product of one’s circumstances. Agency requires the intentionality and forethought to derive a course of action and adjust course as needed to reflect one’s identity, competencies, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values. Integrated Identity is a sense of internal consistency of who one is across time and across multiple social identities (e.g., race/ethnicity, profession, culture, gender, religion). An integrated identity serves as an internal framework for making choices and provides a stable base from which one can act in the world. Competencies are the abilities that enable people to effectively perform roles, complete complex tasks, or achieve specific objectives. Successful young adults have sets of competencies (e.g., critical thinking, responsible decision-making, collaboration) that allow them to be productive and engaged, navigate across contexts, perform effectively in different settings, and adapt to different task and setting demands. Foundational Components These are a set of cognitive and noncognitive components that underlie the three key factors. Each of the four components directly fosters learning and growth, while also reinforcing and enhancing the other foundational components. Each component and subcomponent has corollaries that apply to self, others, or the world. 28 Self-Regulation is a set of internal processes that enable one to manage one’s behavior, emotions, attention, and cognition while engaging with the world toward a goal. Selfregulation has numerous forms, including cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and attentional regulation. Literature suggests that there are two aspects of self-regulation that support successful interactions with others and the world: self-control, which is cognitively controlled by executive function skills, and awareness—of oneself, other people, and one’s surroundings. Knowledge is sets of facts, information, or understanding about oneself, others, and the world. Skills are the learned abilities to carry out a task with intended results or goals. Skills can be general or domain specific, and can be academic, technical, professional, cultural, or institutional in nature. Knowledge and Skills are developed over a lifetime, and individuals draw on them in everyday experiences, which help sustain other foundational components and build key factors. Mindsets are beliefs and attitudes about oneself, the external world, and the interaction between the two. They are the default lenses that individuals use to process everyday experiences. Mindsets reflect a person’s unconscious biases, natural tendencies, and past experiences. Though mindsets are malleable, they tend to persist until disrupted and replaced with a different belief or attitude. Values are ideals or beliefs about what is good or bad and what is desirable or undesirable. They are important, enduring, and often culturally defined. Values develop through a process of exploration and experimentation, where young people make sense of their experiences and refine what they hold as important ideals. Values serve as broad guidelines for roles and relationships, and provide an orientation for one’s desired future. cognitive flexibility, and working memory—are impor- back from responding in an angry way. As observers, tant for all types of self-regulation. we are able to see self-regulation play out through his 64 In fact, self-reg- ulation can be thought of as the enactment of EF skills (restrained) behaviors. But what underlies his ability to through behaviors. enact those behaviors is his self-control—the cognitive 65 Take, for example, two young men in a verbal disagreement. In an effort to end the ability to suppress his natural response, in this case, the disagreement, it takes a great amount of emotional and strong desire to continue arguing with someone. In the behavioral regulation for one of those young men to hold moment, he is capitalizing on his 64 Jones & Bailey (2012); Ponitz, McClelland, Matthews, & 65 Howse, Calkins, Anastopoulos, Keane, & Shelton (2003). Morrison (2009). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework underlying executive function skills—his ability to inhib- settings/contexts and their social rules); this awareness it automatic responses and think flexibly about ways to helps individuals determine appropriate behaviors for the improve the situation at hand. Without strong EF skills, particular social situation they are in (e.g., being empa- it is nearly impossible to self-regulate, leading to a host thetic toward someone who is struggling), and supporting of struggles for children, adolescents, or adults trying to the ongoing development of interpersonal competencies. develop agency, integrated identity, or competencies. As a person takes stock of his actions and the influence they have on others, it also helps him to consider the Awareness. Awareness is the conscious focusing of type of person he is—both in specific situations and more attention. Awareness can be directed toward different globally—feeding into an ongoing development of identity. objects, resulting in a greater understanding of oneself, Self-regulation, as a process, is key to identity develop- one’s interactions with others, and one’s environment. ment among young people because it forms a critical Awareness is the first step in the ability to self-regulate; to link between thinking about oneself and one’s goals and conduct appropriate, positive, and productive behaviors; preferences, thinking about one’s interaction with oth- and ultimately to help bridge the gap between identity ers, seeking out and reflecting on feedback, and making building and goal completion. In situations where a young choices about one’s current and future behavior. person is intentionally working toward a goal, self-regulation requires self-awareness so that she can self-monitor Self-Regulation and Its Relationship to Young and constantly reassess where she is in relation to that Adult Outcomes goal. It is important to note that in the literature and in 66 Not only does self-regulation require that we focus our attention on some aspect of either ourselves or our existing frameworks, there are many terms used environment, but it also requires reflecting on what we interchangeably with “self-regulation.” Some refer to are attending to. The absence of reflection results in lost constructs similar to the ones described above (e.g., opportunities to understand one’s experiences and inte- “emotional competency,” which includes awareness and grate them into a larger (meta) understanding of oneself identification of one’s own emotions 68 ), some refer to in multiple contexts—a topic that is discussed in greater cognitive capabilities that underlie self-regulation (e.g., detail in Chapter 2. In these ways, developing the ability executive function abilities such as inhibitory control), to objectively attend to one’s actions and reflect on them and still others combine our notion of self-regulation supports agency; it gives people the insight to adapt their with other skills and dispositions (e.g., “self-manage- efforts and ultimately achieve their goals. ment”). 69 Regardless of the various terms used, there is Metacognition is one specific type of self-awareness evidence that better self-regulation skills are related to that seems to be particularly critical for academic suc- a host of learning and development outcomes from early cess. Metacognition consists of the ability to be aware childhood through young adulthood. of or control one’s thinking and understanding so that In UChicago CCSR’s earlier monograph, Teaching one can develop strategies to direct thinking toward Adolescents to Become Learners, the authors noted that in appropriate goals. adolescence, self-regulated learners “monitor the process of 67 For example, a high school student who is studying for a test needs to be able to monitor her their learning, ascertain how effectively they are addressing level of understanding to know when she has studied a given learning task, and adjust their efforts accordingly.” 70 enough, or to recognize which parts of the material she For these older students, self-regulated learning is a goal- needs to spend more time with. oriented process in which adolescents focus awareness on In social contexts, self-regulation requires being their understanding and select strategies and environments aware of others (other people and their emotions, other that promote their learning.71 Indeed, researchers find that 66 Gestsdottir & Lerner (2008). 67 Flavell (1979); Hacker, Dunlosky, & Graesser (2009). 68 Philliber Research Associates (2013). 69 Gottfredson & Hirschi (1990); Moroney, Newman, Smith, Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? McGovern, & Yohalem (2014). 70 Farrington et al. (2012, p. 39). 71 Zimmerman (2002). 29 students of all ages who are more self-regulated display or understanding. Skills can be defined as having the more positive academic outcomes, including grade promo- learned ability to carry out a task with pre-determined tion, higher test scores, and better course grades. results or goals, which can be general or domain-spe- 72 Self-regulation is also related to many social and has—those that relate to oneself and to interacting with who had higher levels of self-control (defined by the others—are more transferable across contexts; once you researchers as a key aspect of self-regulation) exhib- have them, you are likely to adapt them to new settings. ited or indicated fewer problems with impulse control, Knowledge and skills that are related to a person’s inter- more secure (“good and stable”) relationships, better action with “the world” are often more specific to a given perspective-taking or empathy, and more construc- setting (e.g., having the skill to operate a fork lift). tive responses to anger. In other research, those with Academic content and skills are the most obvious higher levels of self-control reported being in more sat- set, as they are the primary focus of education in the isfying relationships, exhibited lower levels of juvenile United States. 77 Indeed, they also are one basis for delinquency and alcohol abuse, and were more success- higher-order competencies that are required for the ful supervisors in their jobs. types of jobs available in the 21st century (for example, 73 74 Most of the current evidence has established correla- 30 cific. Most of the knowledge and skills that someone behavioral outcomes. In one study, college students science knowledge or computer skills in STEM fields). tions and not causality between self-regulation skills However, there are a range of other types of knowl- and outcomes. In other words, it has been demonstrated edge and skills that are crucial for supporting success that self-regulation is related to these outcomes (e.g., in young adulthood, yet are generally not an explicit more self-regulation coincides with better outcomes), part of formal education. For example, as youth are but it is not known whether young people’s ability to preparing to enter into the variety of new and differ- self-regulate actually causes these better outcomes. ent settings that come with the entrance to adulthood, However, there is early evidence that interventions fo- having an understanding of various cultures, contexts, cusing on self-regulation with adolescents do lead to de- and institutions becomes critical. This includes gaining creases in violence and crime and increases in academic institutional knowledge—an understanding of how in- outcomes. stitutions such as universities, workplaces, or commu- 75 This emerging evidence has important implications for practice. Regardless of the direction nities function and what the norms are for participating of causality, if intentional practices that influence self- in those institutions. Specific institutional knowledge regulation also lead to changes in outcomes that matter may include knowledge of how to dress appropriately for youth success, this should be an area of focus for (e.g., a suit for a business job) or of the set of expecta- interventions and ongoing supports for youth. tions for behavior (e.g., not showing up late for a work meeting), which often vary across different institu- Knowledge and Skills tions. This type of knowledge and skills are essential to The role of knowledge and skills for success in young navigate across institutions and allow young adults to adulthood is commonly recognized. Different types of act with agency to successfully overcome obstacles and knowledge and skills play a central role in many of the accomplish goals within those institutions.78 influential frameworks of core competencies that have emerged in recent years. 76 Broadly speaking, knowledge All children learn the knowledge and skills needed to navigate their cultural environments. However, because is the possession of a certain set of facts, information, institutional knowledge and skills tend to mirror the 72 Agostin & Bane (1997); McClelland, Cameron, Connor, Farris, 76 Conley (2012); MHA Labs (2014); National Center for O*NET Jewkes, & Morrison (2007); Mischel, Shoda, & Peake (1988); Raver & Knitze (2002); Shoda, Mischel, & Peake (1990); Tangney, Baumeister, & Boone (2004). 73 Tangney, Baumeister, & Boon (2004). 74 Fitzsimons & Finkel (2011). 75 University of Chicago Crime Lab (2012). Development (2014); Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009); Pellegrino & Hilton (2012); Weissberg & Cascarino (2013). 77 For example, see the Common Core State Standards (National Governors’ Association and Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010). 78 Stanton-Salazar (2011). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework cultural norms of the dominant culture, this poses an the NRC committee provided an overview of the exist- additional set of skills and knowledge that low-income ing literature on the links between all of these types and minority youth need to learn in order to more easily of knowledge and skills and more successful outcomes navigate schools, workplaces, and other institutions. for young adults. As with self-regulation, they note that People from low-income and minority backgrounds are most of the evidence is correlational rather than causal. often expected to “code-switch” so that their behaviors Nonetheless, there is ample correlational evidence that match the norms of a given institution (e.g., a college academic achievement is related to a host of positive classroom), rather than their own cultural norms. outcomes. The NRC committee found that there are This requires having an additional set of knowledge modest associations between early achievement (relat- and skills, as well as other foundational components ed to knowledge) and later outcomes; interestingly, the such as self-regulation. strongest relationships exist when looking at youth who Interpersonal knowledge and skills represent have “persistent deficits” in their knowledge and skills. another important subset of this foundational compo- Those with achievement deficits have a much lower nent. Interpersonal knowledge is specific to knowing likelihood of graduating from high school and attending the norms for interacting with other people in a given college than those without achievement deficits. 80 setting or from a particular culture. Having the skills The NRC committee also found that greater levels to implement this well is evidenced by the ability to act of knowledge and skills are related to outcomes once according to those norms. For example, interpersonal out of school. Investments in education (which pri- knowledge may help a person to understand the appro- marily focus on the acquisition of content knowledge priate topics to raise with work colleagues versus close and skills) produce the largest returns through higher friends, and interpersonal skills allow a person to enact levels of income. The more years a person is in school, those rules in the applicable situations. Often, enacting the greater the benefits and satisfaction a person interpersonal skills according to social rules also relies receives through her job. It is important to note that on emotional or behavioral self-regulation—an example some research suggests that this relationship occurs of how the foundational components support each other because of better ongoing educational opportunities while also underlying the key factors for success and that are afforded to higher-scoring students, and is not later young adult outcomes. due to a direct link between knowledge and income. Nonetheless, greater acquisition of knowledge and skills Knowledge and skills and their relationship to young begets better opportunities for an individual over time, adult outcomes. A 2012 National Research Council regardless of socioeconomic status. 81 (NRC) report argued that there are three domains of knowledge, skills, and dispositions that are neces- Mindsets sary for success in education, work, and other areas of Mindsets are psycho-social beliefs and attitudes about adult responsibility: the cognitive domain (cognitive oneself, the external world, and the interaction between processes and strategies, creativity, and knowledge), the two. Mindsets are the brain’s way of efficiently the intrapersonal domain (intellectual openness, work organizing our interpretation of the world. They are ethic and conscientiousness, and positive core self- the default lenses we use to process everyday experi- evaluation), and the interpersonal domain (teamwork ence. Mindsets are malleable, but unless something and collaboration and leadership). challenges them—or challenges a conclusion we arrived 79 In their report, 79 Pellegrino & Hilton (2012). 80 Duncan & Magnuson (2011). 81 Currie & Thomas (1999). Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? 31 32 at because of them—we will continue to use these The research on self-efficacy consistently finds that interpretive lenses as a shortcut method of attribut- individuals are more likely to engage in tasks they feel ing motives, construing cause and effect, interpreting confident they can successfully complete and to with- how we fit in, anticipating likely consequences, and draw from tasks for which they lack such confidence. 85 approaching new experiences, among other things. The belief that one will succeed at a task is associated Mindsets are mutually reinforced by one’s knowledge with the level of effort one expends as well as one’s and awareness, as people use what they already think to likelihood to persist in the face of challenges. 86 Most make sense of new experience. As one recognizes and of the literature agrees that self-efficacy is domain interprets new experiences and information through specific and even task specific, meaning that the belief one’s default mindsets, this new, interpreted knowledge one can succeed is limited to specific cases (e.g., the in turn “justifies” the existing mindsets. In essence, belief that one can complete a particular set of difficult people see what they are looking for. Mindsets also in- math problems) rather than being broadly generalized, teract with self-regulation by coloring one’s awareness, even within a domain. It is unclear whether self-effi- which in turn guides one’s selection of strategies and cacy might spread over time or “spill over” to become a behaviors. It is crucial that in practice, adults attend more generalized expectation about one’s performance to the developing mindsets of youth. There is a danger in life. Another open question is how the development that if positive mindsets are not intentionally sup- or importance of self-efficacy might vary for different ported, negative or otherwise detrimental or maladap- subgroups in different contexts. These remain areas in tive mindsets may arise. Youth may then be susceptible need of further research. 87 to ongoing, reinforcing negative interpretations of Openness is a broad set of attitudes that encompass themselves and the world, ultimately interfering with an individual’s receptiveness to new and unfamiliar their achievement of positive outcomes. For illustrative ideas, feelings, and experiences as well as interest in purposes only, we briefly examine three mindsets—self- new people and places. 88 Though openness is counted efficacy, openness, and a growth mindset—to demon- as one of the “Big Five” personality traits, which are strate how mindsets operate across contexts to support viewed as relatively fixed characteristics of a person, young adult success. there is a general understanding that openness can 82 Self-efficacy is the belief that one is able to succeed at a given task. 83 As Bandura wrote, “Among the mecha- be developed through exposure to new experiences, particularly in the context of a secure base from which nisms of agency, none is more central or pervasive than to venture forth. Individual openness increases over people’s beliefs about their capabilities to exercise control childhood through young adulthood 89 and is associ- over their own level of functioning and over events that ated with a general flexibility in thinking. 90 Openness affect their lives. Efficacy beliefs influence how people is more than a passive psychological trait, but rather feel, think, motivate themselves, and behave.” 84 Self- also includes the motivation and actions to seek out new efficacy seems to play a particularly important role in experiences and the ability to adapt to new experiences, supporting the key factor of agency in young adulthood. whether or not they have been sought out. 91 82 This list of mindsets differs slightly from the four academic 83 Bandura (1986). 84 Bandura (1993, p. 118). 85 Bandura (1986). 86 Bandura & Schunk (1981); Bouffard-Bouchard (1990); mindsets we reviewed in our earlier report, Teaching Adolescents to Become Learners (Farrington et al., 2012). From that earlier list, we could just as easily have included relevance and belonging here, as these mindsets could also provide strong supports for success in young adulthood. Because we have broadened our focus in this report to outcomes beyond academic performance and are considering multiple contexts beyond the classroom (e.g., family, community, out-of-school programs), we add here the mindset of openness, which has evidence of playing a particularly important role in supporting young adult success. Pajares (1996); Schunk & Mullen (2012). 87 Lennon (2010); Schunk & Meece (2006). 88 Dignan (1990); McCrae & Sutin (2009). 89 McCrae et al. (2002). 90 McCrae & Sutin (2009). 91 McCrae & Costa (1997). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework A growth mindset is the belief that ability and skill Mindsets and Their Relationship to Young are malleable and will increase in response to one’s ef- Adult Outcomes fort rather than being fixed and outside of one’s control. All three mindsets illustrated here (as well as those Similar to self-efficacy beliefs, having a growth mindset reviewed in our 2012 report) have been linked to higher is advantageous because it affects how one interprets levels of achievement and other outcomes for young and responds to struggle and failure and makes a per- adult success. High self-efficacy has been linked to son more likely to persevere in the face of challenge. greater commitment to goals, use of more effective 92 People with growth mindsets are more self-motivating strategies, and a better response to negative feedback. 95 and persistent than people with fixed mindsets, and As summarized by Lennon (2010), students with high ac- they expend effort to build their competence rather ademic self-efficacy set academic goals, commit to those than withdrawing from difficult tasks. goals, and view problems as challenges to be mastered. 93 When they experience failure or receive critical feed- Mindsets are inextricably related to the other foundational pieces of the framework—self-regulation, back, they redouble their efforts to improve their per- knowledge and skills, and values. The extent to which formance rather than interpreting failure as diagnostic individuals are aware of themselves and others and able of their capabilities. Because strong self-efficacy beliefs to harness that awareness to propel themselves forward affect how one construes and responds to setbacks, self- may be closely associated with their beliefs and atti- efficacy increases one’s likelihood for success, regard- tudes. Likewise, we expect mindsets to be recursively less of actual ability level; 96 thus, self-efficacy is an influenced by other aspects of the framework. important ingredient for young adult success. 94 For example, being able to engage in effective behaviors or Due to its diffuse and multi-faceted nature, research- to self-regulate may affect one’s sense of self-efficacy, ers have historically had more difficulty isolating the openness, and belief in one’s ability to grow. Further, beneficial effects of openness. 97 Despite these limita- maintaining a sense of purpose and a belief that “I mat- tions, openness has been associated with a number of ter” is only possible if the world one apprehends feels important outcomes, including healthy relationships, 98 within one’s control and responsive to one’s actions. academic test scores, 99 and job performance.100 The Mindsets such as openness, growth, and self-efficacy role of openness (or its mechanism of association) in are likely to support young people in cultivating a larger other psychological or social outcomes has yet to be thor- sense of purpose and taking action to achieve that oughly explored. It is possible, for example, that open- purpose. Given the roles mindsets play in perseverance, ness might allow individuals to be more flexible in coping they are also intricately related to agency. Adaptive with difficult situations, or that being open to and seek- mindsets can provide the positive beliefs a person needs ing new experiences might allow an individual to take to go after her ambitions and push through obstacles better advantage of resources and opportunities. As will that may stand in her way. be shown in Chapter 3, openness to a range of new adult roles (rather than prematurely narrowing one’s options) seems to have long-term benefits for young adults. 92 Dweck (1975). 93 Cury, Elliott, Da Fonseca, & Moller (2006); Dweck & Leggett (1988). 94 Farrington et al. (2012). 95 Locke & Latham (2002). Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? 96 Farrington et al. (2012). 97 McCrae et al. (2002). 98 McCrae (1996); Ozer & Bennet-Martinez (2006). 99 Noftle & Robbins (2007). 100 Barrick & Mount (1991); Tett, Jackson, & Rothstein (1991). 33 Growth mindsets have been found to be influential for success in school as well as across a variety of other Values include both the moral code of conduct one uses contexts. in daily activities (e.g., being kind, being truthful) and 101 Interventions designed to build growth mindsets have tended either to use explicit instruction long-term “outcomes” of importance (e.g., getting an on neuroplasticity—teaching students that the brain is education, having the respect of friends, contributing to “like a muscle” that gets stronger with use—or to focus the community) that may not necessarily have a right or on giving process-oriented feedback that emphasizes wrong valence.105 Having a sense of one’s values is one student effort or strategy use rather than innate of the core components of identity formation and can be ability, e.g., “You did very well; you must have worked used to guide the commitments young adults make to hard on that” rather than “You did very well; you must roles, beliefs, and relationships as they try to find a place be really smart at this.” Interestingly, even brief, tar- in the larger society.106 Values motivate how one engages geted comments such as these can be enough to “switch with the world, whether it is with a specific behavior or off” a more fixed mindset and “switch on” a more something broader such as an occupation or role. growth-oriented mindset, at least temporarily—and 34 for living and provide an orientation for the future.104 As youth develop, the internalization of experiences experimental studies show that students who receive and relationships shapes their values, consciously and “growth-mindset feedback” tend to perform better than unconsciously. The development of agency and identity control subjects on subsequent experimental tasks.102 is shaped by whether youth have a clear sense of their The belief that hard work pays off seems to have obvious values, whatever those values are. Being able to ar- benefits across a variety of domains, beginning most ticulate those and focus on aligning their efforts with notably in early adolescence when young people begin those values helps youth and young adults to go after to differentiate between ability and effort and begin a set of cohesive goals that align with the person they forming a stronger sense of their own competencies. 103 want to be. Having a sense of values also helps a person Although most of the literature focuses on relation- distinguish between something that is morally right or ships between mindsets and academic outcomes, the wrong, or between something that would have a positive extrapolation to other sectors of a person’s life is not or a negative effect on one’s community. As young chil- difficult. Believing that new opportunities are worth dren mature, there is a realization that morality is not pursuing, that one has the capabilities to be successful black and white, and one’s values tend to provide some at something, and that more effort will result in growth shading for those morals. are likely to serve a young adult well. Such an adaptive belief can be directed toward one’s home life, work life, Values and Their Relationship to Young college life, or other interests. Adult Outcomes Values, such as caring about whether something has Values social value, shape how young adults engage in roles. One of the major influences on how young adults ap- For example, observational studies of individuals in proach their life path and interact with others and the low-status occupations found that motivation and world is based on their values, the fourth foundational performance are strongly connected to the perception component of our framework. Values are lasting beliefs, of that work as having larger social value.107 Individuals often culturally defined, about what is good or bad and in a wide range of occupations and professional settings, what is important in life, which serve as broad guidelines including hospital orderlies, prison guards, telemarket- 101 Dweck (2006). 102 Dweck (2002); Mueller & Dweck (1998). 103 Eccles et al. (1993); Farrington et al. (2012). 104 Braithwaite & Law (1985); Weber (1993). 105 Rokeach (1971) distinguishes between terminal values, which during his or her lifetime, and instrumental values, which are the behaviors and code of conduct that can get one there. 106 Hazen, Scholzman, & Beresin (2008). 107 Yeager et al. (2014); see also Ashforth & Kreiner (1999); Dutton, Roberts, & Bednar (2010); Hughes (1958, 1962); Wrzesniewski, Dutton, & Debebe (2003); Olivola & Shafir (2013). are the end-state goals an individual would like to achieve UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework ers,108 and medical professionals,109 all demonstrate Additionally, it is important to note that although greater commitment to performing their jobs at a high the foundational components are depicted here as level when that work is explicitly linked to serving a four separate components, they are intricately inter- larger social purpose, such as helping the poor or elimi- related and mutually reinforcing (much like agency, nating disease and improving others’ health.110 One’s integrated identity, and competencies). By the time values and commitments also “provide resources for an individual reaches adolescence, these components emerging adults to counteract the anomie and lack of col- have developed alongside one another and influenced lective support associated with identity formation and the the development of each other. Having strength in any transition to adulthood in the United States.” 111 one component is likely to strengthen the other com- Implications ponents, and deficits in one component can hinder the development of other components. Ultimately, strong The foundational components include having the self- connections among these four foundational compo- regulation to plan, manage, and follow through on a nents make possible a wide range of competencies given set of actions; knowledge and skills to navigate and processes, including critical thinking, problem- various situations; positive mindsets about the oppor- solving, collaborating, responsible decision-making, tunities available and the ability to capitalize on those network-building, constructing an integrated identity opportunities; and a strong sense of values. Together, that brings together one’s past and future, and hav- these make an individual more likely to attain her goals. ing the agency to navigate fearlessly through different However, these foundational components do not directly social worlds. In turn, it is experiences and relation- lead to young adult success. It is through the develop- ships within a person’s social worlds that reciprocally ment of the foundational components that young adults develop these foundational components. It is these are able to effectively act with agency, build an integrat- very developmental experiences and developmental ed identity, and have strong competencies. relationships that we address next. 108 Grant (2008). 109 Grant & Hoffman (2011). 110 Feiler, Tost, & Grant (2012); Grant & Rothbard (forthcoming); Sansone, Weir, Harpster, & Morgan (1992). 111 Schwartz, Côté, & Arnett (2005, p. 223). Chapter 1 | What are the Ingredients of “Success”? 35 36 CHAPTER 2 The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships Key Points • Developmental experiences are opportunities for action and reflection that help young people build self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values, and develop agency, integrated identity, and competencies. • Strong, supported, and sustained relationships with caring adults provide an important space for youth to experiment, try out roles and behaviors, and receive feedback that helps to shape how they ultimately construct an integrated identity. • Developmental experiences are “maximized” in the context of social interactions with others. • Educators, parents, childcare providers, and youth workers need opportunities and support to develop the knowledge and skills to create meaningful experiences for youth. • Experience must be assigned meaning and be integrated into one’s emerging sense of identity if it is to have lasting or transferrable benefit. Mediating young people’s thinking about their experience is one important way that adults aid in learning and development. • When young people have the opportunity to make contributions that are valued by others, they gain self-confidence and come to see themselves as capable and able to effect change in their own lives and in the larger world. • Children’s opportunities for development vary significantly by race and socioeconomic class. Providing more equitable opportunities is critical to achieving a just society and realizing the potential of young people in the United States. In the introduction and Chapter 1, we presented a set of adults might help youth develop a set of navigational key factors (agency, integrated identity, and competen- tools for exploring the world, an adaptive orientation cies) and the foundational components that underlie toward life, and the habitual positive behaviors as- them (self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, sociated with “good character.” We begin with a focus and values) that would be emblematic of a young person on what we are terming developmental experiences, who is able to succeed in the educational, economic, drawing from key principles of how youth learn, and social, and civic tasks of young adulthood. We touched then turn to the importance of developmental relation- briefly upon the way these foundational components ships as essential social contexts for these experiences. and key factors are mutually reinforcing, helping Development is a natural, ongoing process as young young people to both learn from and proactively shape people observe the world, interact with others, and their worlds. We turn now to the question of how these make meaning of their experiences. Regardless of the foundational components and key factors can be inten- degree of adult guidance, children will still “develop” tionally developed. How do children learn knowledge, in some way, learning how to do things and coming to skills, values, mindsets, and the complex processes of conclusions about themselves, what they value, their self-regulation? How do they develop agency, an inte- prospects, and their paths forward. They will develop grated identity, and competencies essential to success some skills and preferences, and they will likely figure in the 21st century? In this chapter, we focus on what out much they need to know. And yet, the developmen- is known about the transformation of children’s daily tal benefit of children’s experiences can be enhanced experience into learning and becoming. We explore how and directed by others to help youth best formulate and Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 37 internalize the developmental “lessons” from these ex- developmental relationships, but it should be empha- periences. sized that, in practice, development flourishes in the 112 Participating on a Little League team can simply be the experience of having fun playing baseball context of social relationships and community. (perhaps an important goal in itself), but it can also be a rich opportunity for children to build social skills for How Humans Learn and Develop interacting with adults and peers, learn to regulate be- Our understanding of human learning has significantly havior in line with shared rules, visit other communities improved over the past several decades, fueled in part and gain cultural awareness, develop athletic competen- by technological advances that enable much more cies and habits of physical fitness, learn strategies for intricate observations of the human brain at work. dealing with setbacks, or figure out how to do batting Learning is no longer understood as amassing facts in practice even when friends want to play video games. card-catalog fashion, or as trained behavioral responses Young people’s daily lives are a continual stream of 38 to stimuli, but rather as changes in the complex neural experiences and social interactions; intentional adult interconnections in the brain; these neural connections practices can alter the nature and substance of these are then “felt” as changes in our sense of understand- experiences and interactions to guide them toward ing, or in our subjective experience of ourselves in the important developmental goals. As young people grow, world. We focus here on broad lines of work that depict adults should give them increasing responsibility for learning as experiential and social, as well as work that making choices about and ascribing meaning to the examines the underlying neurological components experiences and relationships they pursue. of learning. Though there are still many unanswered Developmental Experiences We define developmental experiences as those activities that provide children and youth with the necessary questions in the human cognitive sciences, existing research suggests compelling courses of action for adults working with and on behalf of children and youth. Drawing from research on how children learn conditions and stimuli to advance their development and how habits are developed,113 we offer a model as appropriate to their age. Developmental experi- for developmental experiences as including both ences provide rich opportunities for youth to build the active (“building”) and reflective (“meaning-making”) foundational components of self-regulation, knowledge aspects. As depicted in the Foundations for Young Adult and skills, mindsets, and values; to practice competen- Success developmental framework (see Figure 1), these cies; and to foster the capabilities to have agency and an experiences help strengthen the foundational com- integrated identity in young adulthood. As will be clear ponents and key factors as youth grow up. The active throughout this chapter, developmental experiences are aspects provide opportunities for children and youth to “maximized” in the context of social interactions with become more sophisticated in their self-regulation and others—in strong, supported, and sustained relation- to build knowledge and skills, mindsets, values, and to ships with adults and peers that are set within caring foster agency, an integrated identity and competencies. communities. For developmental experiences to have a Building the foundational components and key fac- lasting and transferrable impact, the insights, develop- tors for success in young adulthood depends on active ing skills, or other lessons generated by these experi- opportunities to encounter, tinker, practice, choose, and ences must be integrated into one’s larger sense of self contribute. Youth cannot build their capacities or de- in a way that expands a young person’s competencies velop expertise without these opportunities. However, and agency in the world. We describe developmental though these active aspects of developmental experi- experiences in full before moving to a discussion of ences are necessary, they are not sufficient for learning. 112 Vygotsky (1978). 113 Bransford, Brown, & Cocking (2000); Ericsson & Charness (1994); Lally, Van Jaarsveld, Potts, & Wardle (2010). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Young people also require opportunities to make mean- ors that are personally and socially meaningful. ing of their active participation and of the competencies Below, we examine each of these experiences further. they are building. The reflective aspects of developmental experiences provide opportunities to describe Encountering. For children to develop awareness one’s growing understanding of the world and evaluate of themselves, others, and the world, they need access various aspects of one’s performance or one’s choices; to to new people, new ideas, new roles, and new places. connect experiences to other things youth know, experi- To develop self-regulation, skills, and competencies, ence, and care about; and to envision possibilities for they need clear models of behavior, of skilled perfor- the future. Over time, a key part of reflective activities mance, and of high-quality products. Many of the is to integrate developmental experiences into one’s practitioners we interviewed for this project empha- self-concept and the “story” of oneself; this is the path sized the importance of exposing children to novel to building agency and an integrated identity. Below, things and situations. Crystal Elliott-O’Connor, we describe in more detail the dual aspects of develop- associate director of early childhood development mental experiences—acting and reflecting. In Chapter at Family Focus, emphasized that the educators she 3, we consider how knowledge of child and adolescent worked with were “really making sure that children development can be used to best tailor developmental have very, very rich and very many experiences…to just experiences for young people at various developmental play in novel ways, with materials and supplies and stages, from early childhood through young adulthood. equipment that maybe they would not normally get or see outside of the classroom.” 117 Another interviewee, The Action Reflection Cycle Blair Root, the director of a neighborhood club that The Active Aspects of Developmental Experiences serves school-aged children, noted that it is important A long tradition of work in philosophy, psychology, and to offer “different hands-on learning activities…to education emphasizes the critical role of experience in introduce [children] to activities they may not have learning. Educational theorist David Kolb defined had the opportunity to [try], whether just playing foot- learning as “the process whereby knowledge is created ball, doing some science with them, or art, or a fencing through the transformation of experience.” program.” 118 For older youth to develop a sense of who 114 115 This kind of direct experience—“the concrete, tangible, felt qualities of the world, relying on our senses, and immersing ourselves in concrete reality”—is one of the primary ways children perceive new information and develop an FIGURE 4 Building Foundations for Young Adult Success Through Developmental Experiences understanding of the world.116 But certain types of experiences provide richer opportunities for development than others (see Figure 4). Generally speaking, children need active opportunities to observe models, to tinker, CONTRIBUTE PRACTICE CHOOSE ences include those that put children in interaction with peers and adults; build strong and supportive relationships; and provide opportunities to play and explore, EVALUATE ACTION to practice, to make choices, and ultimately to contribute work of value to others. Rich developmental experi- DESCRIBE CONNECT REFLECTION TINKER ENCOUNTER try on new roles and perspectives, publicly demonstrate ENVISION INTEGRATE new skills and competencies, and contribute to endeav- 114 Dewey (1938); James (1912); Freire (1970/ 1993); Kolb 117 UChicago CCSR Interview with Crystal Elliott-O’Connor, (1984); Mezirow (1985, 2000). 115 Kolb (1984, p. 41). 116 Kolb (1984). 118 UChicago CCSR interview with Blair Root, director, Associate Director, Family Focus (September 24, 2014). Hyde Park Neighborhood Club (October 29, 2014). Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 39 they want to be and the kind of work they want to do models of what they are working toward (i.e., what it when they enter adulthood, they need opportunities “to would look, feel, sound, or taste like if it were done learn about (and more selectively, to experience) the range well), young people have a difficult time directing their of adult roles—the kinds of technical, scientific, artistic, efforts. Seeing both the final product and the process social, and civic tasks that adults devote themselves to, for creating it aids in developing competencies and and the range of roles in particular vocational arenas.” 119 Encountering also means watching others and exam- potential identities. Not only can adults act as role models who demonstrate appropriate behaviors for ining models or exemplars. Many young people engage specific situations, but they can also provide youth in “reflective observation” as their primary means for with clear examples of quality work.124 Ron Berger, taking in information about the world.120 They care- chief academic officer for the Expeditionary Learning fully watch adults or other youth and incorporate their (EL) network of schools, is a particularly strong behaviors, their speech patterns, and their preferences. advocate of the importance of high-quality models. Young people also look to others to learn new skills He wrote, and influence their values. Healthy relationships with 40 adults are critical for youth development, as it is from Models are important in all ways for youth: adults that young people learn “how one listens, thinks, models of the kinds of work they need to relates to other people, responds, formulates questions, do, but equally models of how to act in handles conflict, provides feedback, and reconciles differ- different situations, models of what they ences in perspective.” could become, models of communities 121 Vygotsky pointed to the role of “more capable peers” and adult guides in demonstrating they can aspire to join or create. Adults are how to do things children cannot figure out or execute often telling adolescents what is possible, alone. what they can become, but unless those 122 Role models can demonstrate behaviors and language appropriate to a given situation or setting—for kids see models of what [that] actually looks example, how to engage with adults in a professional like—other young adults or adults who are workplace, how to advocate for oneself at a doctor’s successful examples—it’s hard to have a office, or how to chop logs into firewood. As Halpern, vision of what they are aiming for or believe Heckman, and Larson write in their report on adoles- it is possible. When new students enter cent learning, young people learn best when they are successful EL schools, I think the power of immersed in a “community of practice” that “allows its models is what transforms them. Everywhere newest members to watch, listen to, and emulate…more they look, there is student work on the experienced members. It provides models of action. It walls that is a model of the quality of what gives less experienced learners opportunity to see all the is expected, there are older students who steps in addressing a problem before they are ready to are taking their academic success seriously, accomplish these steps independently.” treating others well and showing academic 123 Encountering models is essential in situations where courage, there are adults who are modeling youth are expected to deliver some kind of performance respectful communication and integrity. or create a final product, whether writing a research —Ron Berger, chief academic officer, paper, playing a sonata, preparing a lasagna dinner, Expeditionary Learning125 or changing the tire on the family car. Without clear 119 120 121 122 Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013). Kolb (1984). Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013, p. 15). Vygotsky (1978). 123 Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013, p. 10). 124 Berger (2003). 125 Ron Berger, chief academic officer, Expeditionary Learning, email communication with the authors (February 2015). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Encountering new ideas, new places, and models of experimentation as essential for healthy development. what is possible is one of the most important develop- Both of these approaches emphasize the creation mental experiences young people can have. of richly stimulating environments as settings for children’s exploration and imaginative play, and Tinkering. Providing opportunities for children and indeed, this is accepted practice in early childhood youth to actively discover, design, puzzle, build, experi- environments around the country. ment, create, play, imagine, test, and generally jump in Unfortunately, much of the emphasis on play and and do is essential to their developing knowledge about exploration seems to disappear as soon as children the physical world and how things work. Participating enter formal schooling. As Expeditionary Learning’s in activities together also gives young people opportu- Ron Berger noted about traditional school transitions, nities to negotiate ideas with others, take on different preschoolers and kindergartners get “play areas and perspectives, and practice self-regulatory skills (e.g., block areas and toys and drama centers and dress up focusing attention, inhibiting impulses, taking turns). centers. And then the kids go into first grade, and Physical engagement also helps children test (and learn) they’re just a few months older, where there are just their limits and challenges them to stretch past the desks in rows, and no way to be active and creative.” 128 edge of their comfort and existing abilities to expand There is little opportunity to tinker in formal K-12 their capabilities. settings. This is a mistake, because opportunities to Many practitioners emphasized the importance of be creative are indispensable to children’s learning. providing children with rich exploratory opportunities, In a 21st century economy that prizes creativity and particularly when we were talking with out-of-school innovation, youth need repeated opportunities to providers or educators working with young children. engage in challenging, open-ended tasks that require Vanessa Schwartz, a program supervisor, explained them to think “outside of the box” and grapple with that a goal of the home-visiting and other early difficult problems. They also need opportunities for childhood programs that she oversees is to “let the imaginative play. UC Berkeley psychology professor child direct the play, and not have the adult try to direct Alison Gopnik notes: how a child does things…to help develop that child’s creativity and problem-solving skills, instead of being Conventional wisdom suggests that knowl- told” how things should be done. edge and imagination, science and fantasy, 126 Melinda Berry, senior family support specialist with Educare Chicago, are deeply different from one another—even echoed this perspective even for the very youngest of opposites. But…the same abilities that let children, noting the importance of balancing safety for children learn so much about the world also infants and toddlers with “enough freedom to explore allow them to change the world—to bring and learn on their own.” 127 Providing extended and new worlds into existence—and to imagine uninterrupted periods of time for children to explore alternative worlds that may never exist at all. their environments has been a central tenet of the Children’s brains create causal theories of the Montessori approach to education for over a hundred world, maps of how the world works. And years. Likewise, the now-widespread philosophy these theories allow children to envisage new of early childhood education developed in Reggio possibilities, and to imagine and pretend that Emilia, Italy, also sees children’s exploration and the world is different.129 126 UChicago CCSR interview with Vanessa Schwartz, program 128 UChicago CCSR interview with Ron Berger, Chief Academic supervisor, Metropolitan Family Services (October 3, 2014). 127 UChicago CCSR interview with Melinda Berry, senior family support specialist, Educare Chicago (September 18, 2014). 129 Gopnik (2009, p. 21). Officer, Expeditionary Learning (September 19, 2014). Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 41 Gopnik and her colleagues believe that imaginative 42 repetitively does not lead to improvement.134 In fact, play helps prepare children for serious adult activities, repeated practice can reinforce bad habits or incorrect such as setting goals, anticipating challenges, and approaches if one doesn’t have a way to recognize what planning for contingencies. They argue that “counter- one is doing wrong. Instead, “deliberate practice” empha- factual reasoning,” the ability to imagine an alternative sizes the importance of motivation, adequate strategies, representation of reality, “is a crucial tool that children and accurate feedback, as well as repeated and focused need to plan for the future and learn about the world.” effort over time to push oneself and develop expertise.135 This is a basic component of “design thinking,” an ap- Comparing one’s performance against an explicit out- proach to creating solutions that is increasingly valued come or a mental model 136 is an essential component of in business, engineering, architecture, urban planning, effective practice. Knowledgeable teachers, coaches, or and education. As design science theorist John Chris tutors who observe young people’s practice and provide Jones wrote, designers “are forever bound to treat as real immediate feedback ensure that errors are caught early that which exists only in an imagined future and have to and corrected before they become engrained. Repeated specify ways in which the foreseen thing can be made to physical or mental actions established through practice exist.” can strengthen neural pathways across the parts of the 130 While school may provide fewer opportuni- ties for tinkering and creative play as children get older, brain that are engaged in the repeated activity. Advances young people continue to need exploratory experiences in neuroscience support the benefits of motivated, to lay the tracks for handling adult responsibilities deliberate practice—and point to the inextricable con- 131 and developing competencies for the 21st century. For older adolescents, tinkering often takes the form nections between emotion and learning. Neuroscientists “now know that in order for practice to induce learning-de- of a more grown-up version of early childhood role play. pendent brain changes it must be meaningful, motivating, Teenagers try on different personas as a way of test- skillful, challenging, and rewarding.” 137 driving potential adult roles. Older adolescents who are Practice not only builds expertise over time, but also presented with and encouraged to explore a wide vari- reinforces motivation for continued learning. Intrinsic ety of opportunities, roles, and life possibilities before motivation develops as youth “learn more about a topic, prematurely deciding on one course have more agency experience competence in it, and connect with others who and are better able to achieve an integrated identity in share this interest” and gain practice applying “the tools young adulthood. of a discipline in creative and generative ways…[and] 132 Continuing to provide opportuni- ties to play, explore, and tinker for children and youth make them their own.” 138 As young people practice their of all ages, across all contexts, strongly supports the skills in a community that values expertise in a given development of the foundational components and the area, they become better able to manage the tedious key factors of young adult success. parts of practice and to sustain their interest in improving their craft.139 For example, in the popular “School Practicing. While children learn by encountering and of Rock” music schools that have sprung up around the tinkering, they also need opportunities to practice in country, children and youth engage in a performance- order to build competencies over time. There is strong based approach to learning music that has them almost empirical support for practice as a major factor in immediately practicing in a band with their peers. developing expertise. Youth who are experienced musicians play together 133 However, just doing something 130 Jones (1992). 131 Weisberg & Gopnik (2013, p. 1368). 132 Berzonsky (1989); Kroger (1993); Marcia (1966); SavitzRomer & Bouffard (2012); Schwartz, Côté, & Arnett (2005). 133 Ericsson & Charness (1994). 134 Kolb & Kolb (2009). 135 136 137 138 139 Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer (1993). Keeton, Sheckley, & Griggs (2002). Winstein (2014). Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013, p. 12). Hidi & Renninger (2006). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework with newcomers as they prepare for a live performance build toward agency in young adulthood. This means be- in an established music venue. Ultimately, whether ing increasingly able to choose their activities, their com- in music, sports, academics, or any number of other panions, how they spend their time, the ways they present endeavors, practice prepares children and youth to be themselves, and decisions that will affect their future. successful in future performances. Opportunities for The importance of choosing is reflected in the inclu- practice take on particular importance in the teenage sion of “responsible decision making” in CASEL’s model years. “If development is ‘rehearsals’ for becoming an of social-emotional learning core competencies. CASEL adult,” says developmental psychologist Abigail Baird, defines responsible decision-making as “the ability to “then adolescence is the final ‘dress rehearsal’ before you make constructive and respectful choices about personal have to take the stage, and you need as much experience— behavior and social interactions based on consideration with both success and failure—as possible.” of ethical standards, safety concerns, social norms, the 140 realistic evaluation of consequences of various actions, Choosing. As children learn and grow, an important and the well-being of self and others.” 144 Taken together, developmental experience involves the opportunity to there is a wide range of evidence that providing oppor- make choices for themselves. Psychologists have long tunities for children and youth to make increasingly noted that human beings need to feel in control of their meaningful choices is critical to the development of own destiny; many see autonomy as a basic psychologi- self-regulation, values, and agency.145 43 cal need.141 But how do young people achieve autonomy in a world that necessarily imposes all kinds of restric- Contributing. Ultimately, developmental experiences en- tions on their actions? One psychological theory, called able young people to contribute—to solve problems self-determination theory, defines “autonomous acts” or bring into the world works of value to the self and as those that are consciously chosen by a coherent self. others. Contributing is not only important because This does not imply that autonomous choices are not of its altruistic aspects and its value to a community. constrained by outside circumstance, but rather that Contributing is also important developmentally. When the human actor recognizes those constraints or influ- young people have the opportunity to make meaning- ences and makes a conscious choice within them. ful contributions that are valued by others, they gain 142 At every age, making choices fosters cognitive, moral, self-confidence and come to see themselves as capable.146 and social development.143 For very young children, Contributing to others gives our lives meaning. In a choices are likely to be highly structured and posed by study of meaningfulness and happiness, researchers adults—“Would you rather play outside on the swings or found that “meaningfulness is associated with doing things stay inside and read books this morning?”—while older for others,” and that people who rated themselves as “giv- youth often have to figure out for themselves what their ers” rather than “takers” had more meaningful lives.147 options are in a given situation before choosing what Further, creating and contributing give young people the to do. For adolescents, choosing may involve complex opportunity to practice agency. Contributing requires decision-making about how to act with integrity amidst one to act with purpose, or to borrow John Dewey’s competing social pressures or how to act morally by words, to translate an “original impulse and desire…into weighing conflicting values. Young people need to experi- a plan and method of action” to achieve one’s desired end, ence increasing autonomy over their lives in order to based on “observation, information, and judgment.” 148 140 Abigail Baird, email communication with the authors, 145 Deci & Ryan (1985); Ryan & Deci (2000); National Research 141 142 143 144 February 2015. Deci & Ryan (1985); Ryan & Deci (2000). Ryan & Deci (2006). Erikson (1950/1963). CASEL website (2015): http://www.casel.org/social-andemotional-learning/core-competencies/. Council and Institute of Medicine (2004); Stefanou, Perencevich, DiCintio, & Turner (2004). 146 Hattie & Yates (2014). 147 Baumeister, Vohs, Aaker, & Garbinsky (2013, p. 512). 148 Dewey (1938, 1963, p. 69). Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships Contributing also makes clear that young people are not merely passive recipients of experience, nor are they an ongoing process of interpretation and meaning-mak- powerless in the face of external forces that affect their ing, learning from a complex array of ideas, experiences, lives. Schools and youth programs across the country and interactions with others, and incorporating new are providing opportunities for young people to make information into their existing understanding of the genuine contributions that change material conditions world. It is through experience that youth develop the in the world, for themselves and others. For example, foundational components for success and a set of com- youth leaders on Mikva Challenge’s Juvenile Justice petencies. But if experience is to have lasting benefit, it Council in Chicago saw the devastating effects that past must be assigned meaning and be integrated into one’s arrest records had on young people’s opportunities, emerging sense of identity. Psychologists as far back as particularly in communities of color. They learned that William James in 1890 have noted that we can enhance fewer than one-tenth of 1 percent of juvenile offenders learning by focusing our attention and reflecting on our got their records expunged when they became adults.149 experience. Research has consistently shown that learn- The Mikva youth leaders created an app—Expunge.io— ing is accelerated and more readily transferred to other that links youth who have juvenile records to pro bono situations when people reflect on what happened, what lawyers who help them through the legal process to worked, and what needs improving.153 get their records erased at age 18. In another example, 44 through their daily lives, children and youth engage in Critical to this process are strong, supportive, and sixth-graders at Genesee Community Charter School sustained relationships with caring adults who can in Rochester, New York, engaged in a year of research encourage young people to reflect on their experiences about the economic impacts that revitalized waterways and help them to interpret those experiences in ways had in four U.S. cities. They then successfully lobbied for that expand their sense of themselves and their hori- a bond measure to restore the dry Erie Canal waterway zons. In this way, making sense of experience is an “un- that runs through downtown Rochester, based on their relentingly social” process.154 Mediating young people’s policy argument that the revitalized waterway would thinking about their experience is one of the important support restoration of a vibrant commercial district.150 ways that adults aid in learning and development.155 In yet another example, youth from Kids First! Oakland Researchers have found that even young children are organized a multi-year campaign to win free or reduced- able to engage in metacognitive reflection and stra- fare transit vouchers for low-income students so they tegic thinking,156 and benefit from adults and others could get to and from school. who can help them reflect on their experience. In our 151 The contributions of young people not only improve the lives of others, but conception of developmental experiences, we identify also build critical competencies and develop agency for five particular types of reflection and meaning-making the young people themselves. Providing opportunities that support youth development: describing, evaluating, for these experiences is essential for youth development connecting, envisioning, and integrating. and learning. Describing and Evaluating. Providing opportunities The Reflective Aspect of Developmental for young people to talk about and assess their lives, Experiences: Making Meaning feelings, thoughts, and experiences is crucial to their John Dewey said, “We do not learn from experience. We overall development. Talking about an event or activ- learn from reflecting on experience.” ity helps children to “own” the experience and define 149 150 151 152 153 152 As they move Mikva Challenge (2014). Expeditionary Learning (2014). Kids First Oakland (2008). Dewey (1938, p. 78). Palincsar & Brown (1984); Scardamalia, Bereiter, & Steinbach (1984); Schoenfeld (1983, 1985, 1991). 154 Weick (1995, p. 79). 155 Bransford, Brown, & Cocking (2000); Vygotsky (1978). 156 Branford, Brown, & Cocking (2000); Brown & DeLoache (1978); DeLoache et al. (1998). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework it for themselves. By putting words to experience, they their early experiences that life is erratic and outside can examine, categorize, evaluate, and decide what the of their control, they can develop a mindset of “learned experience means to them. helplessness” 161 and refrain from exerting effort to From the moment babies are born, adults facilitate improve their situation. If children conclude from language development by putting words to children’s their experiences that they are not smart enough to do experience. We put names to things in the outside world well in school (what Carol Dweck and colleagues have (puppy, dump truck, pine tree) and to internal sensa- called a “fixed mindset”), they will seek to avoid risk and tions and emotions (hungry, frustrated, silly). Adults’ withdraw effort, thus creating a self-fulfilling prophecy ongoing narration of the world has clear neurological of poor performance.162 Helping children and adoles- and educational consequences for children. Differences cents to reframe such experiences is critical for their in the variety and complexity of early caregivers’ long-term achievement in school, as mindsets tend to speech predict young children’s future language become self-reinforcing,163 thus shaping young people’s development, interpretations of their subsequent experiences. 157 which in turn predicts self-regulatory ability and later academic achievement. 158 The richer Older youth have a particular need to talk about the language children have to describe their experience, their ideas and feelings as they encounter more diverse the more control they are able to exercise over them- points of view and develop abilities for more complex selves and the better able they are to articulate their thought. Adolescents can begin to decipher better and needs and aspirations. Ultimately, “we all make sense of worse options and to evaluate their own behaviors or the world with the discourses we have access to,” performance. Dialogue not only fosters close social 159 and this starts with infants’ very first exposure to language. As children get older, they play a more active role relationships and helps youth figure out their values and perspectives, it also creates the conditions for mak- in narrating their experience. A practitioner in the ing change and exercising agency. This is at the heart Afterschool All-Stars program, William “BJ” Lohr, of Paulo Freire’s pedagogical philosophy. He pushed made this point when talking about the kids he works against the idea of simply narrating the world for young with. Beyond creating a physically and emotionally people (as happens in the traditional model of educa- safe environment that invites children to participate, tion), insisting instead that people “achieve significance the next step is “finding ways for [youth] to share their as human beings” by “naming the world [for themselves].... voice and engage and interact with the program in a Dialogue is thus an existential necessity.” meaningful way.” 160 164 Talking about the world is also how children build knowledge—and the more knowledge Connecting. One of the key insights to emerge from they build, the more able they are to participate in dis- the last few decades of research in cognitive science is cussions about how things work. Describing the world that the human brain thinks in terms of relationships. and developing knowledge and awareness are reciprocal To really understand something, young people have to activities in a virtuous cycle. see how it connects to other things they know. By “relat- Describing and evaluating one’s experience also has ing a new item to an already known piece of knowledge, important implications for developing mindsets. Social or otherwise…making an association with it,” children and developmental psychologists have studied the role make a “major advance” in their ability to commit infor- of “self-talk” and attributions in shaping young people’s mation to memory.165 This has important implications attitudes about learning. If children conclude from for developing knowledge—one of the foundational com- 157 Huttenlocher, Waterfall, Vasilyeva, Vevea, & Hedges (2010). 158 Petersen, Bates, & Staples (2015). 159 Smyth & Hattam (2001, p. 411). 160 UChicago CCSR interview with William “BJ” Lohr, consultant, 161 162 163 164 165 After-School All Stars program (October 15, 2014). Seligman (1972). Dweck & Leggett (1988). Yeager & Walton (2011). Freire (1970/1993, p. 88). Hattie & Yates (2014, p. 161). Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 45 ponents in the present framework. As children learn to to something they valued earned almost a full letter group similar things together and organize information grade higher (0.8 grade points) than low-expectation in larger conceptual frameworks, they also increase their students who wrote summaries.168 The importance of ability to retrieve facts when needed. In a comprehen- connecting work to things people care about holds true sive review of How People Learn, John Bransford and his in the workplace as well. A number of studies find that colleagues noted that a key distinction between experts individuals are not only more motivated, but also more and novices is that experts see patterns and relation- disciplined when their work is connected to pursuing ships among the ideas in a field that the novice cannot personally meaningful goals.169 see. 166 Understanding how things are connected allows experts to amass a huge volume of knowledge and quickly cover and develop a sense of the connection between retrieve relevant information. Not only do novices know their own interests and a larger social purpose reinforce fewer facts, but they have more difficulty locating them related processes of motivation and self-regulation. when needed. Providing children with opportunities to Individuals who see tasks or activities as being connect- connect new experiences and new ideas to things they ed to a larger social purpose are likely to engage with already know is critical for building usable knowledge. increased discipline, diligence, and persistence in pur- Creating connections not only helps to build cogni- 46 The opportunities that young people have to dis- suit of their objectives. Young people who are motivated tive understanding, but it also allows youth to direct and engaged in this way are more likely to succeed at their attention. As children grow, their developing the tasks and activities they undertake, perhaps under- brains utilize a complex network of synaptic connec- scoring a sense of self-efficacy as well as reinforcing the tions linking cognition, emotion, and behavior. Perhaps underlying value of what is accomplished. The recursive out of self-preservation in a world that bombards us links between interest, purpose, value, motivation, self- with continual stimuli, the brain only pays attention regulation, and accomplishment are a potential basis to things we see as interesting, relevant, or important. for developing a durable, integrated identity over time. Researchers have found that the value individuals In the absence of connection to something they value, perceive in a given activity is directly related to their young people’s commitments become brittle and dif- motivation to engage in and their ability to focus on that ficult to sustain, particularly in the face of challenges, activity. For instance, the degree to which students setbacks, or failures. perceive an academic task as having value is strongly linked to their choice, persistence, and performance of Envisioning. One of the most critical reflective experienc- the task. es for young people is the act of envisioning themselves in 167 In an experiment in ninth-grade science classes, students completed monthly writing assign- the future. The precursor to this process can be seen in ments about the science topics they were studying. very young children engaged in imaginative play as they One group was asked to write about how the science don a firefighter’s hat, push a miniature grocery cart, care topic related to something they valued, and the control for dolls, or build with wooden hammers. Though young group was asked to write a summary of the science children may talk of being an astronaut or a veterinarian topic. At the end of the year, researchers compared when they grow up, they have yet to develop the capacity the grades of the two groups. Among students who for abstract thought that underlies the notion of “becom- had low expectations for success at the beginning of ing” an adult. Toddlers are aware of daily routines, and by the year, those in the group that connected science the age of four or five, typically developing children will 166 Bransford, Brown, & Cocking (2000). 167 Atkinson (1957); Damon (2008); Eccles et al. (1983); 169 Yeager et al. (2014); see also, Fishbach & Trope (2005); McKnight & Kashdan (2009); Wigfield (1994); Wigfield & Eccles (1992). 168 Hulleman & Harackiewicz (2009). Fishbach, Zhang, & Trope (2010); Mischel, Cantor, & Feldman (1996); Rachlin, Brown, & Cross (2000); Thaler & Shefrin (1981); Trope & Fishbach, (2000); Eccles (2009). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework understand that time is a continuum, that some events First, young people not only need positive images of have happened in the past and others will happen in what they want to become, but also negative visions of the future. what they want to avoid becoming.175 Second, these 170 But it is later in childhood and into early adolescence that a young person develops the ability to positive and negative “future possible selves” must be reflect on his or her thoughts, feelings, goals, and experi- linked to specific behaviors or strategies that will either ences in the past, present, and future—and recognize bring about or prevent the realization of such selves in that there is the same and yet changing “self” across the future.176 Young people are most likely to regulate time. This awareness of the continuity of the self is key their current behavior when they know what is likely to to understanding that actions at one point in time have move them toward their positive future vision and what consequences at another point in time. kinds of behaviors are likely to derail them. In order for Creating developmental opportunities for youth to adolescents to embark on positive paths toward their envision their futures requires adults to understand envisioned future, possible selves and the behaviors the psychological processes underlying identity de- that lead to them need to be reconciled with young velopment. Human beings have a need for a sense of people’s important social identities.177 Social inequali- consistency and predictability that leads us to experi- ties and stereotypes can create significant hurdles for ence the self as relatively stable, but in fact psychologi- low-income minority youth, making it difficult to pic- cal research shows self-concept to be changeable and ture themselves as academically successful or to engage sensitive to external cues. in behaviors that would bring about such success.178 171 In essence, we have many “selves” that develop in different contexts, with different Adults can play a critical developmental role by helping social groups. Each of a young person’s important social young people to envision a concrete, positive future that groups may have its own explanatory paradigm for mak- embraces their important social identities. ing sense of the world and assigning one’s place within Two additional notes are important in helping young it. Social groups act powerfully on young people’s ability people to envision and pursue positive futures. First, to envision their future and their sense of “how high to the multiple social identities that youth maintain (e.g., aim.” 172 Berger and Luckmann refer to social groups as daughter, point guard on the girls’ basketball team, future “subuniverses of meaning” because of their power to pediatrician, younger sister, good science student, retail cue particular frames of reference, ideas of normative sales clerk at the mall, friend in a group of outspoken behavior, and an understanding of who one is and girls) and the associated norms of thought and behavior who one might become.173 Psychologically speaking, associated with each identity make it impossible to keep particularly in early and middle adolescence, “we can all of this autobiographical information “on line” simulta- become the kind of person that people of our group can neously. Oyserman explains that what is present in one’s become [and] we fear disappointing important groups working memory at any given point is likely to be what is by failing to attain group norms and standards.” 174 “cued” or called forth by the present context.179 The self- Research on “possible selves” suggests that, by concept a girl experiences on the basketball court may be itself, envisioning a positive future image of oneself is very different from her self-concept when encountering not enough to motivate behavior. Psychology profes- her big brother’s friends in the neighborhood. Second, sor Daphna Oyserman and her colleagues argue that across contexts, humans seek to maintain a sense of particular conditions must be in place in order for positive regard for the self.180 This means that youth envisioning to lead to improved outcomes for youth. will interpret situations in a way that allows them to feel 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 Oyserman, Terry, & Bybee (2002). 177 Oyserman & James (2011). 178 Espinoza-Herold (2003); Labov (1982); Oyserman (2008); Curtis (1998). Markus & Kunda (1986); Swann (1997). Harvey & Schroder (1963). Berger & Luckmann (1966); Oyserman & Markus (1998). Oyserman & Fryberg (2006, p. 21). Oyserman & Markus (1990). Oyserman, Bybee, & Terry (2006). 179 Oyserman (2001). 180 Rogers (1959); Weick (1995). Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 47 competent and keep their self-esteem intact. When they can…” Again, adults play an important role in helping find themselves in a context in which they are performing young people incorporate their experiences and accom- poorly (e.g., in a school setting in which they are not being plishments into a cohesive vision of themselves. academically successful), children and youth are likely performance advantages. When different social identi- tive sense of themselves, creating “counter-definitions of ties are not integrated, a person might not have access reality and identity.” to bodies of knowledge or modes of behavior that she 181 For example, a poorly performing student may discount the importance of academic success possesses, if such knowledge and behavior are associ- or of the particular task at hand (“This is a stupid assign- ated with a social identity that is not being cued in the ment anyway!”) to protect his self-concept. Alternatively, present situation. For example, researchers found that he may reframe the classroom not as an academic setting the performance of Asian women on academic tests in which he performs poorly, but as a social setting in depended on whether their gender identity or their cul- which he is popular and has desirable status. tural identity was cued at the time of the test. Activating If an envisioning activity is conducted in a context 48 Integration of one’s social identities can have specific to “subvert” that setting in some way to restore a posi- their gender identity resulted in lower math scores that does not cue the kinds of self-conceptions that and higher verbal scores, while activating their Asian would lead to positive behaviors—for example, in a identity resulted in higher math scores and lower verbal high school classroom where teenagers have imposed scores.182 This line of research suggests that “even their own social reality—then the envisioning activ- though one might theoretically possess the expertise or ity is likely to be unsuccessful. For envisioning to be a know-how to solve a problem, certain knowledge systems productive developmental experience, adults need to may not be accessible at a given time because the relevant pay attention to creating a supportive context that will social identity is not activated.” 183 Some researchers embrace young people’s important social identities and theorize that individuals with higher levels of identity integrate those identities with positive future visions. integration should be better at activating multiple social identities simultaneously, which should then give them Integrating. Ultimately the goal of any developmental simultaneous access to the different knowledge systems experience is to integrate the insights, developing skills, associated with each social identity.184 Following this or other lessons the experience generates into one’s line of thought, young people who are able to integrate larger sense of self in a way that expands a young person’s various experiences and the lessons learned from those competencies and agency in the world. This is particu- experiences into an integrated sense of self should be larly important throughout adolescence, as young people better able to draw on the full range of their experience engage with the task of constructing a cohesive identity. to inform their actions in a wide range of settings. While younger children can make connections to feel- The box entitled Youth Profile: Ana illustrates what ings, experiences, or potential roles, adolescents can in- the process of developmental experiences, including tegrate these into a sense of themselves. For example, as the processes of meaning-making, can look like for a teenagers experience success in one arena, particularly high-school aged youth. In a youth theater group, Ana after some amount of struggle, integration means apply- encountered new ways of being in the world, was able ing that success to inform a larger sense of who they are to connect her own life experience with larger social and what they are capable of. Integration moves a young issues, had opportunities to tinker and practice as part person from a stance of “I did that” to embrace a larger of preparing a theater production, and came to envision implication for one’s identity: “I’m the kind of person who new possibilities for herself. 181 182 183 184 Berger & Luckmann (1966, p. 153). Shih, Pittinsky, & Ambady (1999). Cheng, Sanchez-Burks, & Lee (2008, pp. 1178-1179). Cheng, Sanchez-Burks, & Lee (2008). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework YOUTH PROFILE Ana At age 13, Ana was a studious and sensitive girl, talkative around people she knew well, but not a natural performer. But the summer before her eighth-grade year, encouraged by a friend, she walked to a nearby park field house and signed up for a series of free workshops led by Chicago Youth Theater. Right from the start, she encountered new ways of interacting with other people. At first, the physical and shared their own knowledge of the topic. Ana’s parents are Mexican immigrants and her father contact required by many of the theater exercises is in danger of deportation, which is a constant source of intimidated Ana. She recalls one that required pairs stress in her own life. But as the company shared their to sit back-to-back on the floor with their arms hooked stories, interviewed neighbors, and then traveled around and try to stand up. But she observed how uninhibited the city to hear other stories from immigration activ- the older students who were long-time ensemble mem- ists, Ana realized that she was not alone. She was able bers seemed. “Everyone seemed OK with holding hands to reflect on her experience and connect her family’s or locking arms and stuff,” she says. “Everyone seemed situation to larger social and public policy issues. With comfortable with each other.” the directors, she and other students attended rallies as In school, she was shy. She says, “I just wasn’t good at working with people. I just kind of kept to myself a lot.” But the theater workshops gave her a chance to ex- participants, like one to stop a deportation center from being built. During the rallies and the interviews, she listened to periment with new ways of expressing herself through adults who were immigrants or activists describe and her body and voice and to collaborate with peers in evaluate their own experiences with immigration. improvising a scene. As she observed and experimented, the daring of the ensemble members began to rub off on her. She says, “It was a lot of putting yourself out there, being yourself, and being really goofy. In school people hold themselves back a lot, and people here just let themselves go. It was weird but comforting at the same time.” The company creates original productions based She integrated what she learned into her own belief system. “You slowly find out what you believe in and what you don’t,” she says. “Immigration is an issue I’m always going to be passionate about. If it wasn’t for Chicago Youth Theater, I wouldn’t know how strongly I feel about it.” As the interviews progressed, the directors selected the most compelling material from the transcripts for the company to read through and discuss. Next came on true stories gathered from cast members, their improvisation assignments based on the transcripts. families, and neighbors in the multi-ethnic community. Company members tinkered for months with staging, She joined when she was a freshman in high school, and characters, movement, and sound. The improvisations the theme for that year’s production was immigration. were video recorded and later incorporated by the As a first step, the company members sat in a circle directors into a final script. Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 49 Mounting a full-scale production required a hugging people or looking in people’s eyes showing emo- tremendous amount of practice with feedback from tions. It was for the audience members to really get this.” the directors, continuing even after opening night. Ana’s desire to contribute to the audience’s understand- This was especially true for Ana as her tenure in the ing allowed her to transcend her own discomfort. company grew and she took on more demanding roles. At the end of her junior year, she played a woman Beginning her sophomore year, the directors began to encourage Ana to think about college. Although a who, with her husband, rescues a niece from an abusive strong student, Ana, whose parents left school at a home. The role was a pivotal one, as the aunt and uncle’s young age, had never considered it. But her encounters love is what transforms the young girl’s life. with college through college tours with the company, “I’ve never been one who exposes my feelings,” Ana college counseling with the directors, and talking with explains. “It was hard. I just had to strip away that ensemble members who were becoming first genera- shell and be open.” tion college students, she began to envision a different A sense of a higher purpose motivated her to per- future for herself. “When you’re in a group of friends and severe, despite her frustration with the challenging they get all excited for college and they’re ready for it, emotional content, until she finally broke through. “It it influences you,” says Ana, who applied to college this was for the story,” she says, “not how comfortable I felt fall. “It assured me I’m capable of doing it.” 50 UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Summary of Developmental Experiences Developmental experiences thus set the stage for acting In summary, developmental experiences that provide with agency in the world in an ongoing cycle. young people with opportunities to act and reflect Importantly, although each type of experience has constitute the raw material from which the foundational been presented one-by-one in this chapter, in reality, components and key factors of young adult success are youth often engage in numerous types of experiences built. Developmental experiences are those that expose simultaneously and there is no hierarchy of complexity young people to new ideas, people, and perspectives; or suggested ordering for the types of experiences. The provide opportunities to engage in hands-on learning; box entitled Developmental Experiences Align with include demonstrations of expert performance and mod- the Connected Learning Approach illustrates an align- els of high quality work to emulate; offer extended time ment between the framework of Connected Learning to practice and develop competencies; and ultimately and the concept of developmental experiences.185 allow young people to contribute their unique gifts to Indeed, “when a concrete experience is enriched by the world. Further, developmental experiences offer reflection, given meaning by thinking, and transformed opportunities to reflect upon one’s learning, to “name by action, the new experience created becomes richer, the world,” to evaluate ideas, and to make connections broader, and deeper.” 186 Developmental experiences between one’s actions and other things one cares about. often occur in the context of youth’s interactions with Finally, developmental experiences support young adults and other children, and these social relationships people in integrating disparate occurrences into a larger are the instruments through which adults can guide sense of themselves in a way that propels them forward. and shape development. Developmental Experiences Align with the Connected Learning Approach This chapter discusses a range of action and reflection opportunities that help youth feel connected to their experiences and make meaning of them. Although each of these opportunities has been presented as distinct (e.g., opportunities to encounter, and then to tinker, and then to practice, and then to choose), in practice, high-quality experiences for youth entail combinations of actions and reflections every day. Youth programs and school-based interactions should be built around providing multiple, ongoing opportunities for such experiences. One approach that supports this idea is called “connected learning.” 187 Connected learning brings together adolescents’ learning experiences across inschool and out-of-school spaces, purporting that youth learn best when learning is “socially embedded, interest-driven, and oriented towards education, economic, or political opportunity.” 188 Ito and her colleagues argue that youth are engaged in their own learning only when it is driven by their interests. Such experiences and learning can then be connected to educational or career opportunities or civic engagement. The connected learning approach suggests that youth 185 Ito, Gutiérrez, Livingstone, Penuel, Rhodes, & Salen (2013). 186 Kolb & Kolb (2009, p. 309). 187 Ito et al. (2013). need spaces to make contributions and share their work with peers; to be driven in their work by their individual interests and build expertise in areas they value as significant to themselves; and to have people around them who can make the necessary connections between their interests and academic domains/institutions. Connected learning “seeks to integrate three spheres of learning that are often disconnected and at war with each other in young people’s lives: peer culture, interests, and academic content”. 189 These experiences can help make youth’s experiences hold more meaning and relevance for them, and connect these interests and experiences with futureorientated images of themselves. The design principles identified in a recent report on Connected Learning align closely with the notion of developmental experiences for youth. They highlight the need for active participation by youth; learning by being given the opportunity to do (or practice); having adults who provide appropriate challenges to push youth in areas in which they have deep interest; and support in making connections between what youth are experiencing within their interest-driven activities and other external academic and cultural experiences. 188 Ito et al. (2013, p. 42). 189 Ito et al. (2013, p. 63). Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 51 Developmental Relationships as Critical Contexts for Learning 52 so much reside “in the head” of an individual, but rather within a “community of practice” into which young Cutting across the literature on child and youth de- people can be apprenticed. This notion of apprentice- velopment is a consistent emphasis on the importance ship provides a helpful metaphor for thinking about of social relationships. Social interactions provide developmental relationships. children with opportunities to enact behaviors, elicit The developmental role of social relationships starts feedback, and reflect on what happens. To the degree from the earliest moments of life. Interactions between that activity and reflection are consistently guided in infants and early caregivers form the basis for infants’ strong, supportive, and sustained relationships with emotional experiences and set the stage for future adults, they provide critical opportunities for children relationships. The level of attachment security set in to experiment, learn, and grow within and across the infancy (secure versus insecure attachments) remains various contexts they inhabit every day. Where those largely stable through adolescence.191 A stable and opportunities are lacking—where children have few responsive caregiver strengthens an infant’s developing chances to interact or experience the world, where agency and self-efficacy by allowing for exploration in feedback is poor, where reflection is hampered in one a stable and safe environment.192 Learning how to fashion or another—children’s ability to integrate manage brief and moderate stress, such as hunger or novel experiences and increasingly complex learning discomfort, is a part of healthy development, and into their identities is often blocked. The iterative and attachment to stable and responsive adults ameliorates fundamentally relational processes of experiencing, in- the distress a young child experiences with such teracting, and reflecting represent a critical engine for stressors.193 As children mature, relationships grow children’s development and as such are the core of the in sophistication and variety, becoming both more conceptual model linking experiences and relationships important and more complex. The centrality of fam- with young adult success. ily relationships gives way somewhat as children enter Developmental experiences offer multiple oppor- school and spend increasing amounts of time with tunities for adults to play important supportive roles peers. Non-familial adults also become increasingly in building youth’s self-regulation, knowledge and important. The character and quality of relationships skills, mindsets, and values. Social relationships are can vary substantially across the life course as young important not only in supplying broader access to op- people’s inclination and capacity to engage socially portunity, but also as a means through which young with others deepen and become more central to their people learn about themselves and their place in the growing sense of self. wider world. One well-adopted theory, called situated Drawing from Bronfenbrenner’s 194 description of learning theory, argues that learning does not happen optimal relationships, Li and Julian define four criteria in an abstract sense; rather, it always emerges as part for developmental relationships—attachment, reciproc- of a transaction between a young person and his or her ity, progressive complexity, and balance of power—that social environment. they argue “consistently promote positive development 190 In this way, knowledge does not 190 Lave & Wenger (1991); Vygotsky (1978). 191 Center on the Developing Child (2004); Hamilton (2000); National Research Council and Institute for Medicine (2000); Thompson (2008). 192 National Research Council and Institute for Medicine (2000). 193 In the absence of secure attachments with stable and responsive adults, strong, frequent, or prolonged exposure to stress in the early years can have damaging effects on learning, behavior, and health for years to come (Center on the Developing Child, 2012; Fox, Almas, Degnan, Nelson, & Zeanah, 2011; Shonkoff, 2011). Neural circuits for responding to stress and threats are particularly susceptible to early experiences (Davis et al., 2007; Huizink, Robles de Medina, Mulder, Visser, & Buitelaar, 2003; Weinstock, 2005). Prenatal experiences and early exposure to stress can result in a person being overly reactive or completely shutting down in reaction to stressful situations throughout the lifespan (Loman & Gunnar, 2010; Shonkoff, 2011). These long-term consequences also have important implications for executive functioning and working memory in older children and adolescents (Shonkoff, 2011; Evans & Schamberg, 2009). 194 Bronfenbrenner (1979). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework for children and youth across diverse developmental different reasons. Maybe they think their art teacher is so settings.” cool because she introduced them to so many neat things, 195 Building upon this work, researchers at the Search Institute have laid out a framework describ- and their dad at home, maybe he’s a cool engineer and ing developmental relationships as a locus not only they’re able to share different experiences together.” for communicating and providing care and support to Connected to this view of developmental relation- youth as they grow, but also as a critical site for express- ships is a vision of those relationships as being recip- ing challenge and expanding opportunities. rocal. In being so, youth not only passively receive or 196 The Search Institute framework highlights five access the various kinds of resources and opportunities elements of developmental relationships to serve as created by virtue of their social relationships, but also guideposts for adults in schools and other youth-serving have opportunities to participate actively in the larger organizations—and that dovetail with the key compo- contexts within which those relationships occur and to nents of developmental experiences outlined above. First, contribute positively to them. UChicago CCSR’s review developmental relationships create opportunities for of noncognitive factors in school performance noted adults to express care—to be present, warm, invested, that the belief that one is recognized and valued as a interested, and dependable. Second, developmental rela- member of an academic community is key to engaging tionships are a key site in which to challenge growth—to and succeeding in that context.197 This sense of “be- inspire, to express clear expectations, to stretch think- longing” has been associated with success in school,198 ing, and to set and enforce appropriate boundaries and while feeling unwelcome or threatened has been associ- limits. Third, developmental relationships provide a ated with poorer performance, as seen in the literature space in which to communicate and provide support—to on stereotype threat 199 and bullying. 200 encourage, to guide, to model, and to advocate on youths’ Research by Scales, Benson, and Roehlkepartain behalf. Fourth, developmental relationships represent addresses how the reciprocal path of developmental an important venue in which to share power—to dem- relationships relates to the concept of thriving. 201 onstrate respect, to give voice and listen carefully, to re- Thriving, particularly during adolescence, focuses spond thoughtfully, and to collaborate openly with youth. attention on young people’s self-identified “sparks”— Finally, developmental relationships provide a key avenue passions, interests, skills—and creates opportunities to through which to expand possibilities—to explore new support, develop, and nurture them over time. 202 The ideas and experiences, to connect youth to helpful others, nurturing of one’s passions is key to the development and to navigate challenging experiences or barriers that of a “confident and secure idealized personhood,” 203 deflect youth from their goals. similar in many respects to our concept of integrated Blair Root, the director of a youth neighborhood club, identity. The focus on thriving illustrates the recipro- emphasized the importance of children having develop- cal nature of developmental relationships, with an mental relationships with multiple adults that provide emphasis on nurture and support, on the one hand, opportunities to act and reflect. “I think it’s important and on the creation of opportunities for participation that kids have different role models in their lives for and contribution, on the other. Reciprocal relation- 195 Li & Julian (2012, p. 157). 196 Search Institute (2014). 197 Farrington et al. (2012). 198 Osterman (2000). 199 Steele (1997); Steele & Aronson (1995). 200 Elias & Zins (2012). 201 Scales, Benson, & Roehlkepartain (2011). 202 See also Benson (2008); Benson & Scales (2009). The notion of attending to youth’s own interests is also in line with the Connected Learning theory (Ito et al., 2013); see box Developmental Experiences Align with the Connected Learning Approach on page 51. 203 Scales, Benson, & Roehlkepartain (2010, p. 264); Lerner, Brentano, Dowling, & Anderson (2002). Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 53 ships may be especially critical during developmental words, the enactment of the plans and intentions via the transitions, such as the transition from middle grades practices of adults in the setting. What actually occurs into high school, when the task of negotiating the shift- in the moments when adults and youth interact may or ing boundaries between connection and autonomy can may not align with either best intentions or the descrip- leave youth more vulnerable. 204 tion of practices as set forth by planners. Social relationships provide important opportuni- 54 Any time an adult puts a practice in place, it is ties for youth to sharpen their awareness of themselves, influenced by a plethora of adult-, youth-, and situation- others, and the larger environment. Strong, supported, specific characteristics. How an adult actually enacts and sustained relationships with caring adults provide a practice can be shaped by the adult’s personal ori- an important space for youth to experiment, try out entations, how well the adult is able to interact with roles and behaviors, and receive feedback that helps particular youth, and even the adult’s own development to shape how they ultimately construct an integrated of the foundational components we highlight for youth identity. As youth work toward an understanding and (e.g., self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, or articulation of their goals and values, the feedback values). Enactment can also be shaped by the train- and opportunities for reflection provided by social ing, experience, assumptions, capacities, and “working relationships with adults provide a key avenue for the theories” that adults in a setting bring individually to development and integration of identity, as well as the their work. For example, some teachers might believe formation and support of mindsets, the development that young people in urban environments will benefit of competencies, and the building of agency. Creating most from a “tough love” approach that prepares them a social context that supports the development of the for the harsh realities of the outside world, so they are foundational components and key factors for young particularly strict in enforcing policies around atten- adult success requires not only careful and intentional dance or late work. Other teachers in the same school planning by adults, but also long-term commitment to might believe that these same young people most need young people in their care. nurturance and warm relationships with trusted adults, Enactment of Developmental Practices so they enforce school-wide tardy and late work policies much more leniently. Some parents might believe that young children benefit most from unstructured play The cumulative theory and evidence on developmental and opportunities to be creative, while other parents experiences and developmental relationships means believe it is critical to take a strict, disciplined approach that educators, mentors, and program staff would do to academics as soon as possible with young children. well to extend their attention beyond design and plan- Sometimes conflicting beliefs are held by caregivers ning, and to focus on understanding youth experience. within the same organization or the same family, and Within any given setting that children and youth inhab- these individual biases or preferences come through it, adults generally have positive intentions and want regardless of the pedagogical or childrearing approach to act in the best interests of the young people with the caregivers might have mutually agreed to. whom they work. In formal settings such as schools The “official” orientations and practices endorsed by and youth-serving organizations, adult practices are a school, a youth program, or even a family may have less largely planned in order to effect positive change in influence on a child’s development than the ways prac- kids’ lives. Despite these intentions, a key consideration tices are actually enacted “in the moment” by the adults is how practices actually get delivered by the teachers, in those settings and experienced by the child. A daycare program staff, parents, or other caregivers—in other program may endorse the practice of modeling positive 204 Scales, Benson, & Roehlkepartain (2011, p. 265); Collins & Steinberg (2006). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework problem-solving for young children, but the daycare evidence of contributing to gaps in academic achieve- provider may (unintentionally) raise her voice and ment that are observed upon entry to formal schooling become harsh when she feels stressed. A harried father and widen as students advance through school. 208 might put great value on punctuality, but in practice he Children who grow up in more affluent families do might often be late to pick up his child from school. It is not necessarily have “better” developmental experi- therefore critical that adults pay close attention to how ences, just more of them. It is important to emphasize intended practices are actually enacted within a given that “high culture” activities that are more readily setting. Ultimately, it is not the intention but the enact- available to the children of upper-middle-class families ment that influences the experiences young people have may not be developmentally superior to activities more and the meaning they make of those experiences. easily accessed by low-income urban or rural chil- Differences in Developmental Opportunities and Needs dren. Looking for frogs in a drainage ditch can meet a child’s need for exploration, discovery, and knowledgebuilding just as well as a trip to the science museum. Daily life provides no end of experiences that help Still, compounded differences in the availability of children exercise self-regulation, develop knowledge high-quality early childhood programs, effective and and skills, shape their mindsets, and build their values. engaging K-12 schools, books in the home, after school But we know that “daily life” can vary substantially activities, libraries, music and arts programs, sports for young people across race and class. Children in the and recreational activities, and museums and other cul- United States are afforded different access to experi- tural institutions end up significantly favoring children ences and opportunities in their homes, schools, and from wealthier families. 209 Ensuring that all young communities, depending in large part on differences in people have access to a multitude of rich developmental financial resources. An extensive body of prior research experiences—from early childhood through adoles- documents the negative effects of child poverty, which cence—is imperative to helping youth develop the key extend well beyond low socioeconomic status and factors for success in young adulthood and the founda- include a wide array of associated conditions, including tional components that underlie those factors. heightened social isolation, greater levels of parental A further advantage that accrues to the children of and child stress, limited parental investment (of both wealthier families has to do with their early accultura- money and time) in children’s development, less ac- tion into dominant cultural norms and settings. All cess to health care, higher exposure to environmental children grow up learning cultural navigation skills toxins, and lower academic achievement. that allow them to move with relative ease around their 205 As of 2012, one out of five children ages 5 to 17 in the United States own neighborhoods and communities, 210 but those was living in poverty. Roughly one-third of all African skills do not always readily transfer to new contexts. American, Latino, and Native American children grow A white child from the wealthy Chicago suburb of up in poor households. Winnetka would be just as out of place and ill-equipped 206 While families in poverty are often rich in other developmental assets (e.g., strong to make his way through the violence-plagued streets of familial ties, dual languages, strong narrative tradi- Chicago’s Roseland neighborhood as would the Roseland tions, entrepreneurial skills, and other valuable “funds native in Winnetka. The difference is that the child from of knowledge” Winnetka can go his whole life without having to learn 207 ), we know that differences by income in parental investment in children’s informal educa- how to navigate Roseland, but the child from Roseland tion—for example, through sports clubs, summer camp, cannot gain access to “cultures of power” in American travel, and computers and books in the home—show life 211 without figuring out how to navigate Winnetka. 205 Berliner (2009); Yoshikawa, Aber, & Beardslee (2012). 206 Aud et al. (2012). 207 González, Moll, & Amanti (2005). 208 Kaushal, Magnuson, & Waldfogel (2011). 209 Lareau (2003). 210 Lareau (2003); Patton (2013). 211 Delpit (1988, 1995). Chapter 2 | The Importance of Developmental Experiences and Relationships 55 Children who grow up learning dominant conventions each developmental stage and strategies for creating and behavioral norms that are also in operation in thoughtful and intentional developmental experiences. schools and workplaces have more ready access to these Though experiences are the fields within which chil- institutions. In this way, low-income and minority youth dren develop, they aren’t enough to ensure that children have to learn additional skills—the ability to navigate are building the foundational components for future other social contexts—and have to integrate more dispa- success. One of the objectives of this project is to help rate identities to be on equal footing with children who program developers, practitioners, and caregivers think were born into the dominant social culture. more intentionally about how the practices they are im- In light of children and youth’s differing needs and plementing are, or can be, aligned with the developmen- developmental opportunities, adults are challenged to tal outcomes they are trying to support in children and figure out how best to support the development of each youth, given their individual needs. It is in the context child and coordinate this development across settings. of strong and supportive social relationships with adults Critical to achieving this goal is providing teachers, par- and peers that children learn to make meaning of their ents, childcare workers, program providers, and other experience, come to understand themselves in relation caregivers with both knowledge about what matters at to others, and situate themselves in the world. 56 UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework CHAPTER 3 Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood Key Points • Development is multifaceted (social, emotional, attitudinal, behavioral, cognitive, physical), and each aspect of development is inextricably connected to the others. • To provide the most appropriate and supportive developmental experiences for youth, adults need to understand development itself as well as how to match the right supports and sets of challenges for growth to the particular developmental stage of the youth they work with. • The practices of adults are more effective when they are intentional, are focused on the foundational components and key factors that support the ability to transition successfully into young adulthood, and take a developmental perspective. The development of the key factors of young adult success (agency, integrated identity, and competencies) and the four foundational components that underlie them (self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values) occur at different rates for different individuals from early childhood through young adulthood. • Consistent and supportive interactions with caregivers provide the greatest opportunity for cognitive stimulation in ways that can have long-lasting impacts on children’s development. Whereas appropriate stimulation supports continuing development, a lack of stimulation can create barriers to subsequent development, potentially requiring more intensive intervention later. • Key tasks of each developmental stage are listed below. However, it is crucial that adults not exclude other areas of development when engaging with children and youth; nearly every aspect of the foundational components and key factors is forming, or is at least being influenced by the experiences youth encounter, at every stage of life. • In brief, the key developmental tasks during early-life stages of development are: • Early childhood (ages 3 to 5): Self-regulation; interpersonal (social-emotional) knowledge and skills • Middle childhood (ages 6 to 10): Self-regulation (self-awareness and self-control); learning-related skills and knowledge; interpersonal skills • Early adolescence (ages 11 to 14): Group-based identity; emerging mindsets • Middle adolescence (ages 15 to 18): Sense of values; individuated identity • Young adulthood (ages 19 to 22): Integrated identity • A successful transition into young adulthood relies on a firm footing of the foundational components: an awareness of self and others to support selfregulation and planning; knowledge and skills about self and the world, developed at home and through school and other learning activities; mindsets that project a self-belief and support one’s agency to achieve goals; the values a person holds for self and society; and the identity choices one makes, hopefully based on a broad sampling of possibilities. The Foundations for Young Adult Success developmen- inhabit. It is important to note that development is tal framework includes four components (self-regula- always occurring, whether with intentional support tion, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values) that and carefully constructed opportunities for positive provide the foundation for three key factors in young growth or not. Individual, contextual, and larger adulthood (agency, integrated identity, and competen- structural forces continually interact to shape the cies). The framework highlights the crucial role played course of one’s development across all stages of child- by developmental experiences and developmental rela- hood and adolescence. 212 tionships within the larger contexts that young people 212 Bronfenbrenner (1979). Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood Developmental relationships help stretch young 57 people to be the best versions of themselves. When up to young adulthood: early childhood (ages 3 to 5), interactions between caregivers and children are in- middle childhood (ages 6 to 10), early adolescence tentional and informed, as well as organized to provide (ages 11 to 14), and middle adolescence (ages 15 to 18). experiential opportunities for growth, they are more For each stage, we ask four questions: likely to support positive learning and development and lead to a young adulthood with agency, an integrated identity, and a set of competencies that enable success. However, in order to design and deliver the most effec- that influence development in this stage? 2. What are the primary areas of development in this stage? tive experiences for youth, it is imperative to under- 3. How do experiences shape development in this stage? stand where youth are developmentally throughout their 4. How is development in this stage related to develop- young lives. This understanding makes it possible for adults to match experiences and interactions to the developmental needs of young people. In considering what we know about how children 58 1. What internal or external changes are taking place ment in other stages? We conclude by discussing how development in these four stages culminates in preparing youth for a develop, this chapter focuses on how each of the successful transition into young adulthood (between foundational components and key factors matures the ages of 19 to 22), highlighting how effective sup- over time. As documented in the literature, different ports throughout the years increase the likelihood of a skills develop at different rates over the life course. youth having agency, an integrated identity, and strong Below, we highlight the most prevalent areas of growth competencies. We pay particular attention to identity during each stage of development, with an eye toward development and integration. This chapter specifically (1) which foundational components or key factors are touches on how identity matures from one stage to the most influenced by input, experiences, and interactions next, even if it is not a key developmental task during a with others at each stage; and (2) which components particular stage. As a preview, the serious development or key factors need to be developed during the earlier of identity does not begin to take place until adoles- stages to facilitate positive development at later stages. cence, but the antecedents are there from the earliest The chapter provides an overview of current knowledge days of life: based on a review of the literature and discussions with experts from a range of backgrounds. 213 This over- A mature understanding of identity requires view is not meant to be a comprehensive or exhaustive being able to connect and find patterns in discussion of development. Rather, the goal is to provide one’s actions and beliefs across time and practitioners with access to a common description situations, actively associating with these of how the foundational components and key factors underlying traits, and viewing the self as develop over time and which ones are the primary foci purposefully creating such continuity in be- during each stage of development. havior. Given the complex nature of these 214 We start our examination of development at the cognitions, identity development dispropor- preschool years, at age three, when children begin to tionately takes place during adolescence. be exposed to institutions outside their families and However children begin to form concepts of homes. We then present the most salient and malleable the self and agency much earlier in life, and areas of development during four life stages leading these serve as precursors to identity. 215 213 A more extensive discussion of the key areas of development across stages of early life can be found in a memo drafted by UChicago CCSR, which can be obtained from the authors by request. 214 Admittedly, the quantity and quality of evidence around each of these life stages is uneven; one of the main tasks in reviewing the research evidence to date has been to identify areas in which broad understanding is yet incomplete. 215 Rote & Smetana (2014, p. 438). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Each of the following sections describes the primary advances taking place during early childhood, including developmental tasks as they relate to the foundational com- rapid development of the prefrontal cortex, preschool- ponents and key factors, and explores the implications of aged children often experience newfound capabilities in those tasks for supporting youth development. Although we writing, physical coordination, memory, regulation and highlight key tasks in each developmental stage, it is crucial inhibition, and even metacognition; they become able to that adults not exclude other areas of development when explain why they took a series of actions, for example. 218 engaging with children and youth; nearly every aspect of Though the prefrontal cortex does not fully develop the foundational components is forming, or is at least being until an individual’s mid-20s, the foundation created in influenced, at every stage of life. early childhood is critical for ongoing development. 219 In addition to the development of cognition, young Early Childhood children are learning about emotions and how to (Preschool-Aged Children; Ages 3 to 5) interact with other people. Crucial to later identity Early childhood—roughly ages 3 to 5—is a stage of development, preschool-aged children are developing tremendous growth and development. It is during this a sense of self; they understand that they are different period that young children build upon their earliest from others and are able to define themselves as such in interactions with parents and other caregivers and increasingly concrete terms. In addition to an increas- begin to feel a sense of independence, while learning ingly concrete sense of self, young children also develop how to identify and regulate their emotions and be- gross and fine motor skills during this period. Often in haviors. According to Erikson’s stages of psychosocial parallel with an emerging sense of identity, children development, young children struggle with initiative vs. manifest an increasingly sophisticated sense of their guilt. 216 In other words, children want to start setting own agency, which began in infancy. They know that their own goals and deciding their own actions. When they can invoke actions that will lead to something else adults around them give support and guidance, young happening, particularly around using objects. As we children likely achieve a sense of purpose and some de- will see, the “world” in which a child exercises agency gree of agency, at least within the small sphere of their will continue to broaden as he or she gets older. influence. However, when adults do not allow children to develop their own initiative, children may have a What Are the Primary Areas of Development in deep sense of guilt about their desires to act. Early Childhood? Researchers and practitioners who work with young Key Questions children suggest that there are two key areas of de- What Internal or External Changes Are Taking Place velopment on which to focus support during the early that Influence Development in Early Childhood? childhood years: self-regulation and social-emotional The grounding for children’s expansion of abilities lies skills—or the ability to interact well with other children within the brain as it changes and develops in response (overlapping with our notion of interpersonal skills). to children’s experiences. The growth and molding of (See Figure 5). Barbara Abel, a curriculum manager for young children’s brains are responsible for the more ba- Educare Chicago, an early education program, high- sic elements of coordination, movement, and alertness, lights how focusing on these areas is crucial, as young as well as higher-order activities such as abstraction, children can only begin to learn content once their inhibition, and planning. social and emotional needs have been addressed: 216 217 218 219 217 Because of the neurological Erikson (1950/1963). Berk (2007). Diamond (2000). Diamond & Lee (2011). Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood 59 For me, the main thing I’ve been working FIGURE 5 on is children’s capacities to self-regulate. Early Childhood (Preschool, Ages 3-5) And when I say self-regulation I mean self- CON regulation in terms of emotional regulation, behavioral regulation, and attention CY EN OWLEDG KN S K I L L S E & manager, Educare Chicago220 Self-Regulation. Early childhood represents an important opportunity to help children develop OTHERS SELF WORLD SE self-regulation, including behavioral, attentional, L F- CO and emotional regulation.221 Self-regulation enables a young child to begin acting independently O REG ULATI VA L U E S processes. —Barbara Abel, curriculum CONCEPT AG LF- point of being able to access the cognitive ET SE the social-emotional in order to get to the DSETS E regulation…I lead with the emphasis on MIN CR N MPE ENCIES T within her personal and social context and to have 60 greater success with learning.222 Underlying the Early Childhood development of self-regulation is an improve- are better able to follow directions, cooperate with ment in executive function (EF) skills (see section (Preschool, Ages 3-5)are learnother children, and attend to what they in Chapter 1 entitled Self-Regulation for further ing. Research also links early EF skills to later description). The emergence and early develop- success in the workforce, in health, and in social ment of EF skills correlate closely with the early relationships.225 Conversely, the lack of early development of the prefrontal cortex, described in emotion and behavior regulation is linked to adult the previous section; the brain continues to refine crime, violence, and other negative behaviors.226 these new neural connections and EF skills into adolescence.223 Interpersonal Knowledge and Skills. The other Developing control over emotions, behaviors, key developmental task during early childhood and attention early in life is the basis for engaging is the development of knowledge and skills that in increasingly complex thinking and more mul- support young children’s abilities to relate to, tifaceted interactions as children develop. Among cooperate with, and form relationships with other young children, self-regulation—particularly emo- people, particularly other children. During the tion regulation—is related to a more successful preschool years, children further develop their transition into schooling, earlier understanding that there is a “self ” and 224 an early indicator for later academic success. Children who are able to can distinguish their own from others’ emotions. monitor and manage their emotions and behaviors Children begin to understand that others can have 220 UChicago CCSR interview with Barbara Abel, curriculum manager, Educare, Chicago (April 21, 2014). 221 Alternatively, in our conversations with several experts, they suggested that the focus on self-regulation and executive function skills may actually be overstated. They argue that the attention these developmental skills receive in practice may simply be due to the research attention it has received in more recent years. However, much of the literature does suggests that self-regulation is central to school achievement and is a marker of adaptive development (e.g., Blair, 2002; Blair & Razza, 2007; Morrison, Ponitz, & McClelland, 2010), a perspective that was supported by interviews with early childhood practitioners and research on the perspectives of kindergarten teachers (Foulks & Morrow, 1989; McClelland, Morrison, & Holmes, 2000; Rimm-Kaufman, Pianta, & Cox, 2000). 222 Morrison et al. (2010). 223 Center on the Developing Child (2011). 224 Eisenberg & Fabes (1992). 225 Diamond & Lee (2011); Moffitt et al. (2011). 226 Caspi, Henry, McGee, Moffitt, & Silva (1995); Liu (2004). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework different thoughts, beliefs, and feelings than the to distinguish between the two and act on that knowl- self does, and that those beliefs and desires lead edge can be considered some of the earliest foundations people toward particular actions. of morality—an important component of the values that 227 As children’s general understanding of other people advances, a young adult will ultimately embrace. so does their relationship with other children. They acquire the ability to interact with multiple How Do Experiences Shape Development in peers, often while engaging in pretend play. Early Childhood? Nothing about early childhood development can be The social interactions that preschool children have thought of as existing in a vacuum. A reciprocal influen- with peers lay the groundwork for learning an array of tial nature exists between the rapid neurological devel- skills that will be necessary for successful social inter- opment that infants and young children experience and actions when they are older. For example, play not only their opportunities for interactions. These opportunities requires but also helps to support all kinds of critical are in turn shaped by several layers of children’s ecosys- aspects of self-regulation, including attentional, behav- tem, 231 including the immediate environment in which ioral, social, emotional, and cognitive regulation. 228 they interact and learn (their parents, peers, early educa- The back-and-forth communications that young tion program) and larger ecosystems that may include children engage in during play help children learn how local politics, social services, and even larger attitudes, to take turns and listen (inhibiting their own desire to values, and beliefs of the culture they live within. interrupt), begin to understand their own feelings and The most crucial way adults provide supports for a beliefs and those of others, and understand that those young child is by being consistently responsive to that different feelings and beliefs influence the behaviors child’s needs. 232 This enables children to feel secure so of each individual. Early interactions with peers (and that they can comfortably explore new facets of their the support young children get from adults in success- world. Children with secure attachments will reference fully negotiating these interactions) help to shape how the adults around them during their preschool years to children interpret the world (e.g., thinking that people gain feedback on whether their emotional or behavioral are pleasant or hostile). And as children get better at reactions are appropriate in a given context. One aspect understanding their peers, they begin to develop a sense of adult-child interactions that are especially important of self-efficacy about their ability to be socially en- in the early years is language. Being exposed to linguis- gaged. 230 Thus, the origins of some of the mindsets (e.g., tically-rich interactions helps support the development openness, self-efficacy) that are crucial during the tran- of a child’s own language and ultimately their overall sition from adolescence into young adulthood seem to development. However, there are great disparities in first emerge in young children’s interactions with peers. how much language young children hear from their Early social and emotional development, accompanied caregivers. 233 Children from low-income families by supportive interactions with adults, produces the hear as many as 30 million words fewer than their earliest signs that children can distinguish “right” from higher-income peers 234 and these differences are “wrong”; having these emotional and cognitive abilities related to differences in early language development. 235 227 Wellman, Cross, & Watson (2001). 228 Berk, Mann, & Ogan (2006); Bodrova, Germeroth, & Leong 232 Bowlby (1982). 233 Hart & Risley (1995). 234 Hart & Risley (1995). 235 Hoff (2003); Huttenlocher, Waterfall, Vasilyeva, Vevea, & 229 (2013). 229 National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2000). 230 Harter (1982); Ladd and Price (1986). 231 Bronfenbrenner (1979). Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood Hedges (2010); Rowe (2008). 61 Children’s own language development, in turn, You know that day when you oversleep and influences a variety of other areas of development, you wake up and you’re an hour late for including children’s ability to recognize, understand, an important meeting or it’s your first day and manage emotions and behaviors. Between the at work on a new job and you realize that ages of two and five, several lines of research suggest you’ve overslept? What do you feel like? that language development is a critical component of developing and understanding thought and emotions and self-regulation of emotions. 237 Dysregulated kids feel like that much of 236 Recent work sug- constantly flowing, your cortisol levels gests that targeted interventions with parents can elevated, with your heart beating a little too help create a more language-rich environment for fast, not knowing which way to turn—how their young children. do you expect someone to learn? And so if 238 Conditions created by poverty and inequality—par- 62 the time. So imagine, with your adrenaline some children have all these factors that can ticularly neglect and toxic stress—have an especially compromise their capacity to self-regulate, large impact on early neurological development, poten- then we have to look at classrooms and tially producing lasting challenges to be overcome, such we have to say, ‘How do we create a place as a child’s later ability to succeed in educational or that makes all the children feel safe so that learning activities. 239 Specifically, traumatic experi- they can attend?’—Barbara Abel, curriculum ences in childhood can lead to an over-development of manager, Educare Chicago242 the midbrain and brainstem, producing hyper-reactive and aggressive behaviors. 240 Alternatively, neglect can Indeed, laying the groundwork for positive develop- lead to an under-development of the limbic and cortical ment in future years requires careful and intentional regions, which can cause difficulty in cognitive process- support from adults, but also recognition that young ing. children have a great number of capabilities. Decades 241 Together, trauma and neglect represent a toxic combination for young people, associated with lower of research in developmental psychology support the levels of self-regulation and social-emotional skills in notion that even children as young as three years old later years. Especially when working with underserved benefit from the types of developmental experiences children, adults need to create spaces and experiences and developmental relationships laid out in Chapter 2. that are both safe and cognitively stimulating. Adults can provide children with varied experiences Adults best meet children’s needs when these and options for how they would like to spend their time, contextual factors are taken into account. Barbara which encourages children’s love for exploration and Abel, the early childhood curriculum manager at learning. Providing limits to opportunities, likewise, Educare Chicago introduced earlier in the report, helps young children grow to respect boundaries and describes this nuance in working on self-regulatory exercise self-regulation. They need experiences that processes with young children, many of whom come allow them to “tinker” or experiment and they benefit from very impoverished backgrounds: from positive role models. Young children flourish when they have adults in their lives who help them put 236 Luria (1961); Vygotsky (1962). 237 Cole, Armstrong, & Pemberton (2010). 238 Leffel & Suskind (2013). 239 Shonkoff et al. (2012). 240 Perry (2006). 241 Perry (2006). 242 UChicago CCSR interview with Barbara Abel, curriculum manager, Educare Chicago (April 21, 2014). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework language to their experiences and link what they are The links between early development and later learning to things they already know (“connecting”). For development suggest that a focus on early interpersonal example, high quality preschool classrooms are struc- skills and self-regulation can help set children on a tured in ways that allow children to make many of their positive course of development, whether it is in an aca- own choices, such as which center they want to spend demic setting, in their social lives, or at home. Through their time in during free play. They can feed the interest the use of scaffolding—or supporting children in their they are having in the moment and, with support from current stage of development in preparation for the teachers, can “tinker” with all sorts of objects. Effective next stage—adults can help structure the environment teachers do not tell children explicitly how to make for young children so they can gradually learn how to something work; rather they let children explore, exper- plan, focus their attention, and achieve goals with fewer iment, and fail, and then help them make sense out of and fewer supports. 246, 247 that failure so they can try something again, ultimately achieving what they set out to do. Middle Childhood How Is Development in Early Childhood Related (Elementary School-Aged Children; Ages 6 to 10) to Development in Other Stages? Children in elementary school, ages 6 to 10, are in The benefits of investing in early development have the developmental stage known as “middle childhood.” become increasingly clear in recent decades; long-term This represents a period during which children estab- studies following high-risk children who attended lish a growing sense of competence, independence, and high-quality early education programs show great self-awareness upon which later identity development advantages for them compared to similar children who will build. 248 The changes children experience during did not attend such programs. 243 Economic models this stage are driven by three factors: increased cogni- estimating returns on investment show that early tive advances that allow for greater and more abstract childhood programs (birth through preschool) have a thinking, self-regulation, and reflection; social changes larger rate of return than programs implemented at any that reflect an expanding set of relationships with both other point during the life cycle. adults and peers; and institutional changes that expose 244 James Heckman and his colleagues have attempted to understand the children to comparison and competition across mul- ways in which early interventions lead to greater adult tiple domains (e.g., social relationships and academic outcomes; they find that it is not an increase in IQ, but achievement). 249 These cognitive, social, and institu- rather the development of noncognitive factors that tional changes define the substantial, if often under- accounts for most of the positive effects. Children appreciated, challenge of middle childhood: learning who attended the Perry Preschool, who were the basis how to navigate multiple contexts in transition while for this analysis, spent a considerable amount of time establishing a more stable sense of self. 245 learning social skills and self-control (i.e., interpersonal knowledge and skills, and self-regulation)—the two primary developmental tasks highlighted here. 243 For example, Schweinhart, Montie, Xiang, Barnett, Belfield, & Nores (2005); Campbell & Ramey (1995). 244 Heckman (2008). 245 Heckman, Pinto, & Savelyey (2013). 246 While early childhood is a critical period of development, it is also a difficult time in which to identify those who may need intervention. Children develop at very different rates, and because so much of what is changing in the early childhood years requires maturation of the brain, it is easy to misdiagnose a child as having behavior problems when he is Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood simply physiologically behind. This is an especially precarious time to make strong statements about which children will need severe interventions and which ones just need a bit more scaffolding in early stages of regulatory development (National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, 2000; K. Magnuson, personal communication, June 4, 2014). 247 Center on the Developing Child (2011). 248 Eccles (1999). 249 Eccles (1999). 63 Key Questions academic competencies. Instead, most What Internal or External Changes Are Taking Place teachers deemed following directions as that Influence Development in Middle Childhood? the skill that they believed was the most Cognitively, children in middle childhood develop and important. Consider the nature of activities in refine the ability to think in increasingly abstract ways, kindergarten—students need to listen to their including the capacity for systematically handling more teachers, engage in self-directed and small complex representational ideas. group work, get into line, make transitions 250 In early child- hood, children may be able to perform simple tasks between activities. Engaging in any of these that require the coordination of one or two discrete activities successfully requires self-regulatory ideas; the ability to think abstractly and systematically abilities. —Sara Rimm-Kaufman, professor about things that are not immediately present begins of education, Curry School of Education, to develop around ages 6 to 7, culminating in children’s University of Virginia253 ability to understand the logic of concrete objects and As Rimm-Kaufman describes, children are chal- events. 251 This ability to understand concepts more 64 theoretically helps to grow children’s understanding lenged in many new ways as they enter formal schooling of themselves; during this stage, they expand the ways environments, and are expected to exhibit extensive in which they understand who they are to include more self-regulation in ways they were never expected to psychological aspects of themselves, including their before. At the same time, children have increasing capabilities and emotional states. exposure to peers and other (nonfamilial) adults, and 252 Children frequently make multiple institutional decreased time spent with families. Thus, while chil- transitions during middle childhood, including the dren in the elementary grades are learning to manage entry into formal education (elementary school) around their behaviors, they are also using interpersonal skills age six. This transition presents children of this age to negotiate new friendships and managing increasingly range with a new challenge: the need to regulate their independent interactions with peers. behavior across different settings. As they enter a formal school setting for the first time, children face new expec- What Are the Primary Areas of Development in tations that they adapt their behavior appropriately for Middle Childhood? this new setting—a setting that could be very unlike oth- As with younger children, those in middle childhood are er places they have experienced. One of our interviewees, continuing to develop their self-regulation and inter- Sara Rimm-Kaufman, a researcher at the University personal knowledge and skills. On top of that, there of Virginia who focuses on applied work, describes the is a large emphasis on developing learning-related, or kinds of changes children face in this new setting: academic, knowledge and skills (see Figure 6). We asked over 3,000 kindergarten teachers Self-Regulation: Self-awareness and self-control. from around the country about what they, Children’s cognitive development is evident not as teachers, see as the most critical skills only in advances in their formal reasoning, but for students to have when they make the also in their capacity for self-reflection—in both transition into school. Our initial hunch academic and social settings. During these years, was that teachers would talk about the brain development allows children to hold onto importance of early reading skills or other more information at a single point in time and to 250 National Research Council (1984). 251 Piaget (1952; 1946/1951; 1970). 252 Rote & Smetana (2014). 253 UChicago CCSR interview with Sara Rimm-Kaufman, professor of education, Curry School of Education, University of Virginia (May 22, 2014). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework FIGURE 6 Learning-related skills and content knowledge. The aforementioned growth in self-regulation Middle Childhood (Elementary School, Ages 6-10) and metacognitive abilities has ramifications for ABS AC enact learning-related skills, they exhibit behaviors like self-control, staying on task, organizing work materials, working independently, listening and fol- OWLEDG KN S K I L L S E & SE L F- CO REG ULATI VA L U E S OTHERS SELF WORLD lowing directions, and participating appropriately CONCEPT AG LF- EN SE CY strengthening learning-related skills. When children T DSETS MIN TR in groups. 258 As children progress through middle childhood, the ability to plan, evaluate, and modify their use of strategic learning behaviors develops further. This improvement in learning-related skills helps to support the influx of new knowledge ON obtained during these years. And indeed, a primary focus within elementary schools—particularly in the MPE ENCIES T earlier grades—is on the acquisition of the content knowledge needed to succeed academically in future years. There are good reasons for this emphasis. Middle Childhood reflect on internal and external stimuli as they First, this is a time period when children’s cogni- abilities to engage in all aspects of self-regulation learning and increased understanding of more 254, 255 Ages 6-10) (Elementary School, become less egocentric. In fact, children’s tive abilities expand and allow for more effective complex concepts. Second, when children do not expand—in perceiving stimuli, planning, managing, acquire early content knowledge, they are likely to and reflecting. The further development of executive fall behind their peers academically; this follows function skills and more abstract thinking enables children throughout the elementary school years greater awareness and meaning-making in the in- and beyond. 259 creasingly social settings in which they spend time. General cognitive developments also support Interpersonal skills. Middle childhood is a time when another type of awareness during middle child- children spend increasing amounts of time with other hood: metacognitive awareness—that is, thinking children, and their growing cognitive capabilities about one’s own thought processes. Metacognition combine with these new experiences to help strength- allows children to reflect on and adapt their use of en their interpersonal skills. Children’s growing concrete, specific learning skills and strategies (e.g., capacity for self-reflection also manifests in increas- study habits). ingly complex perspective-taking, whereby children 256 With the start of formal education, middle childhood is an especially important time become able to handle others’ perspectives and to co- for parents and educators to be thinking about ways ordinate multiple social categories. 260 Adult support to develop children’s self-regulatory skills, includ- is vital to helping children build healthy peer relation- ing various types of awareness; these skills underlie ships and negotiating these new tasks; the ability to many of the behaviors and attributes that are develop positive friendships with peers through the associated with successful school adjustment, 257 use of interpersonal skills and behaviors will facilitate a predecessor to continued success in school. positive outcomes later in life. Conversely, the devel- 254 The term “egocentric” is commonly used in the development literature, as it marks a transition from children seeing the world and themselves from their own perspective to seeing them from multiple perspectives. 255 Markus & Nurius (1984). Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood 256 Eccles (1999). 257 Blair (2002). 258 McClelland, Acock, & Morrison (2006). 259 e.g., Clotfelter, Ladd, & Vigdor (2009); Fryer & Levitt (2006). 260 Flavell (1977); Watson (1981). 65 opment of poor relationships during this period puts especially in schools—often hones in on cognitive devel- children at risk for emotional and behavioral issues in opment and content knowledge. However, a deeper look adolescence and in adulthood. expands this perspective and highlights that several 261 For those children who struggle with peer acceptance, there is also an other foundational components are maturing during increased likelihood in adolescence of dropping out of this stage of life as well. These include self-regulatory school and encounters with police. processes; knowledge and skills beyond content knowl- 262 edge, including learning and social skills; and early How Do Experiences Shape Development in mindsets about a person’s capabilities to accomplish Middle Childhood? their aspirations. As adults consider the range of devel- As the increase in cognitive function facilitates an opmental experiences and interactions they provide for increase in self-reflection and perspective-taking, elementary school-aged children, it would behoove them children begin making sophisticated social compari- to consider the varied needs of youth in this age group. sons, including comparing and contrasting their own behavior with that of their peers. 66 263 A supportive While the current literature on this developmental stage does examine children in new social situations, environment is vital to the development of a child’s the focus is primarily on children in the context of the self-concept, and in middle childhood, a child’s sense classroom. In particular, researchers have made great of self becomes both more stable and more abstract. 264 strides recently in identifying the ways self-regulation in There is a great emphasis on the need for developing middle childhood is associated with adaptive classroom a strong sense of oneself as capable and independent. behaviors, the ways and means by which children form As children gain the capacity to compare themselves friendships based in the classroom during middle child- to others, it is notable that children are likely to think hood, and the ways in which middle childhood is a time about themselves in a manner that highlights the way of cognitive development. However, less research has they are different or how they stand out from others. focused on children in family and community contexts; 265 They use this information to evaluate themselves as the goal of very little research has been to understand being good at something or not; as such, they begin to how the cognitive, social, emotional, and physical devel- develop early mindsets related to self-efficacy and the opment that occurs during middle childhood happens roles that ability and intelligence play in performing in the multiple domains of the child’s life. Such research well. is undoubtedly needed, since middle childhood is a time 266 While middle childhood remains an important period for developing greater independence, children where many different aspects of a child’s development still rely substantially on adults and institutional set- must fall into place to support the rapid growth and tings to provide consistent structure and feedback on development that will occur in adolescence. their performance, thereby exerting substantial influence on the judgments children reach about themselves, How Is Development In Middle Childhood Related their peers, and their developing identity. to Development in Other Stages? Many of the components articulated in the Development in middle childhood builds directly off Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental of the advances children make in early childhood. As framework begin or continue to develop in middle child- children transition from early childhood into middle hood, laying the foundation for later success. Our review childhood, their cognitive capabilities continue to of the literature indicates a heavy emphasis on cognitive expand greatly. The general cognitive changes that take development during these years; indeed, practice— place enable children to think more abstractly, rather 261 National Research Council (1984). 262 Kupersmidt & Coie (1990); Parker & Asher (1987). 263 Ruble (1983). 264 Bannister & Agnew (1976); Guardo & Bohan (1971); Livesley & 265 McGuire, McGuire, Child, & Fujioka (1978); McGuire & Padawer-Singer (1976). 266 Gecas (2003); Stipek & Gralinski (1996); Zimmerman & Ringle (1981). Bromley (1973); Montemayor & Eisen (1977); Rosenberg (1979). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework than in very concrete ways. This includes a child’s sense for information processing, and expertise in a variety of of self. For example, most children in middle childhood domains, 270 including “improvements in various aspects view their self-identity as stable, and do not believe they of executive functioning, including long-term planning, can become a completely different person. metacognition, self-evaluation, self-regulation, and the co- 267 Although frequently conceptualized as a developmental plateau by ordination of affect and cognition.” 271 Kelly Dwyer, chief earlier theorists (e.g., Freud, Piaget), middle childhood knowledge officer of Spark, an out-of-school program represents a critical transitional period during which for middle school students, describes the plethora of children establish a growing sense of competence, inde- changes taking place for youth of this age: pendence, and self-awareness upon which later identity development during adolescence builds. 268 A reliance on self-regulation also continues to be Middle school is such an intense time period for kids; they’re growing older in every way crucial in the middle childhood years. As children get you could possibly grow, and they bring older, however, the manifestations of self-regulation that to everything they do…First of all, in begin to change from what they once were. In early their prefrontal cortex all these synapses childhood, self-regulation largely focuses on the man- from childhood get pruned away—things agement of emotions and of interactions with peers. that they’re not really using as much—and As children progress through middle childhood, the the synapses that are in their brain start to goals of self-regulation become broader. They expand become more solid…And then also in their to include how to set goals and develop organizational limbic system, their hormones are basically skills, such as remembering to bring a textbook home like lighting that up, right? And that system is from school to complete homework. This transition into in charge of how a person assesses risk and more advanced types of self-regulation sets the stage how willing they are to take risk…The other for early adolescence when more responsibilities are big thing is, from a personality development placed on youth. standpoint, they’re thinking about who they are in the world for the first time. —Kelly Early Adolescence Dwyer, chief knowledge officer, Spark 272 (Middle School-Aged Children; Ages 11 to 14) The middle grades roughly overlap with the period of Amidst these changes, literature has identified the development known as “early adolescence,” between major developmental task during adolescence as the ages 11 to 14. This developmental phase is a time of great search for identity. 273 physiological, psychological, and social change, including entrance into puberty. Also occurring during this Key Questions period are drastic changes and reorganization in the What Internal or External Changes Are Taking Place brain, particularly in the prefrontal cortex, resulting that Influence Development in Early Adolescence? in significant cognitive developments. Since the foundational components and the key factors 269 Early adoles- cents begin to capitalize on their previous knowledge, for young adult success can only be developed through skills, and self-regulatory abilities to build toward high- interactions with others, or psychological reciprocity, level thinking and more coordinated social activities. young people in this stage will seek a peer group to help They show marked improvements in their deductive advance their development. 274 In particular, early ado- reasoning, cognitive flexibility, efficiency and capacity lescents are using peers to explore some sort of identity. 267 Guardo & Bohan (1971). 268 Eccles (1999). 269 Blakemore & Choudhry (2006). 270 Blakemore & Choudhry (2006). 271 Steinberg (2005, p. 70). 272 UChicago CCSR interview with Kelly Dwyer, chief Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood knowledge officer, Spark (April 25, 2014). 273 Erikson (1950/1963). 274 Erikson (1950/1963). 67 The peer social context becomes much more influen- FIGURE 7 tial during this stage of life, and young adolescents are Early Adolescence (Middle Grades, Ages 11-14) preoccupied with trying to find where they fit. The GRO increased executive function skills and awareness also enable an acute attention to social status among peers. CY OWLED KN SKILLSGE & AG experiences during this period can set them on a trajectory that will continue to influence their development through middle adolescence and young adulthood. C What Are the Primary Areas of Development in Early Adolescence? Youth in early adolescence continue to develop their self-regulation and interpersonal knowledge and skills, OTHERS SELF WORLD SE O L F- MP O RE G ULATI NTITY represents a great time of change, and young people’s VA L U E S or the start of high school. Overall, early adolescence 68 IDE move from elementary school into middle school and/ A D EN enter a very different institutional environment as they -B SE As with youth in middle childhood, early adolescents MINDSETS UP N ETENCIES Early Adolescence but the most salient areas of development during these benefits and influences on early adolescents: crowds years are group-based identity development and a num- contribute to identity development by connecting (Middle Grades, Ages 11-14) teens to a social network and establishing norms of ber of mindsets (see Figure 7). behavior for their members. 277 These changes help Group-based identity development. As young teens adolescents build narratives of themselves separate enter the middle grades, they are very concerned from their family unit, and apply agency toward new with “developing a sense of group cohesion” with interests outside of the home. peers, 275 much more so than in previous stages. The peer group affiliation drives development of Emerging mindsets. As young teens seek out peers foundational components such as mindsets and an who dress, look, and behave like they do to find awareness of self, as well as values derived from their acceptance in a peer group 278 (and simultaneously peer group. Teens “look to their peers for acceptance, change their dress, look, and behavior to fit in), a importance, and unity. Within the context of building number of mindsets are being developed. Here, the peer relations, adolescents learn loyalty, empathy, onset of puberty and the development of sexuality criticism, and rejection.” during early adolescence add complexity to social 276 The sense of belonging they seek shapes adolescents’ early identity, particu- bonds with same-age peers. Any physical features larly their social identity as being autonomous from that seem to differentiate one from the crowd have their parents and family. During this time, youth are a considerable impact on a middle school student’s learning to establish more intimate friendships and view of self, and even a negative psychological staking out some degree of independence from their impact. 279 In particular, the focus on peer accep- parents and families by identifying with a crowd. tance affects young adolescents’ self-efficacy and This identification provides clear developmental self-esteem. 280 As they enter early adolescence, 275 Hazen, Scholzman, & Beresin (2008, p. 163). 276 Gutgesell & Payne (2004, p. 80). 277 Susman et al. (1994). 278 Akers, Jones, & Coyl (1998); Gutgesell & Payne (2004); Hogue & Steinberg (1995). 279 Gutgesell & Payne (2004); Hazen, Scholzman, & Beresin (2008). 280 Self-esteem refers to the general valuing of one’s worth. Whereas self-concept describes the content of the self, self-esteem places a value on that content and is thus associated with positive (pride) or negative (shame, disgust) emotions that coincide with a positive or negative judgment. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework teens experience more day-by-day fluctuations How Do Experiences Shape Development in in self-esteem than they did in childhood, though Early Adolescence? these eventually stabilize over time. The fact that early adolescents are grappling with 281 Important influences on self-esteem in adolescence include these new ways of seeing themselves—in terms of parental approval, peer support, adjustment, and both identity and self-efficacy—has implications for success in school. how they react to the school settings in which they 282 When early adolescents have greater self-esteem, they are more likely to feel a spend much of their time. Jacqueline Eccles and sense of self-efficacy about different activities and her colleagues have shown how cognitive and social relationships they are engaged in. behavior changes in early adolescence collided with As youth transition into the middle grades in school environments and instructional practices in early adolescence, a change in academic attributions a way that undermined students’ engagement and also occurs. Recall that in middle childhood, chil- performance; in essence, they described a lack of “fit” dren begin to sense that they are “good” or “not good” between early adolescents’ developmental stage and at something; in early adolescence, this materializes the middle school environment. 286 These findings into a more articulated distinction between ability are summarized in an earlier UChicago CCSR report: and effort, or “not working hard enough” and “not being smart enough.” 283 Over time, young teens Paradoxically, at a time when adolescents begin to develop a “fixed” mindset (as opposed to are becoming developmentally ready to a growth mindset); that is, they tend to attribute assert increasing personal autonomy and performance increasingly to ability, or at least to assume greater responsibility for their see ability as a more formidable constraint on their learning, middle grades classrooms become performance. more (not less) restrictive, placing greater 284 These emerging mindsets have implications for students’ success as they navigate emphasis on teacher control and diminish- the transition into high school. For a significant ing opportunities for student choice and number of students, their performance attributions, independence. Second, at a time when early coupled with their doubts about the malleability adolescents become increasingly sensitive of intelligence, cause them to withdraw effort just to social comparison, instructional practices when the academic context requires both more in middle grades classrooms tend to reward effort and better use of appropriate strategies for ability over effort and highlight social com- learning. The emphasis on social comparison in parison. Third, at a time when adolescents the middle grades also sets up a context in which develop the ability to engage in more less prepared or lower performing students do not complex, abstract forms of problem-solving, want to call attention to their learning struggles the academic demand of class assignments and “may adopt behaviors and strategies to avoid declines during the middle grades—school- failures—devaluing challenging tasks, self-handicap- work often becomes less (not more) ping, and withdrawing effort altogether.” challenging. 287 285 281 Alasker & Olweus (1992). 282 DuBois, Bull, Sherman, & Roberts (1998); Luster & McAdoo (1995); Steinberg & Morris (2001), 283 Nicholls & Miller (1984). 284 Covington (1984); Dweck & Leggett (1988); Nicholls & Miller (1984). Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood 285 Farrington et al. (2012, p. 56). 286 Eccles, Lord, & Midgley (1991); Eccles & Midgley (1989); Eccles, Midgley, & Adler (1984). 287 Farrington et al. (2012, p. 57). 69 Creating successful contexts for early adolescents— environment of middle and high schools constitute a whether inside or outside of schools—would require mismatch between developmental stage and the environ- that we meet their developmental needs for increasing ment, which exacerbates many problem behaviors. 289 independence from adult control, extended interaction By attending to Jeffrey’s interests and adapting his experi- with peers, exploration with things they have interest ences to those interests that he holds (a key aspect of de- in, and opportunities to engage in increasingly complex velopmental relationships), Jeffrey is more likely to engage forms of thinking, communicating, and problem-solving. in learning; the experiences presented to him support a It also calls for attending to the various foundational higher level of connection between his apprenticeship components that are in play during every experience an and school, and thus an expansion of his existing skills. adolescent has. One example of a program that is helping to support youth in these ways is Spark, an out-of-school How Is Development in Early Adolescence Related apprenticeship program that works with middle grade to Development in Other Stages? students to address the issue of disengagement that As the focus moves from middle childhood to early ado- occurs in middle school. Their executive director of lescence, there is a distinct shift in the literature from an Spark, Chicago describes: emphasis on the development of self-regulation and early social interactions toward the development of identities— 70 Students in middle grades don’t find a direct particularly adolescents’ social and academic identities. link between what they’re doing in school During these early adolescent ages, youth are continuing and their life. Classroom learning is not tied to to develop abstract thinking and focusing more on the their personal interests and it’s not hands-on. comparison of the self to others. These developments So they’re bored by the way they’re learning… allow for further refinement of self-awareness and execu- Spark is trying to make those connections for tive function skills, including self-regulation, metacog- students. One example is a student, Jeffrey, nition, setting goals for oneself, and the application of who was struggling in math but loves to learned strategies, all of which support the achievement skateboard. We paired him with a mentor at of academic, social, and personal success. Youth in early an architecture firm for his apprenticeship. adolescence are also laying the groundwork for later For his Spark project, he actually got to build identity development, particularly the various identities a skate park because, of course, that ties and opportunities for agency that will emerge in different to his interests, and he was super excited. parts of their lives as they move into their later teen years. But then, Jeffrey starts to understand why In short, the middle grades may be best understood geometry is important and how he might as a time of intense transition as young teens begin to relate math to something that he likes and is pull away from family and seek to establish themselves interested in. —Kathleen St. Louis Caliento, in the world of their peers, grappling with the meaning executive director, Spark, Chicago 288 of the self in relation to others. As researchers Gutgesell and Payne observe, “the teen is finding self-expression This example highlights how developmental experi- and forming moral thought while struggling with an ences—in this case, in-school learning vs. an apprentice- emerging image of self in society.” 290 Peers clearly ship aligned to Jeffrey’s interests—can either hinder or have a powerful, ongoing influence on early adolescents’ facilitate youth engagement with exploration and learn- conceptions of themselves, their psychological develop- ing. Indeed, scholars have argued that the more rigid ment, and their daily behaviors, all of which contribute structure, decreased individual attention, and evaluative to their emerging senses of identities. 288 UChicago CCSR interview with Kathleen St. Louis Caliento, 289 Eccles et al. (1993); Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013). 290 Gutgesell & Payne (2004, p. 80). executive director, Spark, Chicago (February 13, 2014). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Middle Adolescence school years is less confined to absolutes (black and (High School-Aged Youth; Ages 15 to 18) white), giving them a higher level of comfort with am- Youth in high school, roughly ages 15 to 18, are in what biguity. This corresponds with a greater acceptance of is known as middle adolescence, the developmental others’ individuality and less emphasis on conformity stage that follows the drastic physical and neurological to group norms that characterized their social relation- changes of puberty. Middle adolescence brings more ships in early adolescence. 291 Their cliques expand to physiological stability and better adjustment—psy- include peers of the opposite sex, and they spend in- chological and social—to the changes that occurred creasing amounts of time in mixed-sex groups. 292 High during the previous stage of adolescence. However, this school-aged adolescents also tend to have somewhat is also a time associated with greater risk-taking and broader and/or more numerous social groups than they experimentation as adolescents advance their various had in the middle grades, and they are more willing to senses of identity and agency. In fact, the fundamen- step out of their comfort zone to experiment with dif- tal developmental task in this stage is for teenagers to ferent aspects of the self. sample widely the broad range of roles and experiences available to them, while not jeopardizing long-term What Are the Primary Areas of Development in health and safety. Middle Adolescence? During the high school years, the major developmental Key Questions tasks include discovering a sense of values and an indi- What Internal or External Changes Are viduated identity (see Figure 8). These rely on develop- Taking Place that Influence Development in ing positive mindsets and knowledge of the self that is Middle Adolescence? differentiated from others. Several factors support greater identity formation in the high school years, including continued increases in Values. In contrast to earlier stages, having a sense of cognitive capacity and changes in adolescents’ social personal values emerges as a self-defining character- relationships. Entrance to high school brings with it a istic for middle adolescents. Whereas young children wide variety of new opportunities and experiences, as define themselves in terms of concrete attributes well as increased academic demands. Though not all and middle-schoolers define themselves by a peer teens engage in or have opportunities for all experi- group, high school-aged youth form a much more ences, it is during this developmental stage that young independent sense of the things they place value in. people generally begin dating and entering into sexual Teenagers in this age range experience a higher level relationships, driving a car (opening up new opportuni- of cognitive functioning, which gives them greater ties for independence), working in paid employment, capacity to identify and reflect on what they value and experimenting with drugs and alcohol; each of about themselves, their peers and family members, these experiences contributes to further development and the world writ-large. They “begin to view them- of various identities in the multiple facets of their lives selves in terms of personal beliefs and standards, and (e.g., as a romantic partner, as an employee). Middle less in terms of social comparisons.” 293 This is impor- adolescents also begin having to make decisions with tant for future endeavors because when an individual both high-stakes and long-term consequences. determines what holds value, he is more motivated Cognitive developments during this phase support to harness his knowledge and skills toward that end; teenagers’ ability to appreciate, learn from, and value in this way, values play a crucial role in exercising different viewpoints. The thinking of teens in the high agency toward realizing one’s potential. Additionally, 291 Shulman, Laursen, Kalman, & Karpovsky (1997). 292 Brown (1990). Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood 293 Steinberg & Morris (2001, p. 91), with additional reference to Harter (1998). 71 establishing a clear set of individual values can How Do Experiences Shape Development in help link past experiences with current and future Middle Adolescence? motivations and behaviors, and thus will be central Neurological changes during middle adolescence lead in forming an integrated identity. to lower levels of self-regulation, resulting in a time 294 Individuated identity. In contrast with early adoles- cence, when youth define themselves by the norms and interests of their peer groups, middle adolescents begin asking “big questions” about themselves, their values, and their place in the world. 295 They are seeking an individuated identity—a sense of who they are independent of others around them. Young people in this age range “are beginning to find their own voice, beliefs, and values; and they are beginning to set and act on personal goals. They are learning to invest in their own learning experiences, productivity, and creativity; and they are forging the enduring motivational These developments play a crucial role in how youth begin to define their individuated identities, and ultimately how well they are able to consolidate their various “selves” into an integrated identity. to seek pleasure and excitement without the benefit of adequate compensatory regulatory control. As Lawrence Steinberg described it, there is a mismatch between “the gas pedal and the brake.” Particularly in the early years of high school, there is an increase in the activity and development of the areas of the brain associated with pleasure-seeking and rewards, while development in the areas of the brain associated with behavior regulation is not complete until later in life. 297 Combine this developmental mismatch with adolescents’ search for individuated identity and this stage of life becomes a time when many teens experiment and put themselves in new situations to try out various potential “selves.” These experiences provide the essential raw material from which they will be able to form a more mature integrated identity. In all these cases, the experience of trying on new roles, exploring the self, and considering one’s place amongst others FIGURE 8 drives identity integration. Lila Leff, founder of Umoja Middle Adolescence (High School, Ages 15-18) I ND CY EN MPE TEN ON S CIE OWLED KN SKILLSGE & Middle Adolescence 294 Côté (2009). (High School, Ages 295 Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013). DENTITY DI CO RE G ULATI choose different roles: ID VA L U E S L F- natural it is for adolescents to tinker, practice, and E AT OTHERS SELF WORLD SE Student Development Corporation, encapsulates how U MINDSETS IV AG 72 structures that will carry them into adulthood.” 296 of increased risk-taking. Some adolescents are wired 15-18) I think one important part of building out an identity is that you practice and play around in things and think about who you want to be in them. And you try on different roles. Think about all the different personalities you can take on when you’re babysitting, or you’re working at the movie theater with kids you don’t go to school with, or you’re doing whatever. Kids need time and room to do that and to figure out: How do I see myself? Can I still be true to myself and 296 Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013, p. 8). 297 Casey, Getz, & Galvin (2008); Steinberg (2007). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Despite this misalignment, the high school context talk differently in different situations? It’s practicing code switching; not because is one setting that drives the development or reinforce- somebody told it to you, but because you ment of foundational components during this period. really experienced it. —Lila Leff, founder, The knowledge students gain through high school Umoja Student Development Corporation 298 education—particularly the knowledge they gain relative to their peers—will affect future success, both by As a practitioner, it can sometimes be difficult to directly affecting the acquisition of further knowledge distinguish between harmless experimentation and and through changes in self-efficacy caused by self- “enduring patterns of dangerous and troublesome behav- awareness of their relative academic standing. Their ior.” ability to overcome self-regulation challenges will 299 Many adolescents exhibit a pattern of problem behaviors that are adolescence-limited and developmen- inform the extent to which they are able to develop tally normative. It turns out that most serious prob- and exhibit important competencies, and high school lems observed in middle adolescence actually had their performance will inform mindsets about the self and start at an earlier age. Accordingly, predicting long-term the self as a student. In the process of identity develop- behavioral problems is best assessed by looking at behav- ment, adolescents need to experiment with new roles iors before entry to adolescence, which places additional and responsibilities and try on new images of the self. importance on monitoring social-emotional behaviors They need to be exposed to and explore “future possible in middle childhood. Most problems that present them- selves” that they might not have previously imagined for selves for the first time in adolescence are “relatively themselves, transitory in nature and are resolved by the beginning or constrained by the school context they are in. 300 of adulthood, with few long-term repercussions.” 301 306 and these opportunities will be fostered Middle adolescents need opportunities to generate Like the mismatch between early adolescents and data about the self in response to the questions that middle schools described in the previous section, we see most motivate them: “Who am I?” “What do I have to evidence of a similar lack of fit between the developmen- offer to others?” and “What can I do in the world?” tal needs of older adolescents and many high schools. Without support for this kind of exploration, adoles- Studies often find that adolescent students exhibit cents in the high school years are not able to fulfill the decreased interest and motivation to learn and seem un- developmental tasks before them. The challenge is in willing to take on the challenging academic tasks of high finding productive outlets and opportunities for their school. 302 Researchers Halpern, Heckman, and Larson developing capacities, such as opportunities in out-of- argue that this is largely because high schools afford school activities, work, and community settings. young people “little opportunity to experience a sense of ownership [or] deepening participation in a goal-oriented How Is Development in Middle Adolescence community” 303 aligned with their developing capacities Related to Development in Other Stages? and interests. When students enter high school, they Early development of mindsets continues to influ- experience a decline in emotional support for learning ence how youth in this stage interact with others and from teachers and peers, respond to their experiences. It remains crucial that as 304 along with a high-stakes assessment environment that amounts to a “motiva- middle adolescents seek out an understanding of their tional framework based on fear,” often resulting in young values and identity, adults encourage youth to be open people’s “intellectual and psychological withdrawal.” to new experiences. When adolescents engage with a 305 298 UChicago CCSR interview with Lila Leff, founder, Umoja 303 Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013, p. 6); see also Certo, Student Development Corporation (January 30, 2014). 299 Steinberg & Morris (2001, p. 86). 300 Moffitt (1993, 2003). 301 Steinberg & Morris (2001, p. 87). 302 Marks (2000); Stipek (2004); Vedder-Weiss & Fortuc (2011). Cauley, & Chafin (2003); DeWit, Karioja, & Rye (2010); Smith (2003). 304 DeWit, Karioja, & Rye (2010). 305 Halpern, Heckman, & Larson (2013, p. 7). 306 Oyserman & Fryberg (2006). Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood 73 wide array of experiences, it lays the groundwork for selectively the values that have particular relevance” to future decisions post-high school. them. 310 Sexual orientation and gender identity become High school adolescents recognize seeming discrepancies in the self, and may describe themselves in terms mary social development in young adulthood is the entry of behavior that can differ according to differing social into romantic and longer-term sexual relationships. contexts (for example, being shy at school, gregarious Sexual experimentation is normal and expected. 311 with friends, and respectful toward parents). As teenag- Throughout the adolescent years, youth are work- ers continue to mature, they report fewer such discrep- ing toward their own notions of identity. By young ancies and a more consistent view of themselves across adulthood, a person with an integrated identity has contexts. 74 consolidated in middle and young adulthood. The pri- 307 Studies also show that “adolescents evaluate “an explicit theory of oneself as a person,” 312 what themselves both globally and along several distinct dimen- Northwestern University professor Dan McAdams sions—academics, athletics, appearance, social relations, calls a “narrative identity,” with explanatory power to and moral conduct.” 308 The ability to recognize these make the many plot twists of one’s life cohere around various “selves,” and understand that they can both be an organized, singular, and agentic sense of self. 313 distinct from one another and still contribute to a single To achieve this notion of rational agency requires a identity, is the basis for what happens in the next stage process of holistic development: integrating the various of development: developing an integrated identity. domains of one’s personhood into one integrated sense Transitioning into Young Adulthood of self, with all the parts working in conjunction to achieve one’s individual and social purposes. (Ages 19 to 22) Late adolescence is a culmination of all the growth and Primary Area of Development in the Post-High development that has transpired from birth to this School Years: Integrated Identity stage. Youth ages 19 to 22 are transitioning from adoles- Erik Erikson postulated that the key task of adoles- cence into young adulthood—a time when individuals cence was to develop a viable sense of identity that begin to make their own decisions about the path they links childhood with adulthood and that situates choice will take as an independent adult. The primary develop- and agency within the individual. 314 Adolescents who mental task of young adulthood is integrating different “do not form a coherent sense of self and values…will social roles into a coherent identity with a stable set of lack a consistent sense of identity as they progress into commitments to roles, values, and beliefs. Compared adulthood.” 315 According to a further articulation of with early and middle adolescence, young adults show Erikson’s theory of identity development espoused by increasing maturity in their selection of and participa- James Marcia, as adolescents get closer to adulthood, tion in social groups. Whereas early adolescents had a they experience more pressure to make choices about strong drive to belong to same-age social groups to fos- their future. Individuals are either able to make com- ter their evolving identity, for young adults “the goal of mitments to particular values and beliefs and integrate independence dominates thinking; vocational, educational, their multiple social roles into their identity, or they and personal issues are major decisions.” adopt a ready-made identity handed to them by others 309 Belonging to a “crowd” grows continually less important as young without really considering a wider range of options, or people display “increasing comfort with [their] capacity they simply give up on making such commitments and to choose among many different groups and to endorse return to a state of identity diffusion. 316 307 Harter & Monsour (1992); Harter, Waters, & Whitesell (1998). 308 Steinberg & Morris (2001, p. 91), with additional reference to 312 313 314 315 316 Masten et al. (1995). 309 Gutgesell & Payne (2004, p. 81). 310 Hazen, Scholzman, & Beresin (2008, p. 163). 311 Gutgesell & Payne (2004); Hazen, Scholzman, & Beresin (2008). Moshman (2005, pp. 89-91). McAdams & Adler (2010). Erikson (1950/1963). Hazen, Scholzman, & Beresin (2008, p. 163). Marcia (1966). UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework this depends on a firm footing of the foundational com- FIGURE 9 Young Adulthood (Post-Secondary, Ages 19-22) I NT Y NC DSETS and self-regulatory control, the knowledge and skills one EG ties, the mindsets one has cultivated, and the values one is OW L E D G KN S K I L L S E & AGE DENT I TY DI VA L U E S C has developed through school and other learning activi- R E AT MIN ponents shown previously: awareness of self and others SE LF OM - R E G U L ATI O PETENCI N ES committed to. Finally, though, they depend on the identity choices one makes, and the extent to which those choices are based on a broad sampling of possibilities. With positive and varied experiences throughout early development, young adults are bound to have the physiological and cognitive capacities they will need to embark on a life that is both independent yet connected to important others. If all has gone well up to that point, or if adults intervened at key points when help was needed, the young adult will most likely be able to integrate her various life experiences, roles, and group memberships into a coherent and autonomous sense of self. The Young adulthood is a critical time period in determin- Young Adulthood ing the future of one’s life. The process of integrating (Postsecondary, Ages 19-22) ultimate goal of positive youth development is to support children, adolescents, and young adults to set their own identity is best supported by exposing young people to aspirations and have the agency and competencies to at- a variety of opportunities and possibilities—of roles, tain their goals. As so clearly stated by one of our inter- perspectives, educational and career paths, and future viewees who works with adolescents and young adults, possible selves—and encouraging them to explore these Leslie Beller, the goal is to develop youth into individuals options, rather than constraining their choices or pushing who exhibit the following: them to quickly choose a long-term path. Success in the developmental task of this stage rests on the foundation The ability to make active choices over their built in earlier stages of life, but it is fundamentally deter- own future, and make legitimate choices mined by the approach older adolescents take to mak- grounded in an understanding of who they ing choices and commitments for their future. In young are, grounded in an understanding of the social adulthood, many youth are continuing to build upon the realities which they face, understanding how foundational components depicted in the Developmental to actually overcome those barriers if desired, Framework for Young Adult Success (see Figure 9); they and to feel confident that the choices they possess stronger reasoning capacities and the ability to make are grounded in their own understanding anticipate long-term outcomes. They have the ability to of themselves and their understanding of their set goals with a narrative that helps support their planful- own context, which would allow systems to not ness and select strategies to achieve them. Their cognitive manipulate them as [they do] often based on growth also enables young adults to overcome the risk- the economic needs. —Leslie Beller, Chicago taking behavior of middle adolescence, and enact better Public Schools, and director and founder, self-regulation over their emotions and behaviors. All of MHA Labs317 317 UChicago CCSR interview with Leslie Beller, director and founder, MHA Labs (January 29, 2014). Chapter 3 | Developmental Progression Toward Young Adulthood 75 What happens as adolescents transition into young a sense of their own agency and ability to take initia- adulthood is strongly shaped by the ways in which and tive; and a robust sense of possibility based on explo- degrees to which earlier developmental tasks were ration. An integrated identity is best achieved when met. They draw upon the foundation laid in each youth are presented with and encouraged to explore a preceding stage or the interventions that have success- wide variety of opportunities and life possibilities and fully compensated for prior developmental lapses. To develop key competencies before prematurely deciding meet the development tasks as one embarks on young on one course or inadvertently limiting their options by adulthood, a young person should be able to draw upon a failing to act. Integrated identity draws on experiences basis of secure attachment/trust; the core components and opportunities, incorporating them into memory to of self-regulation, including awareness and reflection; shape future behavior patterns and self-concept. 76 UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework CHAPTER 4 Conclusion and Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research In the United States today, youth are coming of age amidst substantial and widening economic inequality, coupled with diminishing access to opportunity for huge segments of the population. This delivers a “one-two” punch for far too many chil- knowledge, skills, and self-regulatory capacities that dren: they experience the extra burdens of being on the are essential for productive adult functioning, or the wrong side of the economic divide—food insecurity, un- mindsets, values, agency, and integrated identity that stable housing, exposure to community violence, toxic would enable them to set and achieve goals of personal stress—compounded by stark differences by income, importance and direct their own lives. race/ethnicity, and geography in access to high-quality The good news is that there is a strong convergence educational opportunities, access to preventative of evidence about how young people develop and learn, health care, and parental and community invest- with a growing number of examples of this knowl- ments in experiences that foster learning and growth. edge applied in practice. This report draws upon the Inequality is reproduced in part by limiting young research, theory, and practice knowledge base from a people’s opportunities to develop assets that are valued range of disciplines and approaches, spanning Dewey’s in society. The stark reality is that, whether we think theory of learning from nearly a century ago to recent in terms of traditional domains of academic knowledge findings from neuroscience on how the brain works, and and skills, “21st century” competencies (e.g., problem- synthesizes it into an accessible framework designed solving, critical thinking, and communication), or to guide the efforts of all adults who are responsible for individual artistic or intellectual passions, young raising, educating, or otherwise working with children people face clear and significant gaps in opportunity and youth. In the past several years, a large number of to reach their full potential. This plays out in a number frameworks and standards have been created to provide of ways. For example, as payoffs to advanced education guidance on what young people need to learn. The are rising, 318 post-secondary opportunities that can lay Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental the groundwork for successful young adulthood are in- framework describes how to enact these frameworks creasingly constrained by gaps in earlier opportunities and standards. It characterizes the experiences and to develop basic knowledge and skills from early child- relationships youth need to develop into young adults hood through high school. The sad fact is that, in the who have agency, an integrated identity, and the United States today, large swaths of the population are requisite competencies to successfully meet the denied the opportunities to develop the competencies, complex challenges of young adulthood and become 318 Goldin & Katz (2008, 2009). Chapter 4 | Conclusion and Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research 77 thriving, contributing members of their communities. The vision behind the Foundations for Young Adult young people and what policies and structural changes Success developmental framework is about building a are needed; these form the basis for the research agenda society where all children grow up to reach their full po- needed to guide these transformations. The world we tential regardless of which side of the economic divide envision for the next generation of young people will re- they are born on. Currently, opportunities for rich and quire the joint efforts of educators, youth practitioners, varied developmental experiences through K-12 school- parents and families, policymakers, and researchers. In ing and informal education are largely determined by this concluding chapter, we highlight implications for family resources; to address these inequities, it will not each group. be enough to simply expand options by adding more ing options only improves access for the subset of young Implications for Educators, Youth Practitioners, and Parents and Families people who are more motivated or fortunate enough to A Narrow Focus on Content Knowledge in Isolation live nearby; it still leaves many young people behind. from the Other Foundational Components More systematic change will be necessary to address Undermines Learning and Development the underlying inequities that shape the life chances of Learning and development are holistic processes young people. It will mean building a collective sense dependent on interactions among all of the foundation- of responsibility for expanding the possibilities for all al components (self-regulation, knowledge and skills, young people, not just for our own biological children. mindsets, and values). There may be conceptual well-run programs, providing a few more resources, or reforming a subset of schools. Expanding and improv- 78 how to more effectively support the development of It will also take a transformation of adult beliefs and reasons for distinguishing between “cognitive” and practices within the existing institutions and struc- “noncognitive” factors, but this distinction has no tures that shape children’s learning and development. It functional meaning. Cognition, emotion, affect, and means integrating afterschool providers’ lens of youth behavior are reflexive, mutually reinforcing, and inex- development with educators’ knowledge of learning tricably associated with one another as a part of devel- theory with families’ deep understanding of the unique opment and learning. Adults will make little headway if needs and circumstances of their children. By draw- they target only one particular component or subcom- ing from the knowledge, approaches, and experience of ponent in isolation. A lesson or activity might focus on many different adults from many different settings, we a particular foundational component or key factor—be can give the next generation of young people the oppor- it content knowledge, emotion regulation, a growth tunities they need to meet their full potential. mindset, interpersonal skills, or self-awareness—but The approach described in this report (1) identi- creating an effective developmental experience rests on fies key factors and foundational components of young being intentional about the contributions each com- adult success, (2) considers how the backgrounds of and ponent makes to the learning experience and the ways contexts in which young people live affect their devel- young people are making meaning of that experience. opment, (3) uses a developmental lens, and (4) makes In schools, for example, teachers are not effectively the intentional provision of opportunities for young supporting optimal growth and understanding if they people to experience, interact, and make meaning of attend solely to teaching content knowledge. If the di- their experiences the central vehicle for learning and rections in an algebra lesson are unclear, a student may development. The Foundations for Young Adult Success make meaning of this experience by believing that he developmental framework has clear implications for cannot do algebra, thus undermining his self-efficacy in schools, youth organizations, and families, but with- the class. The student may also decide that algebra does out larger transformations in the policy landscape and not matter and is not worth any effort, preferring this larger societal and economic context, there are limits interpretation to believing he is not capable of doing to what can be achieved. Many questions remain about algebra. In addition, if the teacher does not establish UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework clear routines and expectations for students, the pro- supports they provide to the age of the youth. Although cess of self-regulation necessary for learning becomes all aspects of the developmental experiences described more complicated. If there are unresolved interperson- in this report are relevant at all stages of childhood and al issues among kids in a classroom, their minds might adolescence, they vary considerably in practice depend- be on their peers rather than on quadratic equations. In ing on children’s age and their cognitive and emotional short, the task of ensuring that students learn algebra is development. For example, a reflective experience dependent on every other dimension of learning. might consist of helping a young child understand a Teachers, youth workers, and parents can ask them- hurtful interaction that occurred during free play. By selves questions to ensure they are taking a holistic ap- helping that child remember a time when she was in a proach to learning. Am I making sure that failure is not similar situation, adults can play a crucial role in sup- punished and that my child is encouraged to take risks porting that child’s understanding of others’ feelings. and is open to trying new skills? Do youth have mul- For an adolescent, developmental experiences would tiple chances to improve so they can develop a growth look more sophisticated and be more closely aligned mindset? Am I helping my students develop metacogni- with a youth’s ongoing formation of her identity and tive strategies by giving them time to reflect on the steps vision for who she could be in the future. For example, they took to do a lesson and consider how to improve a teacher might debrief a disciplinary incident with a their performance? Have I provided an opportunity student, reflecting on how others have solved a similar for young people to think about how they might apply disagreement, and how the student’s actions may or this content to things they care about in the world? By may not align with her values and identity. In either intentionally attending to the foundational components, case, the most effective developmental experiences will teachers and other adults can guide how young people focus on the foundational components and key factors make meaning and internalize learning experiences. most malleable and salient in that individual’s developmental stage. Taking into consideration differences Taking a Developmental Lens Is Essential to Ensuring across age ranges and across individual children is cru- That Structures and Practices Meet the Developmental cial for creating experiences that are developmentally Needs of the Young People Being Served appropriate. 319 Although a lot is known about development, too often, there is a mismatch between the structures or practices Ensuring All Young People Have Access to a in a youth setting and the developmental needs of the Multitude of Rich Developmental Experiences young people being served. Schools, youth programs, Is Imperative to Their Success and even families are too often oriented to adult needs Growing up in marginalized communities adds to the and goals (e.g., maintaining classroom discipline) in- complexity of developing into a young adult who is stead of taking a youth-centered approach. For example, poised for success. While having agency equips young during the early and middle adolescent years, school people to make choices and take action, their ability settings become increasingly structured, less social, and to successfully pursue a desired path also depends on less reflective at a time when youth need ample oppor- social relationships, financial resources, and countless tunities to engage with each other, explore their varied other external factors that are inequitably distributed. interests, and have support in evaluating events in rela- Further, the task of “integrating” one’s identity is vastly tion to who they are and who they want to become. more complicated for low-income youth and youth of Adults should have a solid understanding of the de- color than it is for children who grow up within the velopmental needs of the young people they work with social and behavioral norms of the dominant white, and should tailor the developmental experiences and middle-class culture. 320 319 Bredekamp (1987); Copple & Bredekamp (2009). 320 Deutsch (2008); Fedelina Chávez & Guido-DiBrito (1999); Phinney (1989); Phinney & Rosenthal (1992). Chapter 4 | Conclusion and Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research 79 Responding to this reality requires a careful balance of pragmatism and aspiration. The Foundations for Young adolescence—is imperative to helping youth develop Adult Success developmental framework is designed to the key factors for success in young adulthood and the strike a balance between helping youth thrive in the world foundational components that underlie those factors. as it is, and developing the skills and dispositions they one hand, school-based educators, staff in youth develop- Implications for Education and Youth Policy ment organizations, and parents must prepare children to The Foundations for Young Adult Success developmen- succeed in the current economy. For example, in addition tal framework provides an ambitious vision of how to good grades and good test scores, young people from youth-serving adults could think holistically about marginalized groups often need to learn to decipher and development and provide rich experiences that allow navigate unfamiliar social and institutional norms to ac- young people to grow into successful young adults. This cess post-secondary opportunities. Adults do a disservice, is not an endeavor that can be undertaken by heroic particularly to underserved youth, if they do not recognize adults acting alone; it will require parallel efforts to such realities. On the other hand, educators, practitioners, rethink what policies and structures are needed to and parents can equip youth with the skills to challenge provide opportunities to children and youth; support cultural norms and inequitable distributions of resources adults who raise, teach, or care for young people; and that can limit their opportunities and constrain their facilitate coordination and learning across sectors. potential. In addition to laying out how to prepare young An understanding of the need for collaboration across people for the world that is, the report provides guidance settings and agencies to support holistic development on some core questions about the world that could be: How of young people has been gaining traction; efforts such can we design and enact practices within schools, youth as the Strive Network and the Harlem Children’s Zone organizations, families, and communities that inspire have been spreading across the nation. However, one young people to not only reach their own potential, but big obstacle to holistic youth development resides in the also to create a better world? How can we help youth de- focus of current policy in the United States. To become velop the knowledge, skills, mindsets, competencies, and more aligned with knowledge about youth development agency that would enable them to confront injustice and and learning, policy should: (1) shift away from a policy work toward a more inclusive society? focus on content knowledge and standardized tests to need to challenge a profoundly unjust status quo. 321 On 80 opmental experiences—from early childhood through Young people experience events, interact with others, a broader set of outcomes and measures, (2) proceed and undergo a constant process of making observations carefully with incorporating new measures into school and connections to their prior experiences to help them accountability systems, and (3) provide the “safe space” make meaning. They develop preferences, figure out for schools to become learning organizations. strategies for managing relationships and determine whether an experience is something they would like The Current Policy Emphasis on Content to repeat. But if we hope to direct the development Knowledge and Test-Based Accountability of young people toward positive mindsets and values Undermines Practitioners’ Ability to Provide and having self-regulation and skills and knowledge, Developmental Experiences adults need to structure experiences to enhance Policymakers have long been concerned about what positive development and help young people internalize preparation young people need for the future to become the lessons from these experiences. Ensuring that all productive members of society. “College and career young people have access to a multitude of rich devel- readiness” is the current mantra of the education policy 321 This report does not directly address how development of the key factors and foundational components may play out differently for different groups (e.g., by gender, sexual orientation, immigrant status, involvement in the juvenile justice system) and what specific barriers, assets, and needs each subgroup may have. This is a critical area of investigation that should be pursued. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework world, where making students “college ready” is often content knowledge as the sole outcome of interest. As narrowly defined as building their content knowledge this report has shown, the other foundational compo- and academic skills. The broad adoption of the Common nents not only facilitate engagement and learning of Core State Standards is a testament to how widespread content knowledge, but they are also important devel- this view is; 43 states and the District of Columbia have opmental outcomes in and of themselves. Policies that signed on to replace their previous state standards with promote these other foundational components would the new Common Core to better prepare students for help to create conditions that foster both the learning college. The prevailing narrative is one of “gaps” between of academic content and the development of young what students know—particularly what low-income people more holistically. youth of color know—and what they need to know in the new economy. Within this narrative, preparing adoles- Proceed Carefully with Incorporating “Noncognitive” cents for young adulthood depends on broadening access Measures into Accountability Systems to advanced coursework and implementing rigorous The policy window for a more holistic approach to academic standards to ensure that all students graduate the development and learning of young people is open- ready for college. ing; there is growing discontent over standardized Because content knowledge and skills are seen as the testing. Recently, a movement to integrate alternative pathway to a college degree and productive work, test measures of student success into school accountability scores that purport to measure such knowledge and skills systems has gained some momentum, exemplified by have taken on an outsized importance in the educational the California “CORE” districts that have received landscape. Teachers are increasingly evaluated on their No Child Left Behind waivers allowing them to include ability to produce high test scores, a metric that has social-emotional factors and school climate measures in become synonymous with “effectiveness.” Even out-of- place of test scores as accountability metrics. This holis- school programs are pressured to prove their worth by tic approach to evaluating students is in alignment with demonstrating impact on school achievement tests. Test the Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental scores have become the measure against which almost all framework; however, some caution is necessary when educational interventions, pedagogical approaches, and using these new measures for accountability purposes. curricular programs are currently judged. The emphasis Many important questions remain about measur- on academic content knowledge, coupled with an expan- ing noncognitive or social-emotional factors and about sion of accountability metrics based on standardized test their suitability for an accountability system that was scores, has led to a narrowing of the types of experiences developed around standardized tests. When measuring practitioners are providing to young people. Arts, music, a particular construct—for example, student self-effi- physical education, and other “non-core” subjects are cacy—it is difficult to disentangle a student’s prior level eliminated to make instructional minutes for more math of self-efficacy from their gain or loss of self-efficacy as and reading, for example. Afterschool programs are asked a result of being in a particular school or classroom or to have a more academic focus to better prepare students being taught by one teacher or another. Students make for college and career. Teachers are reluctant to devote judgements about their self-efficacy based on their pri- time to relationship-building in the classroom or other- or experiences and may have a different baseline sense wise addressing students’ psycho-social needs because of of what their efficacy is. Further, self-efficacy seems to the intense pressure to stay focused on content delivery. vary considerably from one task or content area to an- Content knowledge is an essential part of what young other. Likewise, there is much murkiness as to whether people need to learn for the future, whether in school, at measured changes in noncognitive or social-emotional home, or in afterschool programs, but it is far from the factors in a school context will be transferable to other only thing that matters. Policies that put too great an contexts. Standards for the developmental trajectory on emphasis on content knowledge and standardized tests measures of noncognitive performance do not exist; create incentives for practitioners to see the teaching of also, it is not clear what constitutes a strong vs. weak Chapter 4 | Conclusion and Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research 81 performance. The development of innovative and more foster developmental relationships that promote good traditional measures of noncognitive factors is a grow- practice. It also means breaking down the siloes that ing field, but further studies validating and better un- exist between practitioners who work in the school and derstanding the properties of these measures and how out-of-school settings so that learning can be shared. they are related to their intended use are needed before consolidating them into school accountability systems. Gaps in the Research This report has drawn on the rich body of research 82 Policy Needs to Provide the “Safe Space” evidence, theory, and practice wisdom and synthe- for Schools and Out-Of-School Programs to sized it into the Foundations for Young Adult Success Become Learning Organizations developmental framework. Through this process we The ambitious vision given in the Foundations for Young have identified knowledge gaps in what is needed to Adult Success developmental framework does not pro- promote more effective policies and practices. One is vide a clear roadmap of specific practices, strategies, in identifying specific developmental tasks that might or programs to implement. Moving from the current have a “critical window,” after which it would be very approach to schooling to a more holistic and develop- difficult to achieve optimal development. Other gaps mentally aligned approach will require trial and error. in knowledge surround the types of positive supports Just as young people need opportunities to tinker and youth need for optimal development from early child- practice in order to learn, practitioners also need oppor- hood through adolescence, or the “dosage” of particular tunities for tinkering and practicing, as well as making kinds of experiences necessary to produce lasting and mistakes, as they learn new ways of teaching and work- transferrable results. ing with young people. In an age when accountability is a dominant way of managing schools, the space to make What Practices and Strategies Promote the mistakes is very small. For real shifts to happen in educa- Development of Identity and Agency? tional practice, schools need to become learning orga- While researchers have learned a tremendous amount nizations that provide opportunities for adults to learn, about development in the last several decades, many and policy needs to provide the “safe space” to do so. questions remain unanswered. In this report, we For the Foundations for Young Adult Success devel- provided a developmental trajectory for the key factors opmental framework to become a guide for parents, for young adult success—competencies, agency, and caregivers, educators, and youth workers, we will an integrated identity. However, this relied on piecing need an equivalent effort to support these adults in together a number of existing theories; rarely if ever building their capacity to create quality developmental has the development of agency, for example, been experiences for youth, a strong identity as experts in studied longitudinally from early childhood through supporting the growth of young people, and the agency young adulthood. Theory has provided guidance on to enact the framework in their daily work. To make how an early sense of “self” underlies later identity this a reality, we need a policy focus on high-quality formation, but this area is understudied in empirical professional development that utilizes the develop- research. While there is converging evidence that mental experiences outlined in the report. Parents and supports each of the developmental experiences we families can also benefit from having the opportunity identify in this report, as well as the importance of to learn more about development and how children developmental relationships, we do not know which learn. Like the youth whom they serve, adults need specific combination of experiences would best opportunities to encounter, tinker, practice, choose, promote the formation of integrated identity and and contribute, and to make meaning through describ- agency. We also still lack a strong understanding of ing, evaluating, connecting, envisioning, and integrat- how all of the foundational components outlined here ing. This means providing the resources and time link directly to the development of competencies, needed to support deep professional communities and integrated identity, and agency. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework What Can Be Done to Intervene with Young People ate implementation into practice. For example, it is very After Developmental Windows Close? unclear whether a particular factor is best conceived as The Foundations for Young Adult Success developmental an individual characteristic that can be cultivated over framework includes four foundational components—self- time (analogous to a skill), or as a situational response regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values— to particular settings, opportunities, or expectations which are all crucial factors in a person’s development (similar to the concept of “engagement,” which can wax toward optimal capacity. What happens if youth do and wane from one moment to the next). Where it might not grow each of these foundational components in the make sense to measure growth over time in the first developmental period during which they are most mal- case, a different approach to measurement might be leable? What types of interventions should we invest called for in the latter case. Further, it can be difficult to in—and for whom and at what period in their lives—if disentangle young people’s prior capacities—what they children seem to be falling behind? And for the youngest walked into a setting with—from changes induced by the children, how can we even be sure that a child is falling setting itself related to adult practice, opportunities for outside of “normative” development, given how very wide developmental relationships and developmental experi- the range of development is during the early years? ences, or the culture and climate of the place. In addition, neither are there standards for the developmental What Is the Interaction of Experiences in trajectory on these measures, nor are there thresholds Different Settings? for what young people need to have in order to attain a This report also raises a number of questions about college degree, hold a family-sustaining job, or achieve the experiences youth encounter in the various set- any other markers of success in young adulthood. tings they inhabit on a daily basis. We know quite well Finally it will be important to clarify how these dif- that what youth experience in school often varies from ferent assessments will be used and whether they are their experiences with friends, at home, or even in other appropriate for the intended use. 322 Practitioners may educational settings. What we do not know is the extent want to be able to assess young people diagnostically to which those experiences need to be coordinated and prior to the beginning of the school year or program supportive of each other, even if they are not teaching to determine how to best structure their practice in the same skills. How much do practices at home support response to individual needs. They may also want or inhibit what teachers, youth workers, and others aim assessments to measure progress in a formative way to do with youth? How aligned do those practices need throughout their interactions with young people and to be? And can effective practices in one setting amelio- adjust their practice as needed, in response to individ- rate negative experiences in another setting? ual students and for the whole classroom or program. Finally, for both the student and classroom or program How Can the Key Factors and Foundational level, practitioners, administrators, and policymakers Components Best Be Measured for Different will want to have some means of making a summative Purposes? judgment about performance and progress. Each of Measurement is a core part of evaluating needs and these uses will require a different type of assessment, gauging progress in any field. With the growing interest and research has an important role to play in better in factors other than academic content knowledge and understanding these assessments and shaping the skills, the number of assessments created to measure discussion around their use. these factors has also grown. As discussed in the policy In short, the demand for measures of noncognitive implications section, a number of questions about these or social-emotional factors has far outpaced the state factors and the assessments complicate their immedi- of the field of measurement for these same constructs. 322 See Duckworth & Yeager (2015) for a discussion of measures and their suitability for different purposes. Chapter 4 | Conclusion and Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research 83 In a case such as this, there is great potential for mea- adulthood so that all of them have ongoing opportuni- surement instruments to be misused, to produce faulty ties to truly reach their potential. data, to conflate statistical significance with meaningfulness, or to otherwise lead practitioners down a responsibility for all young people. It means asking fruitless path. We strongly urge caution in the use of practitioners to question their own beliefs about what measurement tools until the science of measuring these is possible and rethink how they work with young important constructs catches up with the interest in people on a day-to-day basis. It means asking policy- and demand for them. makers to focus on a bigger picture and broader set of Conclusion 84 Making this vision a reality will require a collective outcomes and to consider policies that would support the efforts of practitioners in developing young people. We began this report by asking: What exactly do we It means asking researchers to provide accessible, hope our children will be able to accomplish as adults? meaningful, and actionable answers to core questions What vision guides our work? How do we make that of policy and practice. It means asking families to un- vision a reality for all children? The Foundations for derstand the needs of their children and work with the Young Adult Success developmental framework is a first institutions they cross everyday so that these needs are step in guiding practitioners, policymakers, parents, met. It means asking for change both within existing and researchers in working together around this vision, institutions and structures while also asking what new whether in reimagining how to coach a basketball team, institutions and structures might better serve our vi- reshaping policies in a local school district, selecting sion. Addressing the inequities of opportunities facing an afterschool program for one’s child, or developing a young adults will require more than equipping young study on measuring agency. Ensuring that young people people with the capacity to navigate the world as it ex- grow into successful young adults requires investments ists now, it will mean that they are also able to envision in their learning and development from birth to young and create a better world for future generations. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework References Achieve, Inc. (2012, November). Transforming public reporting to ensure college and career readiness for ALL [Policy Brief]. Washington, DC: Achieve, Inc. and the American Diploma Project. Agostin, T.M., & Bain, S.K. (1997). Predicting early school success with developmental and social skills screeners. Psychology in the Schools, 34(3), 219-228. Akers, J.F., Jones, R.M., & Coyl, D.D. (1998). Adolescent friendship pairs: similarities in identity status development, behaviors, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13(2), 178–201. Alasker, F., & Olweus, D. (1992). Stability of global self-evaluations in early adolescence: A cohort longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 2(2), 123-145. Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. Arnett, J.J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1(2), 68-73. Ashforth, B.E., & Kreiner, G.E. (1999). “How can you do it?”: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 413-434. Astin, A.W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Atkinson, J.W. (1957). Motivational determinants or risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6), 359-372. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Johnson, F., Kena, G., Roth, E., Manning, E., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012-045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo. asp?pubid=2012045 Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. References Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D.H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586-598. Bannister, D., & Agnew, J. (1976). The child’s construing of self. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 24, 99-125. Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personal Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D., Aaker, J.L., & Garbinsky, E.N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505-516. Benson, P.L. (2008). Sparks: How parents can help ignite the hidden strengths of teenagers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Benson, P.L., & Scales, P.C. (2009). The definition and preliminary measurement of thriving in adolescence. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 85-104. Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor. Berger, R. (2003). An ethic of excellence: Building a culture of craftsmanship with students. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Berk, L.E. (2007). Development through the lifespan (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Berk, L.E., Mann, T.D., & Ogan, A.T. (2006). Make-believe play: Wellspring for development of selfregulation. In D.G. Singer, R.M. Golinkoff, & K. HirshPasek (Eds.), Play=learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp.74-100). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Berliner, D.C. (2009). Poverty and potential: Out-of-school factors and school success. Boulder, CO and Tempe, AZ: Education and the Public Interest Center, University of Colorado/Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University. Retrieved from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/poverty-and-potential 85 Berzonsky, M.D. (1989). Bronson, M. (2000). Blair, C. (2002). Brown, A.L., & DeLoache, J.S. (1978). Blair, C., & Razza, R.P. (2007). Brown, B.B. (1990). Blakemore, S.J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013, April 17). Bodrova, E., Germeroth, C., & Leong, D.J. (2013). release/hsgec.nr0.htm Identity style: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4(3), 268-282. School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57(2), 111-127. Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647-663. Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3-4), 296-312. Play and self-regulation: Lessons from Vygotsky. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 111-123. 86 Self-regulation in early childhood: Nature and nurture. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In R. Siegler (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 3-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Peer groups and peer cultures. In S.S. Feldman & G.R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp.171-196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Economic news release: College enrollment and work activity of 2012 high school graduates (USDL-13-0670). Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/news. Campbell, F.A., & Ramey, C.T. (1995). Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3), 353-363. Cognitive and school outcomes for high-risk AfricanAmerican students at middle adolescence: Positive effects of early intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 743-772. Bowlby, J. (1982). Casey, B.J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664-678. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York, NY: Basic Books. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Schooling in capitalist America revisited. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 1-18. Braithwaite, V.A., & Law, H.G. (1985). Structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach Value Survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 250. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Bredekamp, S. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children. The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28(1), 62-77. Casner-Lott, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce. Washington, DC: The Conference Board, Corporate Voices for Working Families, Partnership for 21st Century Skills, & Society for Human Resource Management. Caspi, A., Henry, B., McGee, R.O., Moffitt, T.E., & Silva, P.A. (1995). Temperamental origins of child and adolescent behavior problems: From age three to age fifteen. Child Development, 66(1), 55-68. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2004). Young children develop in an environment of relationships (Working Paper No. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved from http://developingchild. harvard.edu/resources/reports_and_working_papers/ working_papers/wp1/ Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2011). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513-531. Building the brain’s “Air Traffic Control” system: How early experiences shape the development of executive function (Working Paper No. 11). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved from http://developing- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). child.harvard.edu/index.php/resources/reports_and_ Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. working_papers/working_papers/wp11/ Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). The science of neglect: The persistent absence of responsive care disrupts the developing brain (Working Paper No. 12). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved from Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2012). http://developingchild.harvard.edu/index.php/resources/ reports_and_working_papers/working_papers/wp12/ UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Certo, J.L., Cauley, K.M., & Chafin, C. (2003). Students’ perspectives on their high school experience. Adolescence, 38(152), 705-724. Chavez, A.F., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1999). Racial and ethnic identity and development. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1999(84), 39-47. Cheng, C., Sanchez-Burks, J., & Lee, F. (2008). Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1178-1184. Chess, S., & Thomas, A. (1977). Temperamental individuality from childhood to adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 16(2), 218-226. Conley, D.T. (2014). Getting ready for college, careers, and the Common Core: What every educator needs to know. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley. Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children. Côté, J.E. (1996). Identity: A multidimensional analysis. In G.R. Adams, R., Montemayor, & T.P. Gullotta (Eds.), Psychosocial development during adolescence: Progress in developmental contextualism (pp. 130-180). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Côté, J.E. (2009). Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 104(5), 141-147. Identity formation and self-development in adolescence. In R.M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, 3rd ed. (Vol. 1) (pp. 266-304). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E., (2014b). Covington, M.V. (1984). Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., Saez, E., & Turner, N. (2014a). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. (NBER Working Paper 19843). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber. org/papers/w19843 Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vigdor, J.L. (2009). The academic achievement gap in grades 3 to 8. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(2), 398-419. Cole, P.M., Armstrong, L.M., & Pemberton, C.K. (2010). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 4-20. Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1999). Early test scores, socioeconomic status and future outcomes (No. w6943). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Curtis, A. (1998). A curriculum for the pre-school child (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. The role of language in the development of emotion regulation. In S.D.C.M.A. Bell (Ed.), Child development at the intersection of emotion and cognition (pp. 59-77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Cury, F., Elliot, A.J., Fonseca, D.D., & Moller, A.C. (2006). The Collaborative for Building After-School Systems (2013). Damon, W. (2008). CBASS Measurement System. New York, NY: Author. Collins, W.A., & Steinberg, L. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal context. In W. Damon, N. Eisenberg, & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 4) (pp. 1003-1067). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Committee for Children. (2011). Early learning review of research. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cfchildren.org/Portals/0/ The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 666-679. The path to purpose: Helping our children find their calling in life. New York, NY: The Free Press. Davis, E.P., Glynn, L.M., Schetter, C.D., Hobel, C., Chicz-Demet, A., Sandman, C.A. (2007). Prenatal exposure to maternal depression and cortisol influences infant temperament. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(6), 737-746. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). SS_EL/EL_DOC/EL_Review_Research_SS.pdf Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Conley, D. (2012). DeLoache, J.S., Miller, K.F., & Pierroutsakos, S.L. (1998). publications/documents/College%20and%20Career%20 Delpit, L. (1988). A complete definition of college and career readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center Publications. Retrieved from https://www.epiconline.org/ Readiness%20Definition.pdf References Reasoning and problem-solving. In D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 2) (pp. 801-850). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280-299. 87 Delpit, L. (1995). Teachers, culture, and power: An interview with Lisa Delpit. In D. Levine, R. Lowe, B. Peterson, & R. Tenorio (Eds.), Rethinking schools: An agenda for change (pp. 136–147). New York, NY: The New Press. Deutsch, N.L. (2008). Pride in the projects: Teens building identities in urban contexts. New York, NY: New York University Press. Dewey, J. (1938/1969). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier. DeWit, D., Karioja, K., & Rye, B. (2010). Student perceptions of diminished teacher and classmate support following the transition to high school. Are they related to declining attendance? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(4), 451-472. Messages that motivate: How praise molds students’ beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 37-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House. Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. Eccles, J.S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. Future of Children, 9(2), 30-44. Diamond, A. (2000). Eccles, J.S. (2009). Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Eccles J.S., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Development, 71(1), 44-56. 88 Dweck, C.S. (2002). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964. Dignam, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417-440. DuBois, D.L., Bull, C.A., Sherman, M.D., & Roberts, M. (1998). Self-esteem and adjustment in early adolescence: A socialcontextual perspective. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27(5), 557-583. Duckworth, A.L., & Yeager, D.S. (2015). Measurement matters assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237-251. Duncan, G.J., & Magnuson, K. (2011). The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention skills, and behavior problems. In G.J. Duncan & R.J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither Opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 47-69). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78-89. Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman. Eccles, J.S., Lord, S., & Midgley, C. (1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education, 99(4), 521-542. Eccles, J.S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R.E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3) (pp. 139-186). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Eccles, J.S., Midgley, C., & Adler, T.F. (1984). Grade-related changes in the school environment: Effects on achievement motivation. In J.G. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 283-331). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Eccles, J.S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C.M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Development during adolescence: The impact of stageenvironment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90. Dutton, J.E., Roberts, L.M., & Bedhar, J. (2010). Education Trust. (2012). Duncan, G.J., & Murnane, R.J. (Eds.). (2011). Pathways for positive identity construction at work. Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 265-293. Dweck, C.S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 674-685. Advancing to completion: Increasing degree attainment by improving graduation rates and closing gaps for AfricanAmerican students. Washington, DC: The Education Trust. Retrieved from http://www.edtrust.org/dc/publication/ advancing-to-completion-increasing-degree-attainmentby-improving-graduation-rates-a-0 UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R.A. (1992). Emotion, regulation, and the development of social competence. In M.S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior. Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 119-150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Elias, M.J., & Zins, J.E. (2012). Bullying, peer harassment, and victimization in the schools: The next generation of prevention. New York, NY: Routledge. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. Ericsson, K.A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychological Association, 49(8), 725-747. Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406. Fitzsimons, G.M., & Finkel, E.J. (2011). Outsourcing self-regulation. Psychological Science, 22(3), 369-375. Flavell, J.H. (1977). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. Foulks, B., & Morrow, R.D. (1989). Academic survival skills for the young child at risk for school failure. The Journal of Educational Research, 82(3), 158-165. Fox, N.A., Almas, A.N., Degnan, K.A., Nelson, C.A., & Zeanah, C.H. (2011). Erikson, E. (1950/1963). Childhood and Society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co. The effects of severe psychosocial deprivation and foster care intervention on cognitive development at 8 years of age: findings from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(9), 919-928. Erikson, E.H. (1968). Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). Identity, youth and crisis. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co. Espinoza-Herold, M. (2003). Issues in Latino education: Race, school culture, and the politics of academic success. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Group. Evans, G.W., & Schamberg, M.A. (2009). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, and adult working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6545-6549. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109. Freire, P. (1970/1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London, UK: Penguin Books. Fryer, R.G., & Levitt, S.D. (2006). The black-white test score gap through third grade. American Law and Economics Review, 8(2), 249-281. Gecas, V. (2003). Expeditionary Learning (2014). Revitalize Rochester. Retrieved from http://centerforstu- Self-agency and the life course. In J.T. Mortimer & M.J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the Life Course (pp. 369-388). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. dentwork.elschools.org/projects/revitalize-rochester Gestsdottir, S., & Lerner, R.M. (2008). Farrington, C.A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T.S., Johnson, D.W., & Beechum, N.O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research. Positive development in adolescence: The development and role of intentional self-regulation. Human Development, 51(3), 202. Goldin, C.D., & Katz, L.F. (2008). Transitions: Career and family life cycles of the educational elite. The American Economic Review, 98(2), 363-369. Feiler, D.C., Tost, L.P., & Grant, A.M. (2012). Goldin, C.D., & Katz, L.F. (2009). Fishbach, A., & Trope, Y. (2005). Goldsmith, H.H., Buss, A.H., Plomin, R., Rothbart, M.K., Thomas, A., Chess, S., . . . McCall, R.B. (1987). Mixed reasons, missed giving: The costs of blending egoistic and altruistic reasons in donation requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(6), 1322-1328. The substitutability of external control and self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(3), 256-270. Fishbach, A., Zhang, Y., & Trope, Y. (2010). Counteractive evaluation: Asymmetic shifts in the implicit value of conflicting motivations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 29-38. References The race between education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Roundtable: What is temperament? Four approaches. Child Development, 58(2), 505-529. González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 89 Gopnik, A. (2009). Harter, S., & Monsour, A. (1992). Gorman-Smith, D., Henry, D.B., & Tolan, P.H. (2004). Harter, S., Waters, P., & Whitesell, N.R. (1998). Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). Harvey, O.J., & Schroder, H.M. (1963). The philosophical baby: What children’s minds tell us about truth, love, and the meaning of life. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publisher. Exposure to community violence and violence perpetration: The protective effects of family functioning. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(3), 439-449. A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Gould, T. (Ed.). (2011). Guardian of democracy: The civic mission of schools. Philadelphia, PA: The Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania and the Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools. Grant, A.M. (2008). 90 Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58. Grant, A.M., & Hofmann, D.A. (2011). It’s not all about me motivating hand hygiene among health care professionals by focusing on patients. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1494-1499. Guardo, C.J., & Bohan, J.B. (1971). Development of a sense of self-identity in children. Child Development, 42(6), 1909-1921. Gutgesell, M.E., & Payne, N. (2004). Issues of adolescent psychological development in the 21st century. Pediatrics in Review, 25(3), 79-85. Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A.C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York, NY: Routledge. Halpern, R., Heckman, P.E., & Larson, R.W. (2013). Realizing the potential of learning in middle adolescence. West Hills, CA: The Sally and Dick Roberts Coyote Foundation. Developmental analysis of conflict caused by opposing attributes in the adolescent self-portrait. Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 251-260. Relational self-worth: Differences in perceived worth as a person across interpersonal contexts among adolescents. Child Development, 69(3), 756-766. Cognitive aspects of self and motivation. In O. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction: Cognitive determinants (pp. 95-133). New York, NY: The Ronald Press Co. Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. New York, NY: Routledge. Hazen, E., Schlozman, S., & Beresin, E. (2008). Adolescent psychological development: A review. Pediatrics in Review, 29(5), 161-168. Heckman, J.J. (2008). The Case for Investing in Disadvantaged Young Children. In Big Ideas for Children: Investing in Our Nation’s Future (pp. 49-58). Washington, DC: First Focus. Heckman, J.J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P.A. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2052-2086. Hernandez, M., & Iyengar, S.S. (2001). What drives whom? A cultural perspective on human agency. Columbia University Business School of Social Cognition, 19(3), 269-294. Heron, T. (2008). Globalization, neoliberalism and the exercise of human agency. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 20(1-4), 85-101. Hewlett Foundation. (2013). Deeper learning competencies. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/documents/Deeper_ Learning_Defined_ _April_2013.pdf Hamilton, C.E. (2000). Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (2006). Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Hoff, E. (2003). Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 71(3), 690-694. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53(1), 87-97. Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 5th ed. Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3) (pp. 553-617). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368-1378. Hogue, A., & Steinberg, L. (1995). Homophily of internalized distress in adolescent peer groups. Developmental Psychologist, 31(6), 897-906. Howse, R.B., Calkins, S.D., Anastopoulos, A.D., Keane, S.P., Shelton, T.L. (2003). Regulatory contributors to children’s kindergarten achievement. Early Education and Development, 14(1), 101-120. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Hughes, E.C. (1958). Men and their work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Hughes, E.C. (1962). Good people and dirty work. Social Problems, 10(1), 3-11. Huizink, A.C., Robles de Medina, P.G., Mulder, E.J., Visser, G.H., Buitelaar, J.K. (2003). Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2009). The learning way: Meta-cognition aspects of experiential learning. Simulation Gaming, 40(3), 297-327. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Stress during pregnancy is associated with developmental outcome in infancy. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(6), 810-818. Kroger, J. (1993). Hulleman, C.S., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2009). Kupersmidt, J.B., & Coie, J.D. (1990). Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H., Vevea, J., Hedges, L.V. (2007). Labov, W. (1982). Making education relevant: Increasing interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410-1412. The varieties of speech to young children. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1062-1083. Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L.V. (2010). Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 61(4), 343-365. International Youth Foundation. (2013). Getting youth in the door: Defining soft skills requirements for entry-level service sector jobs. Baltimore, MD: Author. Ego identity: An overview. In J. Kroger (Ed.), Discussions on ego identity (pp. 1-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence. Child Development, 61(5), 1350-1362. Competing value systems in the inner city schools. In P. Gilmore & A. Glathorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education (pp. 148-171). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Ladd, G.W., & Price, J.M. (1986). Promoting children’s cognitive and social competence: The relation between parents’ perceptions of task difficulty and children’s perceived and actual competence. Child Development, 57(2), 446-460. Irby, M., Pittman, K.J., & Tolman, J. (2003). Lally, P., Van Jaarsveld, C.H.M., Potts, H.W.W., & Wardle, J. (2010). Blurring the lines: Expanding learning opportunities for children and youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 2003(97), 13-27. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998-1009. Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S.,…Craig, S. (2013). Lareau, A. (2003). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. James, W. (1912). Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Essays in radical empiricism. New York, NY: Longmans, Green. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Jones, J.C. (1992). Leffel, K., & Suskind, D. (2013, November). Design method, Vol. 4. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jones, S.M., & Bailey, R. (2014, January). An organizing model for social-emotional learning. Presented at the National Governors’ Association CrossState Policy Academy Meeting II, Washington, DC. Kaushal, N., Magnuson, K., & Waldfogel, J. (2011). How is family income related to investments in children’s learning? In G.J. Duncan & R.J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither Opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 187-206). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Keeton, M.T., Sheckley, B.G., & Griggs, J.K. (2002). Efficiency and effectiveness in higher education. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. Kids First Oakland (2008). Affordable youth transportation to school. Retrieved from http://www.kidsfirstoakland.org/index.php?s=96 References Parent-directed approaches to enrich the early language environments of children living in poverty. Seminars in Speech and Language, 42(4), 267-278. Lennon, J.M. (2010). Self-efficacy. In J.A. Rosen, E.J. Glennie, B.W. Dalton, J.M. Lennon, & R.N. Bozick (Eds.), Noncognitive skills in the classroom: New perspectives on educational research (pp. 91-115). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press/RTI International. Lerner, R.M., Brentano, C., Dowling, E.M., & Anderson, P.M. (2002). Positive youth development: Thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. New Directions for Youth Development, 2002(95), 11-33. 91 Li, J., & Julian, M. (2012). Markus, H.J., & Nurius, P.S. (1984). Lippman, L., Atienza, A., Rivers, A., & Keith, J. (2008). Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). Liu, J. (2004). Mayseless, O., & Keren, E. (2014). Livesley, W.J., & Bromley, D.B. (1973). McAdams, D.P., & Adler, J.M. (2010). Developing relationships as the active ingredient: A unifying working hypothesis of “what works” across intervention settings. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 157-166. A developmental perspective on college & workplace readiness. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Childhood externalizing behavior: theory and implications. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 17(3), 93-103. Person perception in childhood and adolescence. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705. 92 Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(5003), 272-292. Self-understanding and self-regulation in middle childhood. In National Research Council (Ed.), Development during middle childhood: The years from six to twelve (pp. 147-183). Washington, DC: National Academies. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Finding a meaningful life as a developmental task in emerging adulthood: The domains of love and work across cultures. Emerging Adulthood, 2(1), 63-73. Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative identity: Theory, research, and clinical implications. In J.E. Maddux & J. Tangney (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 36-50). New York, NY: Guilford Press. McClelland, M.M., Acock, A.C., & Morrison, F.J. (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 471-490. Loman, M.M., & Gunnar, M.R. (2010). McClelland, M.M., Cameron, C.E., Connor, C.M., Farris, C.L., Jewkes, A.M., & Morrison, F.J. (2007). Early experience and the development of stress reactivity and regulation in children. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(6), 867-876. Links between behavioral regulation and preschoolers’ literacy, vocabulary, and math skills. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 947. Luria, A.R. (1961). McClelland, M.M., Morrison, F.J., & Holmes, D.L. (2000). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York, NY: Liveright. Luster, T., & McAdoo, H.P. (1995). Factors related to self-esteem among African American youths: A secondary analysis of the High/Scope Perry Preschool data. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(4), 451-467. Mahoney, J.L., Lord, H., & Carryl, E. (2005). An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. Child Development, 76(4), 811-825. Marcia, J. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558. Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Children at risk for early academic problems: The role of learning-related social skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(3), 307-329. McCrae, R.R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 323. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S.R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. McCrae, R.R., Costa Jr., P.T., Terracciano, A., Parker, W.D., Mills, C.J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1456. McCrae, R.R., & Sutin, A.R. (2009). Openness to experience. New York, NY: Guilford Press. McGuire, W.J., McGuire, C.V., Child, P., & Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 511-520. Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 858-866. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework McGuire, W.J., & Padawer-Singer, A. (1976). Montemayor, R., & Eisen, M. (1977). McKnight, P.E., & Kashdan, T.B. (2009). Moroney, D., Newman, J., Smith, C., McGovern, G., & Yohalem, N. (2014). Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(6), 743-754. The importance of functional impairment to mental health outcomes: A case for reassessing our goals in depression treatment research. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(3), 243-259. Mezirow, J. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning. In S. Brookfield (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education (pp. 17-30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. MHA Labs (2014). MHA Building Blocks. Retrieved from http://mhalabs.org/ The development of self-conceptions from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 314-319. Understanding key elements, processes, and outcomes of expanded learning systems: A Review of the literature. New York, NY: Every Hour Counts. Morrison, F.J., Ponitz, C.C., & McClelland, M.M. (2010). Self-regulation and academic achievement in the transition to school. In S.D. Calkins & M.A. Bell (Eds.), Child Development at the Intersection of Emotion and Cognition (pp. 203-224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Moshman, D. (2005). Adolescent psychological development: Rationality, morality, and identity, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mueller, C.M., & Dweck, C.S. (1998). Mikva Challenge (2014). Program impact spotlight: Expunge.io. Retrieved from Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33-52. https://www.mikvachallenge.org/blog/program-impact- National Center for O*NET Development (2014). blog/2013/06/18/mha-building-blocks/ spotlight-expunge-io/ The O*Net Content Model. Retrieved from http://www. Mischel, W., Cantor, N., & Feldman, S. (1996). onetcenter.org/content.html Principles of self-regulation: The nature of willpower and self-control. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 329360). New York, NY: Guilford Press. National Governors’ Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Peake, P.K. (1988). Development during middle childhood: The years from six to twelve. Washington, DC: National Academies. The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 687. Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674. Moffitt, T.E. (2003). Life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial behavior: a 10-year research review and a research agenda. In T.E.M.B.B. Lahey & A. Caspi (Ed.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency (pp. 49-75). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Moffitt, T.E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., . . . Ross, S. (2011). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Authors. National Research Council (1984). National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. In J. P. Shonkoff & D. A. Phillips (Eds.), Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2002). Community Programs to Promote Youth Development. Committee Community-Level Programs for Youth. In J. Eccles & J. Appleton Gootman (Eds.), Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693-2698. Neal, J.W., & Neal, Z.P. (2013). Moilanen, K.L. (2007). Nicholls, J.G., & Miller, A.T. (1984). The adolescent self-regulatory inventory: The development and validation of a questionnaire of short-term and long-term self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(6), 835-848. References Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722-737. Reasoning about the ability of self and others: A developmental study. Child Development, 55(6), 1990-1999. 93 Noftle, E.E., & Robins, R.W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116-130. Office of Head Start, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011). The Head Start child development and early learning framework. Promoting positive outcomes in early childhood programs serving children 3-5 years old. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https:// eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/tta-system/teaching/eecd/ Assessment/Child%20Outcomes/HS_Revised_Child_ Outcomes_Framework%28rev-Sept2011%29.pdf Olivola, C.Y., & Shafir, E. (2013). The martyrdom effect: When pain and effort increase prosocial contributions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(1), 91-105. Oyserman, D. (2001). 94 Self-concept and identity. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of social psychology (pp. 499-517). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Oyserman, D. (2008). Racial-ethnic self-schemas: Multi-dimensional identity-based motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1186-1198. Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 188-204. Oyserman, D., & Fryberg, S. A. (2006). The possible selves of diverse adolescents: Content and function across gender, race, and national origin. In C. Dunkel & J. Kerpelman (Eds.), Possible selves: Theory, research, and application (pp. 17-39). Huntington, NY: Nova. Oyserman, D., & James, L. (2011). Possible identities. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 117-145). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Oyserman D., & Markus, H.R. (1998). Self as social representation. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social (pp. 107-125). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. (1990). Possible selves in balance: Implications for delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 141-157. Oyserman, D., Terry, K., & Bybee, D. (2002). A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 25(3), 313-326. Osterman, K.F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367. Ozer, D.J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review Psychology, Annual Reviews, 57, 401-421. Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. Parker, J.G., & Asher, S.R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are lowaccepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 357. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved from http://www.p21. org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf Patton, D.U. (2012). Connected, known, and protected: African American adolescent males navigating community violence (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago. ProQuest document ID 1040725746. Patton, D. (2013). Between two worlds: Resilient African American adolescent males navigating community violence. In M. Harris (Ed.), African American perspectives: Family dynamics, health care issues and the role of ethnicity (pp. 87-102). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Pellegrino, J.W., & Hilton, M.L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Perry, B.D. (2001). The neuroarchaeology of childhood maltreatment: The neuro-developmental costs of adverse childhood events. In K. Franey, R. Geffner, & R. Falconer (Eds.), The cost of child maltreatment: Who pays? We all do (pp. 15-37). San Diego, CA: Family Violence and Sexual Assault Institute. Perry, B. (2006). Applying principles of neurodevelopment to clinical work with maltreated and traumatised children. In N. Boyd Webb (Ed.). Working with Traumatised Youth in Child Welfare (pp. 27-52). Petersen, I.T., Bates, J.E., & Staples, A.D. (2015). The role of language ability and self-regulation in the development of inattentive-hyperactive behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 221-237. New York, NY: Guilford Press. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Philliber Research Associates. (2013). Beyond content: Incorporating social and emotional learning into the strive framework (Vol. I): Social and emotional competencies and their relationship to academic achievement. Accord, NY: StriveTogether. Phillips, T.M., & Pittman, J.F. (2003). Identity processes in poor adolescents: Exploring the linkages between economic disadvantage and the primary task of adolescence. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 3(2), 115-129. Phinney, J.S. (1989). Stages of ethnic identity development in minority group adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 9(1-2), 34-49. Phinney, J.S., & Rosenthal, D.A. (1992). Ethnic identity in adolescence: Process, context, and outcome. In G.R. Adams, T.P. Gullotta, & R. Montemayor (Eds.), Adolescent identity formation (pp. 145-172). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Reardon, S.F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murnane & G. Duncan (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of lowincome children (pp. 91-116). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Rimm-Kaufman, S.E., Pianta, R.C., & Cox, M.J. (2000). Teachers’ judgments of problems in the transition to kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(2), 147-166. Rogers, C.R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 13) (pp. 184-256). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Rokeach, M. (1971). Piaget, J. (1946/1951). Play, dreams and imitation in children. New York, NY: Norton. The measurement of values and value systems. In G. Abcarian & J.W. Soule (Eds.), Social psychology and political behavior (pp. X-Y). Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill. Piaget, J. (1952). Rosenberg, M. (1979). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International Universities Press. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. X-Y). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Ponitz, C.C., McClelland, M.M., Matthews, J.S., & Morrison, F.J. (2009). A structured observation of behavioral self-regulation and its contribution to kindergarten outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 605-619. Pritchard, J. (2013). The importance of soft skills in entry-level employment and postsecondary success: Perspectives from employers and community colleges. Seattle, OR: Seattle Jobs Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.seattlejobsinitiative.com/wpcontent/uploads/SJI_SoftSkillsReport_vFINAL_1.17.13.pdf Putnam, R. (2015). Our kids: The American Dream in crisis. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books. Rote, W.M., & Smetana, J.G. (2014). Parenting, adolescent–parent relationships, and social domain theory: Implications for identity development. In K.C. McLean & M. Syed (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 437-450). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Rotter, J.B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American psychologist, 45(4), 489. Rowe, M.L. (2008). Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 185-205. Ruble, D.N. (1983). The development of social comparison processes and their role in achievement-related self-socialization. Social cognition and social development: A sociocultural perspective, 134-157. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Discounting in judgment of delay and probability. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 145-159. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. Raver, C.C., & Knitze, J. (2002). Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2006). Rachlin, H., & Brown, J., & Cross, D. (2000). Ready to enter: What research tells policymakers about strategies to promote social and emotional school readiness among three- and four-year-old children. New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University. References Autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1586. Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., Morgan, C. (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 379. 95 Savitz-Romer, M., & Bouffard, S. (2012). Shih, M., Pittinsky, T.L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Scales, P.C., Benson, P.L., & Roehlkepartain, E.C. (2011). Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P.K. (1990). Ready, willing, and able: A developmental approach to college access and success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Adolescent thriving: The role of sparks, relationships, and empowerment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(3), 263-277. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Steinbach, R. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8(2), 173-190. Schunk, D.H., & Meece, J.L. (2006). Self-efficacy development in adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 97196). Greenwhich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Schunk, D.H., & Mullen, C.A. (2012). 96 Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10(1), 80-83. Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Development Psychology, 26(6), 978-986. Shonkoff, J.P. (2011). Protecting brains, not simply stimulating minds. Science, 333(6045), 982-983. Shonkoff, J.P., Garner, A.S., Siegel, B.S., Dobbins, M.I., Earls, M.F., McGuinn, L., Pasco, J., & Wood, D.L. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232-e246. Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219-235). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Shulman, S., Laursen, B., Kalman, Z., & Karpovsky, S. (1997). Schoenfeld, A.H. (1983). The making of young lives with/against the school credential. Journal of Education and Work, 16(2), 127-146. Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: A report, recommendation, and an annotated bibliography (MMA Notes #1). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In J.F. Voss, D.N. Perkins, & J.W. Segal (Eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education (pp. 311-343). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Schwartz, S.J., Côté, J.E., & Arnett, J.J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: Two developmental routes in the individualization process. Youth & Society, 37(2), 201-229. Schweinhart, L.J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W.S., Belfield, C.R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime effects: The HighScope Perry Preschool study through age 40. (Monographs of the HighScope Educational Research Foundation, 14). Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope Press. Search Institute. (2014). A research update from Search Institute: Developmental relationships. Minneapolis, MN: Author. Retrieved from http://www.search-institute.org/what-we-study/developmental-relationships Seligman, M.E.P. (1972). Learned helplessness. Annual Review of Medicine, 23, 407-412. Adolescent intimacy revisited. Journal of Youth in Adolescence, 26(5), 597-617. Smith, J. (2003). Smyth, J., & Hattam, R. (2001). “Voiced” research as a sociology for understanding “dropping out” of school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(3), 401-415. Stanton-Salazar, R.D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1066-1109. Steele, C.M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629. Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811. Stefanou, C.R., Perencevich, K.C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J.C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 97-110. Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69-74. Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence new perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 55-59. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Steinberg, L., & Morris, A.S. (2001). U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Stetser, M., & Stillwell, R. (2014). U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Stipek, D. (2004). U.S. White House, Office of the Press Secretary. (2009, April 24). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83-110. Public High School Four-Year On-Time Graduation Rates and Event Dropout Rates: School Years 2010-11 and 2011-12. First Look (NCES 2014-391). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press. Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J.H. (1996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 397. Susman, S., Dent, C., McAdams, L., Stacy, A., Burton D., & Flay, B. (1994). Group self-identification and adolescent cigarette smoking: A 1-year prospective study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(3), 576–80. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch Advancing civic learning and engagement in democracy: A road map and call to action. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Remarks by the President on higher education. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ Remarks-by-the-President-on-Higher-Education U.S. White House, Office of the Press Secretary. (2009, February 24). Presidential address to joint session of Congress. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_ office/Remarks-of-President-Barack-Obama-Address-toJoint-Session-of-Congress Ungar, M. (2004). The trouble with change: Self-verification and allegiance to the self. Psychological Science, 8(3), 177-180. A constructivist discourse on resilience. Multiple contexts, multiple realities among at-risk children and youth. Youth & Society, 35(3), 341-365. Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F., & Boone, A.L. (2004). Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortuc, D. (2011). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324. Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199-216. Tett, R.P., Jackson, D.N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Vygotsky, L. (1962). Swann, W. (1997). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: a meta-analytic review. Personnel psychology, 44(4), 703-742. Thaler, R., & Shefrin, H. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392-406. Thompson, R.A. (2008). Early attachment and later development: Familiar questions, new answers. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.) (pp. 348-365). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Tinto, V. (1997). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167-177. Trope, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2000). Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 493-506. Thought and language. Oxford, UK: Wiley. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wagner, T., & Compton, R.A. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. New York, NY: Scribner. Watson, M.W. (1981). The development of social roles: A sequence of socialcognitive development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1981(12), 33-41. Weber, J. (1993). Exploring the relationship between personal values and moral reasoning. Human Relations, 46(4), 435-463. Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Weinstock, M. (2005). University of Chicago Crime Lab (July 13, 2012). BAM–Sports Edition. Retrieved from https://crimelab. The potential influence of maternal stress hormones on development and mental health of the offspring. Brain, Behavior and Immunity, 19(4), 296-308. uchicago.edu/sites/crimelab.uchicago.edu/files/up- Weisberg, D.S., & Gopnik, A. (2013). loads/BAM_FINAL%20Research%20and%20Policy%20 Brief_20120711.pdf References Pretense, counterfactuals, and Bayesian causal models: Why what is not real really matters. Cognitive Science, 37(4), 1368-1381. 97 Weissberg, R.P., & Cascarino, J. (2013). Academic learning + social-emotional learning = national priority. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(2), 8-13. Wellman, H.M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684. Wethington, H.R., Hahn, R.A., Fuqua-Whitley, D.S. … Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2008). The effectiveness of interventions to reduce psychological harm from traumatic events among children and adolescents: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(3), 287-313. White, K.S., Bruce, S.E., Farrell, A.D., & Kliewer, W. (1998). Impact of exposure to community violence on anxiety: A longitudinal study of family social support as a protective factor for urban children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7(2), 187-203. Wigfield, A. (1994). 98 Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Education Psychology Review, 6(1), 49-78. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265-310. Winstein, C. (2014, April 9). Does practice make perfect? Retrieved from http://www. brainfacts.org/about-neuroscience/ask-an-expert/ articles/2014/does-practice-make-perfect/ Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J.E., & Debebe, G. (2003). Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 93-135. Yeager, D.S., Henderson, M.D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G.M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B.J., Duckworth, A.L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 559-580. Yeager, D., & Walton, G. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267-301. Yoshikawa, H., Aber, J.L., & Beardslee, W.R. (2012). The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth: Implications for prevention. American Psychologist, 67(4), 272-284. Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70. Zimmerman, B.J., & Cleary, T.J. (2006). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. In F. Pajares & T.C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5) (pp. 45-69). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Wilson, W.J. (2012). Zimmerman, B.J., & Ringle, J. (1981). Wilson, W.J. (1990). The declining significance of race: Blacks and changing American institutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Effects of model persistence and statements of confidence on children’s self-efficacy and problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 485-493. UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Appendix TABLE A .1 List of Experts Who Provided Input and Feedback Throughout This Project Name Organization Title Barbara Abel Educare of Chicago/Ounce of Prevention Fund Birth to Five Curriculum Specialist Rashida Abuwala Boys Clubs of NYC Chief Program Officer Stephanie Alyward University of Chicago Child Assessor Dana Ansel Research and Evaluation Consultant Melissa Authement Polaris Charter Academy Founding Teacher; Instructional Guide Abigail Baird Vasser College Associate Professor of Psychology Sara Bartolino Transforming Education Co-Founder and Executive Director Rhonda Bell Gary Comer Youth Center Director Sanee Bell Katy (TX) Independent School District Principal Leslie Beller MHA Labs Director and Founder (MHA) Ron Berger Expeditionary Learning Chief Academic Officer Harry Berman Illinois Board of Higher Education Executive Director Melinda Berry Educare of Chicago/Ounce of Prevention Fund Senior Family Support Specialist Jessica Besser-Rosenberg One Million Degrees Director, Research and Communications Suzanne Bouffard Harvard Graduate School of Education Researcher Sarah Bowie SGA Youth and Family Services Check & Connect Manager Daniela Boykin CUNY ASAP Deputy Director Betsy Brand American Youth Policy Forum Executive Director Chris Broughton Cristo Rey Network Senior Director of College Initiatives Chris Brown Elev8 Chicago Director of Education and Engagement Kat Bryant Capitol Hill Day School Middle School Teacher Amanda Cage Chicago Cook Workforce Partnership Director of Strategic Initiatives and Policy Dan Cardinali Communities in Schools President Barbara Cervone What Kids Can Do Founder and President Sandra Christenson University of Minnesota Professor Tonya Cody-Robinson Chicago Cook Workforce Partnership Project Coordinator Deloria Collins SGA Youth and Family Services Check & Connect Monitor Lauren Collins The Lab School, University of Chicago Early Childhood Education Administrator Denise Conkright PACT Executive Director David Conley University of Oregon, College of Education Professor; Director, Center for Educational Policy Research James Côté University of Western Ontario Professor, Department of Sociology Philip Courtney Urban Arts Partnership Founder Rachel Cytron Harlem RBI Associate Executive Director Greg Darnieder U.S. Department of Education Senior Advisor Joyce Debrah-Sheppard Chicago Public Schools Social and Emotional Learning Specialist Regina Deil-Amen University of Arizona Associate Professor, Center for the Study of Higher Education Appendix 99 100 Name Organization Title Aarti Dhupelia Chicago Public Schools Chief Officer, College and Career Success Angela Diaz Mount Sinai Hospital Jean C. and James W. Crystal Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Preventive Medicine; Director, Adolescent Health Center Larry Dieringer Engaging Schools Executive Director Jessica Donner Every Hour Counts Director Michael Driscoll Changing Worlds Manager of After-School and Community Outreach Programs Mark Duhon HighSight Founder and Executive Director Kelly Dwyer Spark Chief Knowledge Officer Jacquelynne Eccles University of California-Irvine Distinguished Professor of Education Brenda Eiland-Williford Ounce of Prevention Fund Director of Program and Curricula Crystal Elliott-O’Connor Family Focus, Inc. Associate Director, Early Childhood Development Programs Sandra Escamilla Youth Development Institute Executive Director Susan Farrugia University of Illinois at Chicago Assistant Vice Provost, Undergraduate Affairs Ron Ferguson Harvard Graduate School of Education Senior Lecturer in Education and Public Policy Connie Flanagan University of Wisconsin-Madison Professor, School of Human Ecology Ernestine Fleming-Jones Kenwood Academy Attendance Coordinator Nilda Flores-Gonzalez University of Illinois at Chicago Associate Professor, Department of Sociology Ellen Galinsky Families and Work Institute President and Co-Founder Kathleen Gallagher University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Clinical Assistant Professor Ruth Genn Bottom Line Executive Director, NYC Office Fakelia Guyton Family Focus, Evanston Program Manager Reginald Halbert Dunbar High School Teacher Lucy Hall Jumpstart Site Coordinator Robert Halpern Erikson Institute Professor Bridget Hamre University of Virginia, Curry School of Education Associate Director and Research Associate Professor, Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning Marcia Hanlon Associated Colleges of Illinois Director, College Readiness & Completion Colleen Harvey Playworks Program Director Keith Hefner Youth Communication Executive Director Carrie Heller Circus Arts Institute Founder and Executive Director Mary Louise Hemmeter Vanderbilt University Professor, Department of Special Education; Faculty Director of the Susan Gray School for Children Lucy Herz Student Success Network Program Director Lori Hill University of Michigan Assistant Professor Harry Holzer Georgetown University Professor, Public Policy Stephanie Jones Harvard Graduate School of Education Marie and Max Kargman Associate Professor in Human Development and Urban Education Kasumi Kato CircEsteem Coordinator Leeandra Khan Bronzeville Scholastic Institute Principal Michael Kristovic University of Chicago School of Social Service Administration, Network for College Success Adjunct Lecturer and Social and Academic Supports Facilitator Jiffy Lansing Chapin Hall Researcher Lila Leff UMOJA Student Development Corporation Founder UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework Name Organization Title Frank Levy MIT/Harvard Medical School Rose Professor Emeritus/Lecturer, Department of Health Care Policy Laura Lippman Child Trends Director for Education and Senior Research Scientist Lori Littleton 63rd St. Corridor Center for Working Families, Metropolitan Family Services Calumet Program Supervisor Amy Lloyd Jobs for the Future Program Director, Pathways to Prosperity Network William “BJ” Lohr After-School All Stars Chicago Program Manager Katherine Magnuson University of Wisconsin-Madison Professor, School of Social Work Dan McAdams Northwestern University Professor of Psychology; Department Chair Michael McPherson The Spencer Foundation President Beth Miller Expeditionary Learning Managing Director of Research and Communications Patrick Milton Chicago Public Schools Senior Manager, GEAR UP Melissa Mitchell Illinois Federation for Community Schools Executive Director Alex Molina Providence After School Alliance (PASA) Deputy Director Amanda Moreno Erikson Institute Assistant Professor Fernando Moreno BUILD, Inc. Special Projects Manager Lauri Morrison-Frichtl Illinois Head Start Association Executive Director Richard Murnane Harvard Graduate School of Education Juliana W. and William Foss Thompson Professor of Education and Society Jeff Nelson OneGoal Chief Executive Officer Gil Noam Harvard University, Program in Education, Afterschool and Resiliency (PEAR) Associate Professor and Director Jeannie Oakes Ford Foundation Director of Educational Equity and Scholarship programs Daphna Oyserman University of Southern California Dean’s Professor, Department of Psychology: Professor of Education and Communications Kune Park Former Middle School Teacher Elizabeth Partoyan Forum for Youth Investment Senior Fellow Desmond Patton Columbia University Assistant Professor, School of Social Work Rosha Pearson Carter G. Woodson Elementary School Teacher Jim Pellegrino University of Illinois at Chicago Co-Director, Learning Sciences Research Institute Carla Peterson Iowa State University Professor and Dean Jan Phlegar Former Executive Director of Learning Innovations at WestEd Education Consultant Paige Ponder One Million Degrees Chief Executive Officer Jane Quinn Children’s Aid Society Vice President for Community Schools Leticia Ramirez SGA Youth and Family Services Director of Early Childhood Services Darryl Rattray Beacon, Cornerstone & Service Learning Programs, NYC Department of Youth & Community Development Assistant Commissioner Cybele Raver New York University Vice Provost for Research and Faculty Affairs; Former Director, Institute of Human Development and Social Change John Rico Rico Enterprises Founder, President, and CEO Sara Rimm-Kaufman University of Virginia, Curry School of Education Professor of Education Magen Rodriguez Brooklyn School for Collaborative Studies Teacher Appendix 101 102 Name Organization Title Lori Roggman Utah State University Professor Blair Root Hyde Park Neighborhood Club Director Michael Rothman Eskolta Executive Director Jessica Ruiz Educare West Dupage Project Site Coordinator Sheila Rutter SGA Youth & Family Services Program Coordinator Mandy Savitz-Romer Harvard Graduate School of Education Senior Lecturer on Education; Director, Prevention Science and Practice Program Sara Sayigh DuSable High School Librarian Vanessa Schwartz Metropolitan Family Services Program Supervisor Robert Sherman Former Program Officer at Novo Foundation Independent Consultant Chris Smith Boston Afterschool and Beyond President and Executive Director Andrea Soonachan New York City Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Readiness Associate Director, College and Career Planning Brian Spittle DePaul University Assistant Vice President, Center for Access and Attainment Kathleen St. Louis Caliento Spark, Chicago Executive Director Wendy Stack Chicago GEAR UP Director Erin Starkey SGA Youth and Family Services Clinical Social Worker James R. Stone III University of Louisville Professor and Director, National Research Center for Career and Technical Education Wonju Suvatne Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School Teacher Vincent Tinto Syracuse University Distinguished Professor Emeritus Timothy Turner 100 Black Men of Chicago Volunteer Coordinator Joanna Vena Changing Worlds Program Director Alexandria WaltonRadford RTI International Associate Program Director, Postsecondary Education Sarah Watamura University of Denver Associate Professor Carolyn Webster-Stratton University of Washington Professor Emeritus and Founder of the Incredible Years Series Chris Whipple The After School Corporation Vice President of Programs Michael Wiggins Urban Arts Director of Education Phoebe Williams Year Up Director of Special Projects, National Alicia Wilson-Ahlstrom Forum for Youth Investment Senior Program Manager, Research and Development Alfonso Wyatt Fund for the City of New York Vice President Noreen Yazejian Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute Research Scientist Shoshanah Yehudah Elev8 Coordinator Southwest Organizing Project UCHICAGO CCSR Concept Paper | Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework 103 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 104 JENNY NAGAOKA is the Deputy Director of the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research, where she has conducted research for over 15 years. Her research interests focus on policy and practice in urban education reform, particularly using data to connect research and practice and examining the school environments and instructional practices that promote college readiness and success. She has co-authored numerous journal articles and reports, including studies of college readiness, noncognitive factors, the transition from high school to post-secondary education, and authentic intellectual instruction. Nagaoka is currently leading a project that is building a framework that seeks to create a common understanding of young people’s developmental needs from early childhood through late adolescence and how they can be supported through developmental experiences and relationships. Her current work includes examining how networks of schools can be used to develop the capacity of practitioners to effectively use data to address issues in their schools. Nagaoka received her BA from Macalester College and her master’s of public policy degree from the Irving B. Harris School of Public Policy at the University of Chicago. CAMILLE A. FARRINGTON is a Senior Research Associate at the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research (UChicago CCSR). Her work focuses on policy and practice in urban high school reform, particularly classroom instruction and assessment, academic rigor, and academic failure. Dr. Farrington is a national expert on the role of “noncognitive” factors in academic performance and the role of “developmental experiences” in child/youth development. She is the lead author of Teaching Adolescents to Become Learners: The Role of Noncognitive Factors in Shaping School Performance (2012), a comprehensive research review that illustrates how noncognitive factors interact with school and classroom contexts to affect students’ academic achievement. She is Principal Investigator on three studies, the national Becoming Effective Learners (BEL) Survey Development Project, the Chicago 8/9 Teacher Network, and the BEL Partner Project, all focused on better understanding the relationship between teacher practice, student noncognitive factors, and school success. The latter project involves deep work with school and district partners around the country in using surveys and other data to support teacher practice for noncognitive development and improve students’ opportunities for learning. Her 2014 book, Failing at School: Lessons for Redesigning Urban High Schools (Teachers College Press), documents how high schools systematically construct widespread student failure for the most socially vulnerable students, and offers practical recommendations for restructuring secondary education to serve goals of equity and excellence rather than selection and stratification. Dr. Farrington received a BA from the University of California at Santa Cruz, teacher certification from Mills College, and a PhD in Policy Studies in Urban Education from the University of Illinois at Chicago. STACY B. EHRLICH is a Senior Research Analyst at UChicago Consortium on Chicago School Research. She is a developmental psychologist with expertise in the areas of children’s early conceptual development. Ehrlich has led the development of the early childhood education research agenda at UChicago CCSR. Her work at UChicago CCSR focuses on a range of topics affecting students in Chicago including studying the reasons for, and impacts of, early chronic absenteeism; developing a deeper understanding of how noncognitive factors develop over childhood and adolescence across a variety of contexts; and partnering with the Ounce of Prevention Fund to develop surveys that capture the strengths of organizational supports and structures for effective teaching and learning in early education settings. Prior to joining UChicago CCSR, Ehrlich worked at Education Development Center, Inc. as a research associate with the IES-funded Regional Education Laboratory-Northeast and Islands, where she examined questions that responded to states’ educational policy concerns. Ehrlich holds a PhD in developmental psychology from the University of Chicago and a BS from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. RYAN D. HEATH is a research assistant at University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research, and a doctoral student in the School of Social Service Administration (SSA) at the University of Chicago. Previously, Heath facilitated a variety of school and community-based youth development and experiential education programs. He is also a clinical social worker with experience in cognitive-behavioral therapies, mindfulness-based approaches, adventure therapy, and anti-oppressive practices. His general areas of study include adolescent development, school experience, youth development programs, and organized out-of-school activities. His current research and dissertation examine the association of out-of-school organized activities with noncognitive factors and academic outcomes. Heath earned his BS from Brown University and an MA in clinical social work from SSA. This report reflects the interpretation of the authors. Although UChicago CCSR’s Steering Committee provided technical advice, no formal endorsement by these individuals, organizations, or the full Consortium should be assumed. CONSORTIUM ON CHICAGO SCHOOL RESEARCH Directors Steering Committee ELAINE M. ALLENSWORTH Lewis-Sebring Director KATHLEEN ST. LOUIS CALIENTO Co-Chair Spark, Chicago EMILY KRONE Director for Outreach and Communication JENNY NAGAOKA Deputy Director MELISSA RODERICK Senior Director Hermon Dunlap Smith Professor School of Social Service Administration PENNY BENDER SEBRING Co-Founder SUSAN E. SPORTE Director for Research Operations MARISA DE LA TORRE Director for Internal Research Capacity KIM ZALENT Co-Chair Business and Professional People for the Public Interest Ex-Officio Members Individual Members VERONICA ANDERSON Communications Consultant JOANNA BROWN Logan Square Neighborhood Association CATHERINE DEUTSCH Illinois Network of Charter Schools RUANDA GARTH MCCULLOUGH Young Women’s Leadership Academy LUISIANA MELÉNDEZ Erikson Institute CRISTINA PACIONE-ZAYAS Latino Policy Forum PAIGE PONDER One Million Degrees SARA RAY STOELINGA Urban Education Institute RAQUEL FARMER-HINTON University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Institutional Members KIRABO JACKSON Northwestern University BRIAN SPITTLE DePaul University CHRIS JONES Stephen T. Mather High School MATTHEW STAGNER Mathematica Policy Research DENNIS LACEWELL Urban Prep Charter Academy for Young Men AMY TREADWELL Chicago New Teacher Center JOHN R. BARKER Chicago Public Schools CLARICE BERRY Chicago Principals and Administrators Association AARTI DHUPELIA Chicago Public Schools KAREN G.J. LEWIS Chicago Teachers Union SHERRY J. ULERY Chicago Public Schools LILA LEFF Umoja Student Development Corporation LUIS R. SORIA Chicago Public Schools ERIN UNANDER Al Raby High School ARIE J. VAN DER PLOEG American Institutes for Research (Retired) 1313 East 60th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 T 773-702-3364 F 773-702-2010 ccsr.uchicago.edu OUR MISSION The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research (UChicago CCSR) conducts research of high technical quality that can inform and assess policy and practice in the Chicago Public Schools. We seek to expand communication among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners as we support the search for solutions to the problems of school reform. UChicago CCSR encourages the use of research in policy action and improvement of practice, but does not argue for particular policies or programs. Rather, we help to build capacity for school reform by identifying what matters for student success and school improvement, creating critical indicators to chart progress, and conducting theory-driven evaluation to identify how programs and policies are working.